In article <
c4000975-5463-4ca8...@i6g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
Walt says...
>
>On Feb 26, 9:50=A0am, Bud <
sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
>> On Feb 26, 10:01=A0am, Walt <
papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Feb 26, 3:29=A0am, Bud <
sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
>>
>> > > On Feb 25, 8:47=A0pm, Walt <
papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote:
>>
>> > > > On Feb 25, 6:14=A0pm, Bud <
sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > On Feb 25, 6:18=A0pm, Walt <
papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > On Feb 25, 4:07=A0pm, Bud <
sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > On Feb 25, 4:44=A0pm, Walt <
papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote=
>:
>>
>> > > > > > > > On Feb 25, 4:31=A0am, Bud <
sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > On Feb 24, 7:36=A0pm, Walt <
papakochenb...@evertek.net> w=
>rote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > On Feb 24, 4:23=A0pm, bigdog <
jecorbett1...@yahoo.com> =
>wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 24, 3:35=A0pm, Walt <
papakochenb...@evertek.ne=
>t> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 10:45=A0am, bigdog <jecorbett1...@yahoo.=
>com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 10:22=A0am, Walt <papakochenb...@evert=
>
ek.net> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 7:03=A0am, bigdog <jecorbett1...@yah=
>
oo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 19, 7:17=A0pm, Walt <papakochenb...@ev=
>
ertek.net> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 19, 3:43=A0pm, bigdog <jecorbett1...=
>@
yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 19, 11:19=A0am, Walt <papakochenb.=
>..@
evertek.net> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's a link to a photo of the SN as i=
>t appeared at about 1:15 on the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > afternoon of 11 ?22 /63.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > =A0
http://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/675=
>31/metapth49531/
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This photo never appeared in the offici=
>al LBJ approved lie that was
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > released to the public in September 196=
>4. Ten months after the murder
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of President John Kennedy. =A0The reaso=
>n this photo and several
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > companion photos were never printed in =
>the Warren report is because
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > they are authentic photos of the imagin=
>ary "Sniper's Nest". =A0These
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > photos show that it would have been phy=
>sically impossible for Lee
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oswald to have shot President Kennedy i=
>n the back of the head as LBJ's
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Select Blue Ribbon Committee" charged.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On page 138 and 139 there is a couple o=
>f photos that the authorities
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > created after they murdered Lee Oswald.=
> =A0The photo on page 138 was
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > taken at night by the DPD. It is a dish=
>onest "re-construction of the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so called "Sniper's Nest". =A0It is int=
>ended to fool the viewer into
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > believing that they found Lee Oswald's =
>prints on the boxes behind the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > window, and trick the unwary into belie=
>ving the lie that Lee Oswald
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > murdered JFK.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We'll compare the authentic photo with =
>the fake photo and the viewer
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will be able to see with his own eyes t=
>hat Lee Oswald was framed.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you ever get tired of proving what a d=
>umbfuck you are. Apparently
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not.-
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nothing but ad hominem..... Typical respons=
>e from a person who has no
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other way of attempting to refute the facts=
>.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > been smoking. If you think that is a smoker=
>'s nook, one has to wonder what you've
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The three spent shells and the eyewitnesses who=
> saw a
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rifleman in that window are ample proof it wa=
>s used for something
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other than someone trying to sneak a smoke.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Some ignorant fool wrote:......If you think tha=
>t is a smoker's nook,
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > one has to wonder what you've
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > been smoking.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear mr ignorant of the facts..... =A0It is a f=
>act that the cops picked
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > up an empty Viceroy cigarette package and some =
>cigarette butts from
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the floor in the Smokers Nook.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > No one has said that it was never used to sneak a=
> smoke. I said it was
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > used for something quite a bit more significant a=
>t 12:30 on 11/22/63.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > It may well have been an out of the way corner wh=
>ere somebody could
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > sneak a smoke undetected. That would also make it=
> an ideal place for
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > an assassin to hide undetected.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > =A0An ignorant idiot wrote:....." No one has said t=
>hat it was never used
>> > > > > > > > > > > > to sneak a smoke."
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Idiot.....Thank you for displaying your ignora=
>nce about the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > imaginary "Sniper's Nest"..... The authorities clai=
>ned that Lee Oswald
>> > > > > > > > > > > > constructed the so called "Sniper's Nest". And he b=
>uilt it to conceal
>> > > > > > > > > > > > himself from anybody who might encounter him while =
>he was preparing to
>> > > > > > > > > > > > shoot JFK. =A0THAT'S the lie they created..... And =
>since Lee Oswald
>> > > > > > > > > > > > didn't smoke, who would have used it as a place to =
>"sneak a smoke" ?
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Are you suggesting that Oswald was a smoker but jus=
>t lied about it and
>> > > > > > > > > > > > concealed his habit from everybody?
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > Nobody should be surprised at your lack of reading co=
>mprehension or
>> > > > > > > > > > > your ability to read things into things that were nev=
>er said. It is
>> > > > > > > > > > > not known whether Oswald configured the boxes to crea=
>te the sniper's
>> > > > > > > > > > > nest or simply took advantage of what was already the=
>re.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > Very good.....So you now admit that we were being lied =
>to when the
>> > > > > > > > > > authorities told us that Lee Harvey Oswald ( they usual=
>ly used his
>> > > > > > > > > > full entire name with a sinister artticulation) built t=
>hat imaginary
>> > > > > > > > > > "Sniper's Nest". =A0Is it because you were cornered and=
> were forced to
>> > > > > > > > > > admit the the cigarette butts and the empty cigarette p=
>ack is proof
>> > > > > > > > > > that some other person built and used the cubby hole as=
> a hidden
>> > > > > > > > > > Smoker's Nook.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > =A0 You still haven`t supported that the cigarette butts =
>and pack was
>> > > > > > > > > found in the SN.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > Now then perhaps you'd like to explain WHY the cops did=
>n't attempt to
>> > > > > > > > > > determine WHO that other person was?? =A0Wouldn't it ha=
>ve essential for
>> > > > > > > > > > an honest investigation to attempt to determine who had=
> used that area
>> > > > > > > > > > they called a "Sniper's Nest". =A0 =A0 =A0I mean IF it =
>truely was a sniper's
>> > > > > > > > > > nest shouldn't they have questioned everyone who may ha=
>ve used that
>> > > > > > > > > > area? =A0 Why did they focus on Oswald only??
>>
>> > > > > > > > > =A0 Why would they focus on people who didn`t shoot Kenne=
>dy?
>>
>> > > > > > > > Hmmmmm... Is this really what passes for logical thinking f=
>or you??
>>
>> > > > > > > =A0 You think it`s logical to focus on people who didn`t shoo=
>t Kennedy?
>>
>> > > > > > > > I'm surprised that you would admit that the cops knew that =
>Lee Oswald
>> > > > > > > > was the designated patsy, so there was no need to investiga=
>te and
>> > > > > > > > determine who the other people were who used that cubby hol=
>e.
>>
>> > > > > > > =A0 The determined who used it to shoot Kennedy from. Oswald.
>>
>> > > > > > Well not exactly......They just said that Oswald was guilty, wi=
>thout
>> > > > > > bothering to investigate any other leads.
>> > > > > > You probably don't understand ......but an honest and proper
>> > > > > > investigation would have determined
>>
>> > > > > =A0 That Oswald was their man with only two or three of the dozen=
>s of
>> > > > > indications they had early on.
>>
>> > > > > >who had left the cigarette butts
>> > > > > > and the empty cigarette package on the floor in that cubby hole=
>.
>>
>> > > > > =A0 You haven`t supported where those items were found.
>>
>> > > > > >=A0 If
>> > > > > > there really had been a conspirator up there it can't be argued=
> that
>> > > > > > he wouldn't have been very nervous, and probably have smoked a =
>few
>> > > > > > cigarettes while awaiting the motorcade. =A0 ( At least that wo=
>uld be a
>> > > > > > logical path to follow) =A0 But the cops didn't even bother to =
>determine
>> > > > > > who had left that evidence up there.....they just picked a non-=
>smoker
>> > > > > > and said he was guilty.
>>
>> > > > > =A0 They didn`t "just pick" Oswald, retard. You are so out of tou=
>ch with
>> > > > > reality there is no point even talking to you.
>>
>> > > > Wrong......YOU are the one who is totally out of touch..... They mo=
>st
>> > > > certainly DID pick Lee Oswald. =A0You've probably conveniently forg=
>otten
>> > > > that Roy Truly =A0"picked" Oswald as a suspect and told Fritz that
>> > > > Oswald was unaccounted for, even though he'd seen Lee Oswald calmly
>> > > > drinking a coke in the lunchroom just seconds after the shooting.
>>
>> > > =A0 Truly didn`t see Oswald during the shooting, only Brennan did.
>> > A lying idiot wrote:...."Truly didn`t see Oswald during the shooting,
>>
>> > only Brennan did."
>>
>> > Deat lying idiot, Howard Brennan did NOT see Lee Oswald during the
>> > shooting.....
>>
>> He said he did. He was there, retard, not you.
>
>Brennan DESCRIBED a man who was NOT Lee Oswald, he DESCRIBED a gun
>that was NOT a Mannlicher Carcano, and he DESCRIBED a site that was
>NOT the SE corner window. These are FACTs liar........
Unfortunately, you can't argue with liars... all you can do is point out that
they are lying.
>> > Howard Brennan saw a man who was in his early thirties,
>> > (LHO early twenties) who weighed as much as 175 pounds (LHO 140) who
>> > was dressed in light colored clothing ( LHO dressed in dark colored
>> > clothing) Why do you lie...... are you insane?
>>
>> Brennan recognized Oswald as the slender
>> ...