>>> "Would that be the FBI evidence? The FBI-CIA psych-ops technique of relying on the public's "presumption of regularity" for FBI-CIA and other government controlled investigators to convince the public that the "official" government investigators were just doing their regular work and collecting "evidence" in a regular way and were reliable and trustworthy and told the truth about what had happened in Dealey Plaza on 11/22/63." <<<

Oh for God sake, what a load of feces.

>>> "We now know the FBI can and will frame anyone they choose with bogus "evidence"." <<<

Oh for God sake. Another load of excrement. Nice. The pot's filling
up. Better flush.

>>> "So should we reject the FBI testimony about the "evidence"? ... That seems a reasonable position at this point, don't you think? <<<

But the FBI didn't collect any of the first-day evidence in the JFK
case. The DPD did. Are they all crooks and liars too? Was all of the
DPD-collected evidence "switched" conveniently for LHO-implicating
stuff by the evil and dastardly Federal Bureau of Investigation?

If so, why the hell would they even WANT to frame the man they should
have had a better eye on (a certain Mr. Oswald, that is)?

Getting Oswald OFF the murdering hook would be much better for J.
Edgar and his boys than it would have been to FRAME AN INNOCENT
OSWALD. Correct? (Of course it's correct.)

Can any reasonable person really believe such nonsense about the big,
bad FBI and the JFK case?

If you can't believe such nonsense, then the evidence is valid....and
Oswald's certainly guilty. That seems a reasonable position at this
point, don't you think?

David Von Pein

unread,

Apr 4, 2008, 12:52:31 AM4/4/08

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_thread/thread/a2a4784d6ae52dfd/1943bc0a53460789?#1943bc0a53460789

>>> "It was the FBI and SS which collected the bullets and fragments, not the DPD." <<<

Yes, that's correct. Good point. (Although it doesn't apply to any of
the
Tippit bullets and fragments.)

Which, of course, would really make it a THREE-TIERED (3-TEAM) EFFORT
of
complicity in this case if a whole lot of the ballistics (and other)
evidence had really been faked or switched or what-have-you.

How likely is it that the DPD and the FBI and the SS got together and
decided to ALL become crooks in a coordinated effort to frame an
innocent
patsy on 11/22? Not very.

Plus....with respect to Jim Lewis' earlier remarks re. the FBI
specifically, I wasn't really off base with respect to the bullets
found
by non-DPD entities. The FBI found none of the ballistics stuff first
(save the tiny fragments under Nellie's seat). It was either the DPD
or
the USSS who initially handled CE399/567/569.

>>> "Incompetence can explain almost as many things." <<<

I wonder if any CTers who think CE399 was "planted/switched" (which is
almost 100% of all CTers by my latest count...at least on forums such
as
this) think it would have been possible for mere "incompetence" to
explain
away the "planting" of a bullet?

Clever and wise one minute.....incompetent beyond all belief the next.
This is the strange, upside-down world that so many CTers reside in
daily
when attempting to reconcile their skewed beliefs with respect to the
authorities who investigated the Kennedy murder.

Go figure.

>>> "The DPD could not have had a better eye on Oswald, because as they explained in a press conference, the FBI had not notified the DPD of his presence in Dallas." <<<

Yeah? So? You're confused. My earlier comment said nothing about the
DPD
knowing of LHO on 11/22. It was all about the FBI knowing of Oz's
presence
in Dallas.

>>> "Can any sane person fall for your strawman arguments?" <<<

And can Tony M. get through just one post without using the word
"strawman"? (Highly doubtful.)

0 new messages