VIDEO: MARINA SAYS OSWALD DIDN'T KILL ANYONE
Gil Jesus
Cdddraftsman ( Tom Lowry ) posted:
.John : The most damning testimony about LHO came from his wife
Marina ...... ! CTer authors have attacked this testimony, pointing
out that Marina was a recent immigrant to the US, was fearful of the
authorities and
spoke English very poorly. These criticisms are well taken, but they
don't apply to her testimony before the HSCA. ( Tom Lowry, 9/25/09 )
David Von Pein claims that Jim DiEugenio is a "kook" because he said
in the debate with McAdams that he believed that Oswald killed neither
Kennedy nor Tippit.
I guess he's going to have to add Marina to his list of "kooks".
LET'S SEE WHAT SHE SAYS WHEN SHE NOT INTIMIDATED BY THE
GOVERNMENT......... in her OWN words:
Marina Oswald Porter says that her late husband, Lee Harvey Oswald was
"absolutely innocent" of murdering President Kennedy and Dallas Police
officer J.D. Tippit. She claims that she and all Americans were lied
to by the Federal Government and requests the release of all remaining
documents on the assassination.
Gil Jesus
uh oh Lowry.........there goes your "star" witness
In her OWN words and NOT under the threat of deportation
LONG after the HSCA:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ueT6j86qqo
watch it and weep...........ROFLMAO
David Von Pein
>>> "David Von Pein claims that Jim DiEugenio is a "kook" because he said in the debate with McAdams that he believed that Oswald killed neither Kennedy nor Tippit. I guess he's going to have to add Marina to his list of "kooks". .... Marina Oswald Porter says that her late husband, Lee Harvey Oswald, was "absolutely innocent" of murdering President Kennedy and Dallas Police officer J.D. Tippit. She claims that she and all Americans were lied to by the Federal Government and requests the release of all remaining documents on the assassination." <<<
Of course, as we all know, Marina Oswald was fairly certain of her
husband's guilt back in the 1960s. It was only many years later that
she began to change her opinion.
In early 1964, just two months after the assassination, Marina was
interviewed for the first time on television (by Eddie Barker of KRLD-
TV in Dallas). Here's what Marina told Barker:
EDDIE BARKER -- "Marina, do you believe that your husband killed
President Kennedy?"
MARINA OSWALD -- "I don't want to believe [it]. But I have too much
facts; and facts tell me that Lee shot Kennedy."
http://media2.myfoxdfw.com/html/JFKvideo/video/jfk014.html
-------------------
"No one knew [Lee Harvey] Oswald as well as his wife,
Marina. .... Marina told [author Priscilla] McMillan that when she
visited her husband in jail on the day after the assassination, she
came away knowing he was guilty. .... [Marina] said she knew that had
he been innocent, he would have been screaming to high heaven for his
"rights," claiming he had been mistreated and demanding to see
officials at the very highest levels." -- Page 962 of "Reclaiming
History" by Vincent Bugliosi (c.2007)
www.ReclaimingHistory.blogspot.com
-------------------
"Marina could tell that he was guilty. If he hadn't been, she
thought, he would have been loudly protesting his arrest, and besides,
she sensed that he was saying goodbye to her with his eyes." -- Page
249 of "Oswald's Game" by Jean Davison (c.1983)
-------------------
I wonder if Marina Oswald (as well as all other conspiracy theorists
who currently hold the opinion that Lee Oswald was "absolutely
innocent" of killing both JFK and J.D. Tippit) has ever examined the
situation in the following light:
What are the chances of Lee Harvey Oswald being innocent of shooting
both President Kennedy and Officer Tippit when all of these things are
factored into the equation?:
1.) A man named Lee Harvey Oswald suddenly leaves his workplace at the
Texas School Book Depository approximately three minutes after JFK was
shot with rifle bullets which came from that very same building (the
TSBD).
2.) A Mannlicher-Carcano rifle is found on the sixth floor of the TSBD
just 52 minutes after JFK was shot with rifle bullets. And that
Carcano rifle was owned by the same man who left the TSBD within a few
minutes of the assassination -- Lee Harvey Oswald.
3.) Officer J.D. Tippit is shot and killed by a LONE GUNMAN on Tenth
Street approximately 45 minutes after JFK was murdered.
4.) A man named Lee Harvey Oswald is arrested in a movie theater
approximately 35 minutes after Tippit is killed. Oswald brandishes a
revolver before he is subdued by Dallas police officers.
5.) The gun that Oswald had on him in the movie theater is the same
gun that was proven to be the gun that was used to kill Officer J.D.
Tippit.
And even if conspiracy theorists want to eliminate the two "Poe
shells" from the evidence pile, it still wouldn't make any difference,
because the OTHER TWO BULLET SHELLS found at the scene of Tippit's
murder are more than enough, all by themselves, to hang Oswald for
Tippit's murder. And this is true because we know for a fact that ONLY
ONE PERSON (identified as Lee Oswald by multiple witnesses) was seen
dumping bullet shells from ONE gun on Tenth Street in Oak Cliff.
Futhermore, we also know that there was ONLY ONE SINGLE GUN utilized
to kill Officer Tippit, which was positively the gun from which spent
shells were being dumped onto the ground immediately after the Tippit
shooting (as seen by the various witnesses).
And since only ONE GUN was having its empty shells dumped onto the
ground near the corner of Tenth & Patton on 11/22/63, it stands to
reason that even if only ONE of those spent shells could be linked
conclusively to a particular gun, that fact must mean that ALL of the
OTHER shells that were found on the ground that same day HAD TO HAVE
ALSO COME FROM THAT SAME GUN.
The only possible way that the above paragraph could be false would be
if a few bullet shells had ALREADY been in the yard of Barbara and
Virginia Davis BEFORE Tippit's killer decided to dump some ADDITIONAL
shells in that exact same area on November 22nd.
And I doubt very much that even a really crazy conspiracy theorist
(like Jim Garrison, for example) would ever attempt to foist such a
nutty and unbelievable scenario on the American public.
Therefore, even without the two "Poe" shells in evidence at all, it's
obvious that Oswald is guilty of killing Tippit....because it's also
obvious (from the eyewitness record in the case) that only ONE MAN was
dumping shells from ONE GUN in the vicinity of the Tippit slaying on
November 22, 1963.
And who was that "one man"? It was Lee Harvey Oswald.
How can we know this with total certainty?
Because:
Lee Harvey Oswald, when he was apprehended in the Texas Theater just
35 minutes after Tippit was shot, had in his hands the very same gun
that was conclusively linked to the two "non-Poe" bullet shells at the
scene of Tippit's murder.
The above sentence, all by itself, makes Lee H. Oswald guilty of
killing Officer Tippit beyond all reasonable doubt.
Or do some inventive conspiracists actually think that it's likely
that Oswald DIDN'T shoot J.D. Tippit, even though LHO had the Tippit
murder weapon ON HIM just thirty-five minutes later? I doubt that any
CTer would be so silly as to try and float such nonsense and then
expect any reasonable person to actually believe it was true.
When adding up #1 through #5 above, we can come to the following
conclusions:
The man who murdered Officer Tippit is the very same man who departed
the building from where rifle shots were fired at President Kennedy
within a few minutes of JFK's assassination.
And the man who killed Tippit also just happens to be the very same
man who owned the rifle that was found in the TSBD shortly after JFK's
murder.
And that man's name is -- Lee Harvey Oswald.
(And I haven't even talked about the fact that this same man's
[Oswald's] FRESH fingerprints were located all over various articles
on the sixth floor of the Book Depository right after the
assassination, including fingerprints that were found DEEP WITHIN THE
GUNMAN'S SNIPER'S NEST.)
Anyway, I just wonder if Marina Oswald-Porter has ever looked at the
situation (and the evidence) in the above-mentioned logical fashion?
I'd be willing to bet she hasn't.
In other words -- What are the odds of having all of these things
happening this way and yet still having Lee Harvey Oswald being
innocent of killing both Kennedy and Tippit?
Sam McClung
the unsigned typewritten deposition produced by the warren commission for
marina oswald?
(hint: what are unsigned documents worth?)
or
marina oswald herself?
seems that video ended before marina, in that same footage interview,
indicated the citizens of the usa should examine their government, if memory
serves
mucher1
Are you implying that deportation was still an issue (at least in her
mind) some 15 years after the event? Can you expand on this?
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ueT6j86qqo
I'm afraid she doesn't come across as someone who's (after 40+ years)
finally able to speak the truth. Rather as someone who may have spent
a little too much time with conspiracy researchers. However, who can
blame her for preferring to believe that whatever triggered the
assassination had nothing to do with the deterioration of her marriage
with Oswald?
Has Marina ever actually retracted or corrected any of the things she
said while she was "under the threat of deportation"? Just
wondering...
> watch it and weep...........ROFLMAO
Acting like a troll must be highly enjoyable.
timstter
Wow! This guy must be really religious, going around and posting stuff
like this on public newsgroups. What a devout fellow! No wonder his
surname is Jesus.
Admiring Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
Gil Jesus
Gil Jesus
aeffects
gotta be tough being a fraud and a liar ain't it timstter, er Rob
Spencer St. John Fisher College (uppah nu yawk).... I would'nt spend
to much time who is and who isn't religious, you need to spend your
time pondering being a LIAR.....
Grow some nads, own up like the good little nutter-troll ya are....
p.s. .john will forgive ya!
Kindest regards...