On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 5:23:16 PM UTC-7, David Von Pein wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 8:06:43 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 4:51:25 PM UTC-7, David Von Pein wrote:
> > > "LAZ" SAID:
> > >
> > > If all the evidence accumulated by [Doug] Horne doesn't change your opinions one bit, you've earned the title [of "Lone Nut Cocksucker"]. Is there one CTer who has an ounce of respect for McAdams or Von Pein?
> > >
> > >
> > > JASON BURKE SAID:
> > >
> > > Horne? Horne??
> > >
> > >
> > > DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
> > >
> > > Yeah, Jason, I was laughing at "Laz" too. Horne is really a great guy to follow and trust in the JFK case, isn't he? The same guy who said all this crap to me in 2009:
> > >
> > > "Dr. Humes performed the post-mortem surgery on JFK's head wounds before the autopsy. Dr. Boswell simply witnessed it, and drew a diagram of the altered cranial damage following the surgery. .... There were indeed two brain exams, as any thorough timeline analysis (and film analysis) readily reveals." -- Douglas P. Horne; Dec. 19, 2009
> > >
> > >
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-CRURNCAGtHs/WA2TQ37sGdI/AAAAAAABKv4/me5QOBcT-DwnulegNz_lnPYRabFbNCNAgCLcB/s2000/Doug-Horne-Amazon-Post-12-19-2009.png
> > >
> > >
http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/06/doug-horne-part-1.html
> > >
> > > To put it succinctly --- Anyone who believes in the above silliness authored by Douglas P. Horne believes in fantastic things that just simply never happened---nor COULD they have ever happened.
> >
> >
> > Tell us David, do you own the 5 volume set?
> >
> > Have you ever read it?
> >
> > What do you think of people who criticize books they've never read?
The questions were simple:
Tell us David, do you own the 5 volume set?
Have you ever read it?
What do you think of people who criticize books they've never read?
You did answer two of them... you don't own the books, and you've never read them.
Sadly - you refused to answer the third question.
> ALL "JFK Assassination Conspiracy Books" deserve to be criticized, IMO. Every one of them. And that's because (based on the sum total of the evidence in the JFK case) Lee Oswald, by himself, was guilty of 2 murders on 11/22/63.
You're lying again, David.
You'll ABSOLUTELY REFUSE to cite this evidence you refer to.
You'll evade the evidence that shows otherwise...
> Those are the FACTS,
No David, they *AREN'T* facts.
If they were, you'd be citing them at the drop of a hat.
But you don't... you can't.
> and no CTer on the planet (Doug Horne or otherwise) is going to change that bottom-line reality which most CTers refuse to face.
No real critic would *EVER* accept what you just claimed.
You'll refuse to name *anyone* that vaguely could be called a critic that accepts that Lee Harvey Oswald, alone, killed two people on 11/22/63.
Such a person doesn't exist.
And for good reason.
The question was a simple one: What do you think of people who criticize books they've never read?
Why are you afraid to answer that one?