On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 9:58:18 AM UTC-7, David Von Pein wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 11:04:48 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 7:56:45 AM UTC-7, David Von Pein wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 9:54:02 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> > > > "A surveyor then placed his sighting equipment at the precise point of entry on the back of the president's neck, assuming that the President had been struck at frame 210, and measured the angle to the end of the muzzle of the rifle positioned where it was believed to have been held by the assassin." (WCR 106)
> > > >
> > > > The citations given for this statement, 'WC 5H 153' and 'WC 5H 137' do NOT state that the surveyor "placed his sighting equipment at the precise point of entry on the back of the president's neck..." Indeed, there is no citation possible that will support this statement, since the wound was in JFK's back, not the back of his neck. Utilizing false citation like this to support a lie seems to be a frequent tactic of the WC, as well as supporters of the WC (Posner comes to mind)
> > > >
> > > > Indeed, CE 903,
> > > >
http://historymatters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh18/html/WH_Vol18_0055b.htm which shows this same angle of declination that was measured by the surveyor (17º 43' 30"), fails to show a path beginning at the base of the neck. Note the string in the background, which was set to exactly this declination.
> > > >
> > > > Why did the WC simply lie about what the surveyor did? Could it be that the Warren Commission was just trying to find more "evidence" for their theory? By lying about that evidence?
> > > >
> > > > What is clear, however, is that this is merely another example where the Warren Commission lied...
> > >
> > > CE903 is the very best WC exhibit in existence to prove that the conspiracy clowns like Ben Holmes and Jimmy DiEugenio don't have a leg to stand on when they continue to insist that the WC HAD TO HAVE JFK'S BACK WOUND RAISED TO THE NECK. CE903 proves the CTers are nuts in this regard.
> > >
> > > How?
> > >
> > > By showing that the SBT works perfectly fine with the wound just exactly where we know it was in JFK's body --- the UPPER BACK (not the NECK)....
> > >
> > >
http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/06/sbt-perfection-of-ce903.html
> > >
> > > Choke on it, Ben. Gag real hard on CE903. Because it's proving that you're a kook of the first order.
> >
> > Tut tut tut, David.
> >
> > The Warren Commission stated the "back of the neck."
> >
> > Tell us David, why are you lying about this?
>
> You're getting all hung up on semantics.
Since you assert that you don't care for semantics, welcome to the conspiracy camp.