JFK Assassination Forum Archives -- Misc. Topics Of Interest (Part 98)

David Von Pein

unread,

May 22, 2009, 2:43:47 AM5/22/09

to

ARCHIVED JFK ASSASSINATION FORUM POSTS OF INTEREST (PART 98):

=====================================================

VINCENT BUGLIOSI AND ROSEMARY NEWTON:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/1ac2630b1293881e

VINCENT BUGLIOSI AND OLIVER STONE:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/9f7c1565be3a8c49

THE LATERAL X-RAY:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/b0f4398ef9c4c84b

A FEW MORE THINGS:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/dd5835f4ee3866e0
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/b736de5991fef17a
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/8509afcd19322cac
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/027c7cc381c021b0

=====================================================

aeffects

unread,

May 22, 2009, 3:48:49 AM5/22/09

to

uh-uh-huhhhhhh no free advertising dipshit!

David Von Pein

unread,

May 22, 2009, 4:29:06 AM5/22/09

to

>>> "I think it's simpler than that, David. The doctors [who examined the autopsy photographs at the National Archives in 1988 for the PBS-TV documentary "Who Shot President Kennedy?"] (none of whom examined the head wound in detail, since they had no reason to do so) had an impression that there was a massive wound in the back of the head. With blood congealing at this area when the President was on his back, it was an absolutely understandable reaction from doctors who were working under great pressure, on their own bloodied President, with no time to study the wounds. When they saw the autopsy photographs, they stated the pictures were basically what they saw in the operating room. Essentially, they were simply conceding they were mistaken about where they believed the wound to be. Highly understandable errors, from very decent doctors." <<<

But I don't understand why the doctors couldn't have been completely
forthright, however, after viewing the photos at the National
Archives.

Let me be clear(er) --- I don't think for a second that the doctors
were part of some "conspiracy", but their comments on the 1988 NOVA
program do not mesh with what they each said about the wounds prior to
seeing the autopsy pictures.

Dr. Pepper Jenkins came the closest to providing a full-fledged "I was
wrong" declaration, when Jenkins conceded that the exit wound was more
to the SIDE of JFK's head, instead of his previously-stated opinion of
the wound being entirely posterior.

And at least two of the doctors did, indeed, say they were mistaken
about seeing "cerebellum" oozing out of President Kennedy's head.

But the doctors could still have been more forthright on the NOVA
program, IMO. And McClelland's explanation about the "scalp pulling"
is just ludicrous. Because, as I mentioned, if that were true, it
would HAVE to mean that JFK's scalp was reflected (peeled) back on his
head in the Parkland ER....and that's nuts, because it wasn't
"reflected" at all.

Anyway, that's my $0.02.

www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/813b15ee4ce35148

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/novadocs.htm

David Von Pein

unread,

May 22, 2009, 4:30:06 AM5/22/09

to

www.imdb.com/title/tt0102138/board/flat/138564504