Oliver Stone To Make New JFK Assassination Film
lazu...@webtv.net
segment on the Assassination in his History Special for Showtime Channel
sometime around summer-let's hope he can put on Douglas, Newman, Di
Eugenio, Groden etc...Laz
mucher1
Actually, I thought this was one of your more believable posts. You
guys are like April 1st all year round.
lazu...@webtv.net
bigdog
Have some new lies come to light since his last JFK movie?
David Von Pein
>>> "Have some new lies come to light since his last JFK movie?" <<<
Oh, sure. Think "Doug Horne".
A lot of Horne's tripe is recycled from David Lifton's horse hockey,
of course, but Horne adds his own imprint of insanity and expands upon
Lifton's excrement -- e.g., suggesting that Dr. Humes altered JFK's
body himself at Bethesda before the autopsy.
Can anyone think of even ONE other person on the planet who believes
(or could even BEGIN to believe) that Dr. James Humes engaged in such
a monstrous act of conspiracy on the night of JFK's death?
I have yet to hear ONE single conspiracy theorist (other than Doug
Horne) come out and specifically say: "I think Dr. Humes altered
Kennedy's body".
Not even the conspiracy theorists who have given Horne's book high
praise in a general, overall "attaboy" manner (such as Vince Palamara,
who actually had the nads to suggest that Horne should receive a
Pulitzer Prize for his work of outlandish fiction on the JFK case)
have come out and specifically said they THEMSELVES believe that Dr.
Humes fiddled around with JFK's wounds prior to the autopsy.
I think it's probably a case of the common syndrome that we often see
amongst CTers, which could be classified in this general fashion --
"I'LL PRAISE ANY BOOK AND ANY THEORY AS LONG AS IT PROMOTES A JFK
CONSPIRACY AND BASHES THE WARREN COMMISSION".
But what I would like to hear from some OTHER conspiracy theorists
(other than Doug Horne) is their specific belief that Horne is 100%
correct about Dr. Humes performing pre-autopsy surgery on the head of
John F. Kennedy at Bethesda Naval Hospital on 11/22/63.
In fact, I'd like to challenge ANY fan of Douglas P. Horne's five
volumes to put it in WRITING, in plain and simple English, their
belief that Jim Humes altered President Kennedy's wounds.
Is there any conspiracist who is willing to actually endorse Doug
Horne's SPECIFIC THEORY ABOUT DR. JAMES J. HUMES?
If there is such a CTer on the planet, I'd enjoy having his or her
identity revealed. It might prove quite illuminating.
=====================================================
THE FANTASIES OF DOUGLAS P. HORNE:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/0e2e36113ce98e6b
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/155a3a578f5005f5
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/2bdfb1d377432d7e
=====================================================
timstter
> Yeah..hilarious Mucher..you ought to try stand up with Von Pein......Laz
Why don't you stick to ping pong, Laz?
Helpful Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
lazu...@webtv.net
the magic bullet theory, the neuromuscular reaction, the jet effect, the
intact back of the head at the autopsy,the backyard photos are
genuine,JFK wasn't pulling out of Vietnam,no shots were fired from the
grassy knoll,ZFilm wasn't altered, Oswald didn't have inumerable CIA
connections,and a ton more...Laz
bigdog
CUCKOO!!! CUCKOO!!! CUCKOO!!!
Gil Jesus
>
> CUCKOO!!! � CUCKOO!!! � CUCKOO!!!
Your true colors finally show through.
Gil Jesus
> Gotcha..April Fools......Laz
You can't do the April Fools thing on people who believe everything
they're told.
It's way too advanced for their primitive follow-the-leader minds.
You tryin' to screw them up ?
ROFLMAO
Sam Brown
"Gil Jesus" <gjj...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:682d6c0f-e8dc-4a4c...@k19g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> Gotcha..April Fools......Laz
ROFLMAO
Did you buy that worthless heap on crap from ebay on April Fools day Girly?
ROTFLMAO!
bigdog
Do you have any more information on Dr. Perry's heart massage of JFK?
ROFLMFAO!!!
mucher1
As remarked by Bob Harris in another thread, April Fools' jokes are
supposed to be something that would surprise us. However--and this
SHOULDN'T come as a surprise to you--we already knew that you were
grossly incompetent as a "researcher". Oh, and another thing about
April Fools' jokes: they're supposed to be made on the day of April
1st! Since your little faux pas was made on March 31st, I think it's
pretty safe to conclude that it wasn't an intentional joke.
PS: April Fools' jokes are usually of a declarative nature, while your
"joke" was in the form of yet another foolish challenge in your
pathetic series of "QUESTIONS FOR THE LONE NUTCASES".
PPS: You're not exactly known (around these parts at least) for your
self-deprecating humour. Your nasty little "jokes" seem to ALWAYS be
at other people's expense--never your own.
Jeff
That's actually a good idea for a movie.
A lot of new information has come out since Stone's movie.
Jeff
Steve
I agree, I too hope they put Groden, Lifton, Horne, and other nuts on
screen along with Bugliosi showing the logical and factual errors in
their theories. Of course the poorly-read and the perennially
gullible of the world will believe all the conspiracy hogwash but
among the more logical and literate in the populace, exposure will be
the best antiseptic for conspiracy fantasies. Putting Groden on the
witness stand during the Simpson civil trial was all clear-thinking
people needed to hear to discern his ridiculous theories from factual
events. Additionally, after Jack White was exposed as a fake and a
pseudo-expert by the HSCA he too fell from grace among the well-read
and well-educated. Only the conspiracy dummies still give either of
these two charlatans any credence. When Old Man Rosstard appeared
with Dr. McAdams it revealed how weak his theories are when confronted
with logic and evidence.
So I say bring the nuts on, but allow real scholars to counter their
claims and let the public decide. Exposure is the best way to expose
the lies of the conspiracy nuts out there.
Jeff
>
> So I say bring the nuts on, but allow real scholars to counter their
> claims and let the public decide. Exposure is the best way to expose
> the lies of the conspiracy nuts out there.
Well I hope fate allows me to make a movie about this case. If I make
this movie it will be shocking. With this story someone could get
killed every 5 minutes for a four hour movie.
I would have to include the sex angle like show Johnson making out
with his mistress in the oval office.
That's what people want to see after all. Action and sex.
It is probably only in Hollywood that the truth can ever be told. The
government will never admit that they were ultimately responsible. Or
at least a rogue element within the government.
I have all of the material I need to make this movie. All I need is
those 9 episodes of the DVD set 'The Men Who Killed Kennedy'.
Another good movie plot would be the Jon Benet Ramsey murder.
The Bill Clinton / Monica saga would be another possibility. I have
never understood why Clinton wasn't impeached and sent to jail.
Some people think there are similarities between the JFK conspiracy
and the WhiteWater conspiracy down in Arkansas that the Clintons have
been associated with. I recall that one lady was so terrified about
testifying in court about White Water she chose to go to jail instead.
Jeff
bigdog
> On Apr 6, 3:18 pm, Steve <sahist...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > So I say bring the nuts on, but allow real scholars to counter their
> > claims and let the public decide. Exposure is the best way to expose
> > the lies of the conspiracy nuts out there.
>
> Well I hope fate allows me to make a movie about this case. If I make
> this movie it will be shocking. With this story someone could get
> killed every 5 minutes for a four hour movie.
>
> I would have to include the sex angle like show Johnson making out
> with his mistress in the oval office.
>
> That's what people want to see after all. Action and sex.
>
> It is probably only in Hollywood that the truth can ever be told. The
> government will never admit that they were ultimately responsible. Or
> at least a rogue element within the government.
>
The government wasn't responsible. One little piece of shit named Lee
Harvey Oswald was 100% responsible for the murder of JFK. Oh, yeah. He
killed a cop too.
> I have all of the material I need to make this movie. All I need is
> those 9 episodes of the DVD set 'The Men Who Killed Kennedy'.
>
Good fucking luck.
> Another good movie plot would be the Jon Benet Ramsey murder.
>
It doesn't surprise me that you would be fascinated by one of the most
overhyped stories of recent times. Why was the murder of this one
little girl more important than all the other child murders that were
committed during the same time. The murder of that little girl was a
despicable tragedy, but no more so than any other similar tragedies
that didn't receive a fraction of the public attention.
> The Bill Clinton / Monica saga would be another possibility. I have
> never understood why Clinton wasn't impeached and sent to jail.
>
Clinton was impeached, dumbfuck.
> Some people think there are similarities between the JFK conspiracy
> and the WhiteWater conspiracy down in Arkansas that the Clintons have
> been associated with. I recall that one lady was so terrified about
> testifying in court about White Water she chose to go to jail instead.
>
>
Yes, she took a bullet for Clinton. Loyalty is an admirable trait,
even when misguided.