Anton Batey in league with McAdams and Von Pein ?
Gil Jesus
"Who is Anton Batey? CTKA takes a close look at a most curious radio
host who is a JFK denier, Chomskyite, and yet happens to be in league
with John McAdams and David Von Pein. Yep, its all true."
David Von Pein
>>> "FROM THE CTKA WEBSITE--COMING SOON!! --- "Who is Anton Batey? CTKA takes a close look at a most curious radio host who is a JFK denier, Chomskyite, and yet happens to be in league with John McAdams and David Von Pein. Yep, its [sic] all true."" <<<
Yeah, I've been watching the CTKA site for the last couple of weeks to
see what type of nonsense DiEugenio & Company are going to dish out
regarding Mr. Batey. I have no doubt that most of it will be pure
fantasy and CT spin.
BTW, what in the world is a "JFK denier"?
If DiEugenio is implying that Batey is a "JFK Conspiracy
Denier" (which Batey is not, AFAIK), then how would that stance make
it seem odd that he was also "in league" with myself and Professor
McAdams?
Anyway, I'm sure that Mr. Batey will get a good laugh out of the CTKA
article about him, just like I am still enjoying the residual laughs
whenever I revisit DiEugenio's 2-part essay about me.
I'm guessing that Jim DiEugenio probably thinks that Anton Batey, John
McAdams, and myself are long-time friends and buddies. And Jimbo
likely also thinks that the three of us get together on a regular
basis to "plot" against the conspiracy theorists of the world.
That is the same mindset that DiEugenio possesses with respect to any
connection that I have to LNers like McAdams, Dave Reitzes, and
Francois Carlier too. And nothing could be further from the truth. But
I'll bet that DiEugenio would be more than willing to call me a liar
if I told him that my "connection" to Mr. Anton Batey is virtually non-
existent.
I cannot speak for Professor McAdams and his contact with Mr. Batey,
of course, but as far as myself personally, I have shared a very few e-
mails with Mr. Batey (the last of which had nothing to do with the JFK
assassination at all), and in 2009 I talked with him a few times at
the IMDB JFK forum.
And our IMDB conversations were not very cordial ones either, I might
add, as Anton was rather annoyed at me because I wouldn't debate some
unknown conspiracist on his radio show (with the CTer turning out to
be Tom Rossley).
But as far as being buddy-buddy and in constant contact with Mr. Batey
-- no way. It hasn't happened. But I would wager that Mr. DiEugenio
thinks otherwise. Jim D. sees plots and devious conspiracies
everywhere he looks, of course. And apparently he's now decided to
focus his high-powered microscope on Anton Batey, for some reason.
Mr. Batey, btw, did a nice job moderating all of these debates (below)
about the JFK assassination. He stayed squarely on the fence in all of
these programs, and just let the opponents fight their battles. In
fact, when listening to any of these debates from 2009 and 2010, it's
very difficult to determine whether Batey believes in a conspiracy in
the JFK case or not. He was THAT neutral in his moderation of these
debates:
http://JFK-Archives.blogspot.com/2010/10/radio-debates-featuring-john-mcadams.html
http://JFK-Archives.blogspot.com/2010/11/jfk-assassination-debate.html
aeffects
> >>> "FROM THE CTKA WEBSITE---COMING SOON!! --- "Who is Anton Batey? CTKA takes a close look at a most curious radio host who is a JFK denier, Chomskyite, and yet happens to be in league with John McAdams and David Von Pein. Yep, its [sic] all true."" <<<
>
> Yeah, I've been watching the CTKA site for the last couple of weeks to
> see what type of nonsense DiEugenio & Company are going to dish out
> regarding Mr. Batey. I have no doubt that most of it will be pure
> fantasy and CT spin.
>
> BTW, what in the world is a "JFK denier"?
>
> If DiEugenio is implying that Batey is a "JFK Conspiracy
> Denier" (which Batey is not, AFAIK), then how would that stance make
> it seem odd that he was also "in league" with myself and Professor
> McAdams?
>
> Anyway, I'm sure that Mr. Batey will get a good laugh out of the CTKA
> article about him, just like I am still enjoying the residual laughs
> whenever I revisit DiEugenio's 2-part essay about me.
>
> (below) about the JFK assassination. He stayed squarely on the fence
> in all of these programs, and just let the opponents fight their
> battles. In fact, when listening to any of these debates from 2009 and
> conspiracy in the JFK case or not. He was THAT neutral in his
> moderation of these debates:
>
>
> http://JFK-Archives.blogspot.com/2010/11/jfk-assassination-debate.html
son... with your 30 websites, 16 blogs, 90,000 USENET board
posts, ???,??? forum posts, 500+ Amazon reviews not to mention; the
Amazon discussion forum... you been a busy boy, son! So now you want
keep up with a run-of-the-mill radio host? His studio right next to
your deep fryer or sump'in? Time to recruit a few more out of that 2nd
semester (or 3rd quarter) sophomore class...
Are we seeing the DVP [sic] composite unraveling folks? From pure
overload? :)
So David VP [sic], if you plan to make inroads re the "up to 90%" of
thinking Americans whom **believe** a conspiracy murdered JFK, you're
gonna have to learn how to address intelligent folk, dude! Take a walk
on the wild side throw up all that WCR pap, get a real meal, CTKA can
feed you for years.....
David Von Pein
>>> "...you're gonna have to learn how to address intelligent folk, dude!" <<<
That guarantees I'll never be addressing you about the JFK case.
timstter
LOL! 90% of *thinking* Americans?!!
About 10% of THEM know the specifics!
Very few of them know that Oswald killed a policeman.
VERY few of them know or care that Oswald attempted to murder Edwin
Walker.
A good proportion of them believe in Bigfoot!
THIS is your *thinking* 90%?!!
LOL!
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
tom...@cox.net
Anton told you from the beginning tht he was a Warren Commission Supporter.
David Von Pein <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
> Yeah, I've been watching the CTKA site for the last couple of weeks to
> see what type of nonsense DiEugenio & Company are going to dish out
> regarding Mr. Batey. I have no doubt that most of it will be pure
> fantasy and CT spin.
>
> BTW, what in the world is a "JFK denier"?
>
> If DiEugenio is implying that Batey is a "JFK Conspiracy
> Denier" (which Batey is not, AFAIK), then how would that stance make
> it seem odd that he was also "in league" with myself and Professor
> McAdams?
>
> Anyway, I'm sure that Mr. Batey will get a good laugh out of the CTKA
> article about him, just like I am still enjoying the residual laughs
> whenever I revisit DiEugenio's 2-part essay about me.
>
> Anton Batey, btw, did a nice job moderating all of these debates
> (below) about the JFK assassination. He stayed squarely on the fence
> in all of these programs, and just let the opponents fight their
> battles. In fact, when listening to any of these debates from 2009 and
> 2010, it's very difficult to determine whether Mr. Batey believes in a
> conspiracy in the JFK case or not. He was THAT neutral in his
> moderation of these debates:
>
> http://JFK-Archives.blogspot.com/2010/10/radio-debates-featuring-john-mca
> dams.html
--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB
David Von Pein
>>> "Anton [Batey] told you from the beginning [that] he was a Warren Commission Supporter." <<<
The above post from Kook Rossley prompted me to dig into my JFK
archives to see if perhaps Rossley the Kook was right about something
(for a change).
And, amazingly enough, Kook Rossley was correct. (Miracles must be
possible after all.)
Anton Batey did, indeed, make the following statement in late March of
2009 on the JFK forum at the Internet Movie Database website (IMDB):
"I frequently host a local radio station in Detroit, and was
wondering if there are any lone gunman theorist[s] who would be
interested in a radio phone debate against a conspiracy theorist. I
will be the host of the show, and will be objective (although I
personally believe the killing was done by Oswald...alone)." -- Anton
Batey; March 2009
Below is the Google Groups source post for the above quote (the
original IMDB.com post is no longer available or active):
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/fa8725ff91816274
I have no idea, however, if Anton's current (2011) core beliefs
regarding the assassination are the same as the ones indicated via the
2009 quote shown above, although they very well may be the same.
I think I can be confident enough in saying, however, that nothing Tom
Rossley said in any of his debates against either John McAdams or John
Corbett could have possibly swayed Mr. Batey into believing that a
conspiracy existed in Dallas in November 1963.
This type of thing (i.e., confirming an individual's quote from years
ago) is one big reason I like to save most of my Internet posts. It
provides a nice database from which to search older posts and
discussions that, frankly, I just cannot remember off the top of my
head.
My memory is getting worse, I think. And that makes me sad. But what
is even sadder and more heartbreaking is having to say "you were
correct" to a mega-kook like Thomas Rossley.
But, oh well, sometimes life's tasks aren't pleasant ones.
Jason Burke
> You worthless piece of shit;
>
> Anton told you from the beginning tht he was a Warren Commission Supporter.
>
>
>
>
> David Von Pein<davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>> Yeah, I've been watching the CTKA site for the last couple of weeks to
>> regarding Mr. Batey. I have no doubt that most of it will be pure
>> fantasy and CT spin.
>>
>> BTW, what in the world is a "JFK denier"?
>>
>> If DiEugenio is implying that Batey is a "JFK Conspiracy
>> Denier" (which Batey is not, AFAIK), then how would that stance make
>> it seem odd that he was also "in league" with myself and Professor
>> McAdams?
>>
>> Anyway, I'm sure that Mr. Batey will get a good laugh out of the CTKA
>> article about him, just like I am still enjoying the residual laughs
>> whenever I revisit DiEugenio's 2-part essay about me.
>>
>> Anton Batey, btw, did a nice job moderating all of these debates
>> (below) about the JFK assassination. He stayed squarely on the fence
>> in all of these programs, and just let the opponents fight their
>> battles. In fact, when listening to any of these debates from 2009 and
>> 2010, it's very difficult to determine whether Mr. Batey believes in a
>> conspiracy in the JFK case or not. He was THAT neutral in his
>> moderation of these debates:
>>
>> http://JFK-Archives.blogspot.com/2010/10/radio-debates-featuring-john-mca
>> dams.html
>
Good job! You almost made a whole sentence without looking like you have
the brain of a retarded four-year-old.
I'll bet your mama is so proud! Does she still suck your dick when
you're a good boy?
David Von Pein
TONY MARSH SAID:
>>> "I like the way you try to deny at first that you have any connection with Batey and McAdams and then you just blurt out that you have shared several e-mails with him and talked to him. Giving credence to the claim that you three are members of a cabal." <<<
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
You're hilarious, Marsh.
A "cabal"?? LOL.
Combining all manners of communication (e-mail, IMDB forum posts, and
YouTube messages), I have spoken with Anton Batey perhaps four or five
times--total. And I've never once spoken to him (or John McAdams or
Dave Reitzes) in person.
But I'll bet Jim DiEugenio won't hesitate for a minute in putting a
nice big ol' inaccurate spin on this matter in his CTKA article on
Batey, as he will probably be insinuating that Batey and myself are
like blood brothers who conspire behind closed doors 24/7 against the
evil CTers of Planet Earth.
And why are you deliberately misstating what I said about the e-mails,
Tony? I never said "several e-mails". Just the opposite in fact.
Here's what I said:
"I have shared a very few e-mails with Mr. Batey (the last of
which had nothing to do with the JFK
assassination at all), and in 2009 I talked with him a few times at
the IMDB JFK forum. And our IMDB conversations were not very cordial
ones either [see post linked below for proof of this], I might add, as
Anton was rather annoyed at me because I wouldn't debate some unknown
conspiracist on his radio show. .... But as far as being buddy-buddy
and in constant contact with Mr. Batey -- no way. It hasn't happened.
But I would wager that Mr. DiEugenio thinks otherwise. Jim D. sees
plots and devious conspiracies everywhere he looks, of course." -- DVP
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/9efb060816bb96e5
timstter
> You worthless piece of shit;
>
> Anton told you from the beginning tht he was a Warren Commission Supporter.
>
>
>
>
> > Yeah, I've been watching the CTKA site for the last couple of weeks to
> > see what type of nonsense DiEugenio & Company are going to dish out
> > regarding Mr. Batey. I have no doubt that most of it will be pure
> > fantasy and CT spin.
>
> > BTW, what in the world is a "JFK denier"?
>
> > If DiEugenio is implying that Batey is a "JFK Conspiracy
> > Denier" (which Batey is not, AFAIK), then how would that stance make
> > it seem odd that he was also "in league" with myself and Professor
> > McAdams?
>
> > Anyway, I'm sure that Mr. Batey will get a good laugh out of the CTKA
> > article about him, just like I am still enjoying the residual laughs
> > whenever I revisit DiEugenio's 2-part essay about me.
>
> > Anton Batey, btw, did a nice job moderating all of these debates
> > (below) about the JFK assassination. He stayed squarely on the fence
> > in all of these programs, and just let the opponents fight their
> > battles. In fact, when listening to any of these debates from 2009 and
> > 2010, it's very difficult to determine whether Mr. Batey believes in a
> > conspiracy in the JFK case or not. He was THAT neutral in his
> > moderation of these debates:
>
> > dams.html
>
> --
> --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB
There's no need to speak to Gil like that, tomnln.
We'll do that for you!
Helpful Regards,
aeffects
> >>> "...you're gonna have to learn how to address intelligent folk, dude!" <<<
>
> That guarantees I'll never be addressing you about the JFK case.
now THAT in capsule forum is your ignorance -- you actually think your
smart -- Dude, you haven't a lick of common sense...
And above all, stay that way... we need you hyping more Lone Nut
publications on the internet, its a guarantee they'll go right down
the shitter, just like Bugliosi's Reclaiming History -- the worst book
publishing disaster, ever!
KUTGW David *I can sell anything on the net* Von Pein!
LMAO!
tom...@cox.net
> On Feb 13, 1:00=A0pm, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> > You worthless piece of shit;
> >
> > Anton told you from the beginning tht he was a Warren Commission
> > =A0$=
> 9.95/Month 30GB
>
> There's no need to speak to Gil like that, tomnln.
>
> We'll do that for you!
>
> Helpful Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
The only "Helpfull" you've ever ben is to SATAN ! ! !
--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
timstter
Now tomnln is having a go @ lil' Benny Holmes!
The JFK-CT claque here is unravelling @ an alarming rate of knots!
Concerned Regards,
aeffects
your penis envy is alarming troll.... that old Fresno type winter got
you down, shithead?
David Von Pein
http://www.box.net/shared/cvv5ky3y2i
Jim DiEugenio, as per his norm, read aloud on Black Op Radio pretty
much the whole Part 1 of the Anton Batey article this week (2/17/11).
I'd be surprised if Len Osanic wasn't sleeping soundly throughout most
of this one-hour segment (linked above). I didn't hear Len snoring
during the broadcast, but it wouldn't surprise me if he was.
The most hilarious part of the whole February 17th program isn't
DiEugenio's particular disagreements with Noam Chomsky or Anton Batey,
but it's the way DiEugenio mispronounces Batey's last name throughout
the entire radio segment.
I know that the mispronouncing of someone's name is a totally
unimportant matter in the grand scheme of things, but in DiEugenio's
case, it almost seems to be a chronic disease of some kind. And not
just with Anton's name. Jim mangles a lot of other names on a regular
basis too, including my own and Vincent Bugliosi's. And I have a
feeling that Jim continually distorts Bugliosi's name just out of
sheer spite. Because I know darn well he knows Vincent's "G" is
silent.
BTW, Anton Batey's last name is pronounced BAY-tee. And for
verification of that fact, all one needs to do is listen to the first
10 seconds of the 4/5/09 and 3/13/10 debates that Mr. Batey moderated
(linked below), and you'll hear Batey himself say his own name aloud
on the air. But perhaps DiEugenio doesn't think Anton knows how to
pronounce his own name.
http://JFK-Archives.blogspot.com/2010/10/radio-debates-featuring-john-mcadams.html
And I know that DiEugenio listened to the April '09 debate between
John McAdams and Tom Rossley, because he has commented on how lousy
the debate and the debate format were during multiple episodes of
Black Op Radio since that debate occurred in 2009.
As for the bulk of the Batey article, it was truly a "Who Cares?" type
of article (and Black Op show) as far as I am concerned. Others are
free to disagree, of course.
But I think we all already knew that Mr. DiEugenio was very much "anti-
Chomsky", and he certainly is very much "anti-LNer" when it comes to
the topic of John Kennedy's assassination (regardless of who the lone-
assassin believer happens to be -- whether it is myself or John
McAdams or Vince Bugliosi or Anton Batey).
So, in my personal view, Part 1 of Brian Hunt's article on Batey is a
whole lot of to-do about nothing. There are always going to be
disagreements about President Kennedy's policies and intentions
regarding certain matters (such as Vietnam, the Bay of Pigs, and the
Cuban Missile Crisis, et al).
It seems to be a perpetual debate that never really leads anywhere --
such as the question of "Would Kennedy have pulled entirely out of
Vietnam or not?" had he not been killed in Dallas?
The Batey article, for the most part, seems to merely be a smear piece
against Noam Chomsky. And since Batey supports many of Chomsky's
views, Batey gets smeared in the process.
Part 2 of the article should be a screamer too....as I look forward to
seeing what "connections" Brian Hunt and James DiEugenio think I
personally have to Mr. Anton Batey.
David Von Pein
http://EducationForum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=17383&st=0&p=219819&#entry219819
JIM DiEUGENIO THE KOOK WROTE:
Another yawner from Mr. Irrelevant.
In Part 2 we will see why Davey Boy is up in arms about the exposure
of Anton Batey. (BTW, he used to complain that I mispronounced his
name also. WHich shows where his head is at.)
BTW, I didn't read a large part of it. Most of it I did not read at
all. There is so much Bataey screws up, or leaves out, its incredible.
Sort of like DVP on the assassination.
DVP sums up with his usual "Who cares".
RIght, who cares if:
1. Chomsky tried to cover up the Pol Pot genocide in Cambodia, one of
the worst of modern times.
2. If Chomsky tried to conceal his ties to a Holocaust denier in
France.
3. In direct opposition to what he said when Stone's film came out,
Chomsky actually thought of leading an effort to reopen the JFK case
in 1969, because he was convinced it was a conspiracy!
This is not important in figuring out who CHomsky is? OK, Mr. Orwell.
And Batey does not tell you any of this while quoting form his master
as if it is the Gospel truth. There's openness and honesty for you.
Like I said, we will see why DVP does not like the article in Part 2.
Anyway, as usual, Davey Boy's reaction is a direct inverse barometer
to how important an article is.
Recall, Davey used to say that BOR had all of two listeners. When in
fact Len now has thousands of listeners all over the world. And his
traffic has gone up 38% in the last month. That is how much DVP's
comments on BOR are worth.
=================================
DAVID VON PEIN THEN SAID:
I couldn't care less what Noam Chomsky says. I've never read anything
written by him--ever--BTW. I couldn't have even told you last week
whether or not he was an "LNer" or a "CTer" when it came to his
opinions about the JFK murder. I just don't care one way or the other.
As for Anton Batey -- his opinions are his own, and he has every right
to them, and he every right to speak them freely (on YouTube, or
wherever). As does Chomsky, of course.
BTW 2 -- I have never once talked about any of the details concerning
the JFK assassination with Anton Batey. Never once.
Now, call me a liar, DiEugenio. I dare ya.
tom...@cox.net
BCAUSE YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY DUMMY ! ! !
> Now, call me a liar, DiEugenio. I dare ya.
--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
timstter
You don't know shit about manners, tomnln.
And very little about evidence/testimony either.
Informative Regards,
aeffects
sitdown shithead.... I'm constantly amazed you can operate a mouse...
go get'em Fresno flash!
tom...@cox.net
> On Feb 19, 3:26=A0pm, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> > David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > >=
> =3D21...
> > > =
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> >
> > > DAVID VON PEIN THEN SAID:
> >
> > > I couldn't care less what Noam Chomsky says. I've never read anything
> > > written by him--ever--BTW. I couldn't have even told you last week
> > > whether or not he was an "LNer" or a "CTer" when it came to his
> > > opinions about the JFK murder. I just don't care one way or the
> > > other.
> >
> > > As for Anton Batey -- his opinions are his own, and he has every
> > > right to them, and he every right to speak them freely (on YouTube,
> > > or wherever). As does Chomsky, of course.
> >
> > > BTW 2 -- I have never once talked about any of the details concerning
> > > the JFK assassination with Anton Batey. Never once.
> >
> > BCAUSE YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY DUMMY ! ! !
> >
> > > Now, call me a liar, DiEugenio. I dare ya.
> >
> > --
> > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> > =A0$=
>
> You don't know shit about manners, tomnln.
>
> And very little about evidence/testimony either.
>
> Informative Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
Looks like you're Really upset with me for making you look Bad on these>>>
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/rob_spencer_page.htm
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/guess_who_wrote.htm
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/secret_service_drinking.htm
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/eusebio_azcue.htm
--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
timstter
Let's revisit your pathetic exchanges with Rob Spencer, where you
thought he was REALLY Eusebio Azcue's son:
QUOTE ON:
Rossley on:
"Is your Father still Alive?
Did your father tell you it was NOT Oswald in the Consulate?
Do you live in Cuba now?"
Azcue On:
My father has passed many many years ago, I live now in Miami,
Florida. My father was a great supporter of the Revolution and spoke
greatly of El Presidente Fidel Castro and President Kennedy.
My father told me many stories of the old days in Mexico City, he said
there were many spies in Mexico City, but Oswald was not one of them
I have to go, I am sorry my english is not good, I have not lerned
much since I came to America in 1984, but I have taken a few classes
at the University and am practicing more now.
Perhaps you can write me again
Eusobio Azcue
Rossley On:
I would Love to see your Father's papers.
Can you make copies for me?
Do you have a scanner that will allow you to scan them & send them
along as an attachment to e-mail?
In testimony your Fatger said the Oswald he saw at the embassy was NOT
the real Oswald.
Thank You, Tom
Azcue on:
Mr. Tomnln,
Almost all of my father's papers are in Spanish. They are
communications between the Cuban Consulate and many other Consulates
around the world. There are a few writen in English but most are
Spanish.
I see on your website that you have written about my father. That is
why I give you these papers, maybe it will help you no? I came across
your website while I was researching some things for my class.
Rossley On:
would very much like to read what your Father wrote.
I am particularily interested what he wrote about his work in Mxico
City.
Do you want to send them via the Internet?
Do you want to send them by U S Mail?
Thanks Again, Tom Rossley
QUOTE OFF
KUTGW, Clownnln!
LMFAO Regards,
aeffects
Ya got Timmy the Fatster tripping over his love handles there Tom....
Don't rip him a new one for anpother 12 months or so, we need that
Fresno flash displaying that long sought after, lone nut insanity --
say, for at least that much longer...
tom...@cox.net
Lying Asshole Rob Spencer then went o to ay i was a fool because Azcue did
nOT hav a son.
Jut moe proof tht LN's neever rad th official volumes.
Hd someone hadd the HSCA volume III to Spncer he would have known that
Azcue "DID" have a son who visited the Cuban consulate in Mexico City.
You can add this one to the list of Six times I proved Fat pencer a LIAR !
! !
timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 20, 3:01=A0am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> > timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 19, 3:26=3DA0pm, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> > > > David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > >http://EducationForum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=3D3D17383&st
> > > > >=
> =3D3D0&p
> > > > >=3D
> > > =3D3D21...
> > > > > &#entry219819
> >
> > > > > JIM DiEUGENIO THE KOOK WROTE:
> >
> > > > > Another yawner from Mr. Irrelevant.
> >
> > > > > In Part 2 we will see why Davey Boy is up in arms about the
> > > > > exposur=
> e
> > > > > of Anton Batey. (BTW, he used to complain that I mispronounced
> > > > > his name also. WHich shows where his head is at.)
> >
> > > > > BTW, I didn't read a large part of it. Most of it I did not read
> > > > > at all. There is so much Bataey screws up, or leaves out, its
> > > > > incredible. Sort of like DVP on the assassination.
> >
> > > > > DVP sums up with his usual "Who cares".
> >
> > > > > RIght, who cares if:
> >
> > > > > 1. Chomsky tried to cover up the Pol Pot genocide in Cambodia,
> > > > > one =
> of
> > > > > the worst of modern times.
> >
> > > > > 2. If Chomsky tried to conceal his ties to a Holocaust denier in
> > > > > France.
> >
> > > > > 3. In direct opposition to what he said when Stone's film came
> > > > > out, Chomsky actually thought of leading an effort to reopen the
> > > > > JFK cas=
> e
> > > > > in 1969, because he was convinced it was a conspiracy!
> >
> > > > > This is not important in figuring out who CHomsky is? OK, Mr.
> > > > > Orwel=
> l.
> >
> > > > > And Batey does not tell you any of this while quoting form his
> > > > > mast=
> er
> > > > > as if it is the Gospel truth. There's openness and honesty for
> > > > > you.
> >
> > > > > Like I said, we will see why DVP does not like the article in
> > > > > Part =
> 2.
> > > > > Anyway, as usual, Davey Boy's reaction is a direct inverse
> > > > > baromete=
> r
> > > > > to how important an article is.
> >
> > > > > Recall, Davey used to say that BOR had all of two listeners. When
> > > > > i=
> n
> > > > > fact Len now has thousands of listeners all over the world. And
> > > > > his traffic has gone up 38% in the last month. That is how much
> > > > > DVP's comments on BOR are worth.
> >
> > > > > =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
> > > > > =
> =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
> > > > > =3D
> > > =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
> >
> > > > > DAVID VON PEIN THEN SAID:
> >
> > > > > I couldn't care less what Noam Chomsky says. I've never read
> > > > > anythi=
> ng
> > > > > written by him--ever--BTW. I couldn't have even told you last
> > > > > week whether or not he was an "LNer" or a "CTer" when it came to
> > > > > his opinions about the JFK murder. I just don't care one way or
> > > > > the other.
> >
> > > > > As for Anton Batey -- his opinions are his own, and he has every
> > > > > right to them, and he every right to speak them freely (on
> > > > > YouTube, or wherever). As does Chomsky, of course.
> >
> > > > > BTW 2 -- I have never once talked about any of the details
> > > > > concerni=
> ng
> > > > > the JFK assassination with Anton Batey. Never once.
> >
> > > > BCAUSE YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT EVIDENCE/TESTIMONY DUMMY ! ! !
> >
> > > > > Now, call me a liar, DiEugenio. I dare ya.
> >
> > > > --
> > > > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> > > > Usenet Newsgroup Service =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0
> > > > =
> =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0
> > > > =3DA0$=3D
> > > 9.95/Month 30GB
> >
> > > You don't know shit about manners, tomnln.
> >
> > > And very little about evidence/testimony either.
> >
> > > Informative Regards,
> >
> > > Tim Brennan
> > > Sydney, Australia
> > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >
> > Here Ya go Criminal Faggot>>>
> >
> > =A0Looks like you're Really upset with me for making you look Bad on
> > thes=
> e>>>
> >
> > SEE>>> =A0 =A0http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
> >
> > SEE>>> =A0 =A0http://whokilledjfk.net/rob_spencer_page.htm
> >
> > SEE>>> =A0http://whokilledjfk.net/guess_who_wrote.htm
> >
> > SEE>>> =A0http://whokilledjfk.net/secret_service_drinking.htm
> >
> > SEE>>> =A0http://whokilledjfk.net/eusebio_azcue.htm
> >
> > --
> > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> > Usenet Newsgroup Service =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
> > =A0$=
> 9.95/Month 30GB
>
--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Gil Jesus
> WHY would i "NOT" Believe that I heard from Azcue's son?
>
> Lying Asshole Rob Spencer then went on to say i was a fool because Azcue did
> nOT have a son.
>
> Jut more proof that LN's never read the official volumes.
>
> Had someone had the HSCA volume III to Spncer he would have known that
> Azcue "DID" have a son who visited the Cuban consulate in Mexico City.
>
> ! !
HERE IT IS, TOM:
Azcue refers to his sons in HSCA Vol. III pg. 140:
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol3/html/HSCA_Vol3_0072b.htm
Silvia Duran refers to Azcue's son at the embassy in HCSA Vol. III
pgs. 109, 115 and 117
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol3/html/HSCA_Vol3_0057a.htm
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol3/html/HSCA_Vol3_0060a.htm
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol3/html/HSCA_Vol3_0061a.htm