On Thursday, April 6, 2017 at 2:40:17 AM UTC-7, Bud wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 8:49:16 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 3:31:20 PM UTC-7, Bud wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 6:06:52 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> > > > David Von Pein cannot understand any difference between "back of the neck" and the President's upper back...
> > > >
> > > > David complains that it's mere semantics.
> > > >
> > > > But he gets upset at the small semantic difference between "Lone Gunman" and "Conspiracy" - and starts looking around for "lunatics."
> > >
> > > Did this stupid non-point warrant a new post?
> > >
> > > > David never learned this in school... but words mean something. President JFK was shot in the upper back, he was *NOT* shot in the back of the neck.
> > >
> > > Medically speaking it is accurate to say he was shot in the neck. The vertebrae of the neck go down into what is generally considered the back.
> >
> >
> > Nope.
> >
> > There's *NO* medical authority that will assert that T3 or T4 are located in the neck.
>
> Is that where the autopsy placed the wound?
Why would you look to the Autopsy Report?
You don't believe it any more than David does.
The Autopsy Report went out of their way to AVOID being specific... but as you know, Dr. Burkley wrote "verified" on the face sheet, putting the back entry wound around T3/T4
> > > > Every time the Warren Commission makes that claim - they're lying.
> > >
> > > You are retarded. It is not a lie to say that Connally`s chest wound was in his breast or in his chest and it is not a lie to say his leg wound was in the leg or in the thigh. It is just retard quibbling and looking for malfeasance that isn`t there.
> >
> >
> > How does the provable lie told by the Warren Commission reflect on me?
>
> Your stupidity reflects on you.
Is it "stupid" not to be able to answer "Red" or "Green" - I think most people would agree that it is.
And, of course, your ad hominem shows that you have no evidence, and *KNOW* that you don't.
Good of you to implicitly acknowledge the provable lie of the Warren Commission, however...