JFK Assassination Forum Archives -- Misc. Topics Of Interest (Part 201)

[David Von Pein]

ARCHIVED JFK ASSASSINATION FORUM POSTS OF INTEREST (PART 201):

======================================================

PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S LAST SPEECHES:
http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-last-speeches-of-john-f-kennedy.html


COMMISSION EXHIBIT 842:
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,3355.msg230837.html#msg230837
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,3355.msg230951.html#msg230951
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,3355.msg230990.html#msg230990


MEDIA ERRORS:
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=20066&st=30#entry270488


WHY WAS JOHN F. KENNEDY KILLED?:
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,7975.msg231624.html#msg231624
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,7975.msg231635.html#msg231635


THE SINGLE-BULLET THEORY:
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=20059&#entry269934


WOUND LOCATIONS:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/124175ad2f28d5ff
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/e9b80754ee2a874a
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/f8f0fcc7de8d8ada


LINNIE MAE RANDLE:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/efe37288db309c1b


A PRISON SENTENCE FOR LONE-ASSASSIN BELIEVERS?:
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,7980.msg231637.html#msg231637


MARRION BAKER AND ROY TRULY:
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,7986.msg231646.html#msg231646


RALPH YATES:
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=20066&st=30#entry270486
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=20066&st=60#entry270634
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=20066&st=60#entry270642
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=20066&st=60#entry270653


MORE STUFF:
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,7945.msg232300.html#msg232300
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,8050.msg233529.html#msg233529


======================================================

[aeffects]

On Apr 4, 1:21 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:

no advertising troll! You know the rules.

[Bill Clarke]

In article <b92d496d-6afb-409f...@oz4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...

>
>On Apr 4, 1:21=A0pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>no advertising troll! You know the rules.

What about your boy? "How to make money horseshit"

Bill Clarke

[Jason Burke]

I DO like the burning... now what is it... ah, asshole.

[David Von Pein]

RICHARD COLEMAN SAID ALL THIS:

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=20148&#entry272539


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Richard,

1.) OSWALD took OSWALD'S rifle to work on the day of JFK's visit to
Dallas.

2.) OSWALD'S prints were all over the place where the assassin of JFK
was located (the Sniper's Nest on the sixth floor).

3.) OSWALD was identified by a witness as the person who shot Kennedy.

4.) OSWALD shot and killed Officer Tippit.

5.) OSWALD put up a wild fight in the Texas Theater and punched out a
cop while drawing a revolver (the same revolver, of course, that was
used to murder Tippit 35 minutes earlier).

6.) Bullets and bullet shells from OSWALD'S two guns turn up
everywhere where the killer of Kennedy and the killer of Tippit were
known to have been (and in KENNEDY'S CAR even!). And I won't even add
"CE399" to this list, because CTers hate that bullet so much. But, as
can easily be seen, CE399 isn't even really needed to convict OSWALD,
because there's so much other stuff besides 399 that convicts him too.

Yeah, that's some innocent and framed "patsy" you've got there. LOL.

Regarding Point #3:

I know you probably think Howard Brennan is worthless as a witness,
but shouldn't we also consider the description that Mr. Brennan gave
of the assassin in his 11/22 affidavit too? The description in that
affidavit, which was written by Brennan within hours of the
assassination and months before he ever talked to anybody from the
Warren Commission, can, indeed, be considered very "general" in
nature, but it also can fit the person who owned the rifle found on
the sixth floor, especially when combined with Officer Marrion Baker's
description of Oswald. And we KNOW Baker saw OSWALD, not somebody
else, on the second floor.

Just look at these two descriptions in these November 22nd affidavits.
One of these witnesses (Brennan) is describing the sniper on the sixth
floor of the Depository; while the other witness (Baker) is describing
a man he himself personally encountered--a person Baker was just
inches away from in the second-floor lunchroom just 2 minutes or so
after Brennan saw the man he describes in his affidavit. These
descriptions are identical in several key respects, right down to each
witness thinking the man they were describing was about 30 years old.

Here's a direct comparison (and keep in mind that we KNOW Baker IS
describing Lee Harvey Oswald here, not some mystery person whose
identity is still unknown):

BRENNAN -- "White man."
BAKER ---- "White man."

BRENNAN -- "In his early 30s."
BAKER ---- "Approximately 30 years old."

BRENNAN -- "165 to 175 pounds."
BAKER ---- "165 pounds."

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-jTmnYgFvqzM/Tvw3vTpzhsI/AAAAAAAABuI/QJ__Z34iHho/s1200-h/Howard-Brennan-Affidavit.gif

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-4oxRP0t5ZBM/Tvw52B7FIGI/AAAAAAAABwU/QbBHYHhIM4Q/s1200-h/Marrion-Baker-Affidavit.gif

Those identical descriptions are an interesting "coincidence", huh? Do
conspiracy theorists now want to claim that Marrion L. Baker wasn't
really describing Lee Oswald at all in his above affidavit? Or did
Marrion decide to just make up those descriptive details out of whole
cloth in order to conform perfectly with the only witness in all of
Dealey Plaza who actually saw the assassin firing a gun during the
shooting of President Kennedy -- right down to the incorrect age and
weight estimates?