Yes, and Jesse Curry agreed with you because he OFFICIAL evidence
photo ONLY shows two shell casings.
The clueless kook named Rossley can't even spell "only".
Two things you DID Know !
1 How to spell it correctly.
2 Smart enough to RUN from it.
HERE's what you Snipped outta FEAR>>>
LOL! Old tomnln must be about the only buff in the world to ACTUALLY
believe that only two shells were found.
Not surprising since he swallowed the Mark Lane *fink* report as
genuine.
KUTGW, tomnln!
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
Timmy wrote;
LOL! Old tomnln must be about the only buff in the world to ACTUALLY
believe that only two shells were found.
Not surprising since he swallowed the Mark Lane *fink* report as
genuine.
KUTGW, tomnln!
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
I write;
LOL! Alias Timmy has to be the ONLY gal in the world who does NOT recognize
an "Official FBI Exhibit".
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/only_2_shells_found.htm
Alias Eusebio Azcue has to be the ONLY gal in the world who does NOT know
Azcue has a Son.
Alias Rob Spencer has to be the ONLY gal in the world who was FORCED to
change her name by her own Family !
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/rob_spencer_page.htm
Gotta question Timmy's masculinity when he Loves gettin it shoved up his ass
at a ratio of 14 to 1! ! !
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Typical LNer stuff here folks - Dave Von Con CAN'T address the
evidence so he resorts to "spelling comments". Like all the adults
here do not know how ONLY is spelled, huh?
Nice try Dave Von Con, but NO cigar for you.
IT is NOT our belief DumpsterCon, it is what the OFFICIAL evidence
photo SHOWS! Please explain that for us, and don't use the old
"Fritz had it in his pocket" excuse because this sinks you even
faster.
> Not surprising since he swallowed the Mark Lane *fink* report as
> genuine.
>
> KUTGW, tomnln!
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Maybe DVP would like me to post ALL of his Typo's on my website?????
The same DVP who Refused to debate on the radio ! ! !
IT is NOT our belief DumpsterCon, it is what the OFFICIAL evidence
photo SHOWS! Please explain that for us, and don't use the old
"Fritz had it in his pocket" excuse because this sinks you even
faster.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timmy/Rob/Eusebio is Finally Rejecting "Official FBI Exhibits" ! ! ! !
He's one of those 10%'s (kinda like Circumcism)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the last vestiage of a coward, spelling... carry on da Dave *shithead*
Reitzes, aka David Von Pein!
George 'Robbie' Spencer St. John Fisher College (uppah nu yawk state -
don'tcha know) how's is it hanging shithead?
I'll be at Cornell (Ithaca) soon, shall we do coffee? Perhaps share
Zapruder film versions...? LMFAO!
LOL.
Rossley The Retard knows full well what happened to the third bullet
shell. And so do all of the other conspiracy-happy morons in this acj
place.
The shell didn't disappear. And there was nothing "conspiratorial"
about it whatsoever. Captain Fritz retained the bullet shell in his
desk because he wanted to be sure he had one of the shells there in
Dallas for future tests (if needed).
Simple as that.
To believe in the nutty "Only 2 Shells Were Found" nonsense, Rossley
The Retard is going to have to call a lot of people liars who said
there were THREE shells in the Sniper's Nest.
But I'm sure that accusing a bunch of cops of being rotten, scheming
liars and evidence-manipulators is just par for the kook course when
it comes to the beliefs of Rossley. That idiot thinks everybody in
Texas was out to frame poor Oswald in 1963.
Plus -- Kook Rossley is going to have believe that there's something
"fishy" going on with this picture (which he no doubt does think--
because he's a big idiot):
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0124a.htm
>>> "Nice try Dave Von Con, but NO cigar for you." <<<
I don't smoke anyway. So you can keep your cigar (or stuff it
somewhere). Take your pick of cigar options.
www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,776.msg9299.html#msg9299
Hey Dave, long time, no speak. I think.
> Rossley The Retard knows full well what happened to the third bullet
> shell. And so do all of the other conspiracy-happy morons in this acj
> place.
This should be good. Pay attention to the con folks. How appropriate
were are talking abouts "shells" as Con men love the "shell game."
> The shell didn't disappear. And there was nothing "conspiratorial"
> about it whatsoever. Captain Fritz retained the bullet shell in his
> desk because he wanted to be sure he had one of the shells there in
> Dallas for future tests (if needed).
This is a violation of ALL evidence handling proceedures. Thus, IF
this case had gone to trial the shell would have been OMITTED and they
would have been stuck with two. See how it all works out? They found
two, they would have to use two. Next?
> Simple as that.
It sure was. I'm glad you admit it was as simple as Capt. Fritz
breaking the law. Thanks for your honesty Dave.
See initially it would be that he messed up the chain of custody for
the "third shell", but it wouldn't be long before the defense raised
the issue of tampering with evidence since the official evidence photo
ONLY shows two bullet shell casings in it.
> To believe in the nutty "Only 2 Shells Were Found" nonsense, Rossley
> The Retard is going to have to call a lot of people liars who said
> there were THREE shells in the Sniper's Nest.
So believing "official" evidence is "nutty" Dave? I'm glad you
FINALLY ADMIT IT! Boy, Dave is really coming clean today for us, huh?
> But I'm sure that accusing a bunch of cops of being rotten, scheming
> liars and evidence-manipulators is just par for the kook course when
> it comes to the beliefs of Rossley. That idiot thinks everybody in
> Texas was out to frame poor Oswald in 1963.
It is NOT a matter of us accusing the cops of anything, there ARE LAWS
AND PROCEDURES ON HOW EVIDENCE IS TO BE COLLECTED, HANDLED, AND
MAINTAINED Dave. It is as simple as that. Fritz, et. al. violated
these laws and procedures on so many occassions you lose count. Ditto
the FBI and SS.
> Plus -- Kook Rossley is going to have believe that there's something
> "fishy" going on with this picture (which he no doubt does think--
> because he's a big idiot):
Nothing fishy about the picture, pictures don't lie, but people do.
Fritz lied. The WC lied. YOU hare lying now.
> http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0...
>
> >>> "Nice try Dave Von Con, but NO cigar for you." <<<
>
> I don't smoke anyway. So you can keep your cigar (or stuff it
> somewhere). Take your pick of cigar options.
Poor Dave, he needs more lessons on how to be a successful con man as
he is so transparent.
CE510 shows 3 shells in the SN, robcap (aka: "Inconceivable Kook").
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0124a.htm
As usual, robcap the idiot has managed to mangle the evidence to suit
his needs. (A real shocker there, huh kids?)
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/radio_debate.htm
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8c41044f-709c-4532...@c36g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
The evidence was turned over to the FBI AFTER midnight.
Taking a minute or two to set up that display, David wants us to believe
that the FBI did NOT know there were 3 shells?????
When addressing CE 510 (Volume XVII page 321) David NEGLECTS to tell you
that that photo was taken on MONDAY ! ! !
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/tom_alyea_film.htm
No Wonder David RAN from a radio debate.
HERE is the FBI Exhibit>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/only_2_shells_found.htm
The SECOND exhibit is from the DPD ! ! ! FOUR (4) Days LATER ! ! !
REPEAT ! NO WONDER DAVID "RAN" FROM A RADIO DEBATE.