Open Letter to Tom Hanks
RICLAND
your pro-Bugliosi miniseries is lulu. You see, being a cynic, Tom, the
one thing I hate most in life are fabulously successful people like
yourself.
Lee Harvey Oswald never got a fair trial. Were you a man of integrity
that would have stopped you right there. Men of integrity don't piss on
a dead man's grave, especially a dead man who never got a chance to
defend himself.
Bugliosi does it because Bugliosi is a sc*mbag lawyer who pays
ghostwriters to write his books. Bugliosi is McCarthy all over again --
"Only kooks and pinko commies believe Oswald is innocent!"
Bugliosi has also taken what was heretofore a civil debate and turned it
into commie-baiting and name-calling. He tells us the hundreds of men
and woman who have labored on books meant to reveal the truth are all
pinko kooks -- even ones like Gerald Pozner who agree with him that
Oswald did it.
But unlike Pozner's book, Bugliosi's book is rife with errors,
distortions, and outright lies; a small sample of which I've listed at
my site below.
But, no, don't let the facts get in the way of making millions Tom. Go
forth with your ill-conceived mini-series; go forth spreading Bugliosi
lies, but do so aware of this -- recent studies have shown the Warren
Commission's forensic science was deeply flawed and more such studies
are own the way.
Also, despite Bugliosi's lies that there's nothing else to learn about
the case from the government, yet more CIA documents will be made
public, like the one in which CIA accountant James Wilcott signed an
affidavit claiming Oswald was a paid CIA operative. This information is
also on my site, but don't expect to find it in Vinny's book.
To sum up, Tom, Bugliosi's is playing you like a bass fiddle. You're a
lot younger than he is and that means as the last of the Kennedy era
bureaucrats die and the truth of what happened that day in Dallas begins
seeping out (as it is right now) conspiracy researchers like myself will
be using your for batting practice as we demolish the Bugliosi lies you
help promote.
So, go forth, Tom. Go forth and be Bugliosi's little whore.
Go forth, man.
ric ricland
Max Holland on Bugliosi:
"He is absolutely certain even when he is not necessarily right."
-- Max Holland
---
Reclaiming History -- Bugliosi's Blunders
The Rebuttals to Bugliosi's JFK Assassination Book
http://jfkhit.com
lazu...@webtv.net
several hundred or a thousand letters like this they may have 2nd
thoughts. All the petty infighting amongst Ct's over the years should
have been spent on the media. Obviously, when they review books almost
no one knows anything about the case.
People who just assume in the media Bugliosi is objective-I'd like to
ask them where do you think the headshot struck? if they say near the
cowlick-well no one 11-22-63 said there was a nice neat entrance hole in
an intact cowlick like the one autopsy photo supposedly shows (
there is no definition to the wound actually unlike the Ida dox
drawing), if you think the wound was near the EOP as the autopsy Doctors
stated-how in the world do you have the damage to the top of the head as
seen in Autopsy Photos?( and minute metallic fragments dispersed high in
the skull cavity with FMJ's not supposed to break up) and verified by
Paul O'Conner as what the head looked like upon the start of the
Autopsy...Jeff
David Von Pein
doesn't hesitate to make a jackass out of himself on a regular (daily)
basis.
He has virtually no personal knowledge of any JFK-related info/
evidence. He picks up everything piecemeal and scattershot (and always
via other CTers, whom he believes hook, line, and sinker each and
every time, including notable kooks like David Lifton and Tom The
Nutsack and Benjamin Holmes), without bothering to fact-check any
information.
If a CTer says it's true...by God it's true in Ric's book! No need to
investigate further.
Ric proves every day that a kook with a keyboard is not a very pretty
sight.
(I hope Tom Hanks' 10-hour mini-series makes a billion bucks and
ridicules as many CT-loving kooks as humanly possible in the ten-hour
timespan. Too bad we can't make it a 20-part series.)
justm...@gmail.com
^5 David, couldn't agree with you more. Ricland once again is showing
his jealously towards not only Bugliosi, but also Tom Hanks.
That guilt trip might work on your wife Ricland but you're dealing
with 2 men that are WAY OUT OF YOUR LEAGUE!
You don't have a clue what Tom Hanks preference is in this case, he
might be a CT for all you know. He's making a mini series out of
something that has been unsettled history for almost 44 yrs and he's
going to make millions on it. Kudos to him!!!
I highly doubt Mr. Hanks reads these forums, I'm sure he has better
things to spend his time on.
One thing I am sure of, if he ever saw your ridiculous letter he'd
surely laugh his way to the bank.
Two words for you meathead....GROW UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
muc...@gmail.com
You need to take a vacation.
Ben Holmes
muc...@gmail.com says...
>
>On 25 Jun., 17:54, RICLAND <blackwr...@lycos.com> wrote:
>> I gotta admit I was waiting for you to make a mistake in life, Tom, and
>> your pro-Bugliosi miniseries is lulu. You see, being a cynic, Tom, the
>> one thing I hate most in life are fabulously successful people like
>> yourself.
>>
>> Lee Harvey Oswald never got a fair trial. Were you a man of integrity
>> that would have stopped you right there. Men of integrity don't piss on
>> a dead man's grave, especially a dead man who never got a chance to
>> defend himself.
>>
>> Bugliosi does it because Bugliosi is a sc*mbag lawyer who pays
>> ghostwriters to write his books. Bugliosi is McCarthy all over again --
>> "Only kooks and pinko commies believe Oswald is innocent!"
>>
>> Bugliosi has also taken what was heretofore a civil debate and turned it
>> into commie-baiting and name-calling. He tells us the hundreds of men
>> and woman who have labored on books meant to reveal the truth are all
>> pinko kooks -- even ones like Gerald Pozner who agree with him that
>> Oswald did it.
>>
>> But unlike Pozner's book, Bugliosi's book is rife with errors,
>> distortions, and outright lies;
So too is Posner's. Well documented, in fact. Seems like I did well to
killfile Ricland - he simply can't be honest.
Bud
RICLAND wrote:
> I gotta admit I was waiting for you to make a mistake in life, Tom,
Did you see "Castaway"?
> and
> your pro-Bugliosi miniseries is lulu. You see, being a cynic, Tom, the
> one thing I hate most in life are fabulously successful people like
> yourself.
I don`t see the connection between hating successful people, and
being cynical.
> Lee Harvey Oswald never got a fair trial.
Neither did Hitler.
> Were you a man of integrity
> that would have stopped you right there. Men of integrity don't piss on
> a dead man's grave, especially a dead man who never got a chance to
> defend himself.
Especially a dead man who killed other people without giving them
much chance to defend themselves.
> Bugliosi does it because Bugliosi is a sc*mbag lawyer who pays
> ghostwriters to write his books. Bugliosi is McCarthy all over again --
> "Only kooks and pinko commies believe Oswald is innocent!"
Idiots also. And assholes. There is a lot of overlap.
> Bugliosi has also taken what was heretofore a civil debate and turned it
> into commie-baiting and name-calling. He tells us the hundreds of men
> and woman who have labored on books meant to reveal the truth are all
> pinko kooks -- even ones like Gerald Pozner who agree with him that
> Oswald did it.
>
> But unlike Pozner's book, Bugliosi's book is rife with errors,
> distortions, and outright lies; a small sample of which I've listed at
> my site below.
>
> But, no, don't let the facts get in the way of making millions Tom. Go
> forth with your ill-conceived mini-series; go forth spreading Bugliosi
> lies, but do so aware of this -- recent studies have shown the Warren
> Commission's forensic science was deeply flawed and more such studies
> are own the way.
>
> Also, despite Bugliosi's lies that there's nothing else to learn about
> the case from the government, yet more CIA documents will be made
> public, like the one in which CIA accountant James Wilcott signed an
> affidavit claiming Oswald was a paid CIA operative. This information is
> also on my site, but don't expect to find it in Vinny's book.
>
> To sum up, Tom, Bugliosi's is playing you like a bass fiddle. You're a
> lot younger than he is and that means as the last of the Kennedy era
> bureaucrats die and the truth of what happened that day in Dallas begins
> seeping out (as it is right now) conspiracy researchers like myself will
> be using your for batting practice as we demolish the Bugliosi lies you
> help promote.
If this doesn`t convince Hanks this min-series needs doing, nothing
will.
> So, go forth, Tom. Go forth and be Bugliosi's little whore.
>
> Go forth, man.
Groovy.