On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 9:29:37 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:29:31 -0700 (PDT), Bud <
sirs...@fast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 9:56:20 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >> >On 1/23/2014 3:32 PM, TJCole wrote:
> >> >> Reading a book at the moment (Lamar Waldron's latest one) and it mentions
> >> >> that several dollar bills that had been cut in half were found in Oswald's
> >> >> possessions.
> >
> > Where does it say this, lurkers?
> >
> > I wouldn`t be surprised if the retards didn`t take the "half
> > dollar" written here to mean a dollar cut in half....
>
> The things that wouldn't surprise you comprise a long list.
When it comes to the ideas of conspiracy retards little surprises me, lurkers. Just when I think one has uttered the stupidest thing I ever heard in my life another comes forward and tops it. If Ben ever grew a pair and put his beliefs on the table it would be a long string of the stupidest shit you ever heard.
> You're not surprised at all that the closest police eyewitness to a
> murder was never questioned by ANYONE for the Warren Commission.
I`m not surprised by Pearl Harbor, either, lurkers. Especially not so long after it happened.
> You're not surprised at all that Lt. Day photographed all prints
> except the one that "proved" the rifle belonged to Oswald.
He explained how this came to pass, lurkers.
> You're not surprised at all that the one photograph that would either
> prove or disprove transit disappeared while under government control.
I haven`t been shown this is true, lurkers.
> I could continue, but my point is made.
>
> >
http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/01/0190-001.gif
>
>
> This is a cite to what he had in his possession at the time of the
> arrest. It has nothing to do with the dollar bills
>
> If you'd done your research, you'd know this.
>
> However....
>
> The topic here has absolutely *NOTHING* to do with whether or not
> Oswald *did* have a dollar cut in half...
Ben shouldn`t have included what that other poster had written, because I decided to address that, lurkers. Every once in a while I have to remind Ben that he isn`t running shit here.
> It has EVERYTHING to do with the lie told by Anthony Marsh, and
> ignored by you...
>
>
>
> >> >> It could be assumed that Oswald would have used the half
> >> >> dollar bill to meet up with a contact who would have the matching half.
> >> >> Also, Oswald had half a carton top on his person when he was arrested in
> >> >> the theatre and a witness inside the theatre reported that he sat next a
> >> >> couple of different people in the cinema as if looking for someone. I am
> >> >> interested in any further information on this (google didn't help much)
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >I seriously doubt it. And that is not always the recognition technique
> >> >used by spies.
> >>
> >> Notice the careful language Tony used, this technique is "not always"
> >> used as a recognition technique.
> >>
> >> In other words, IT ABSOLUTELY **IS** USED AS A RECOGNITION TACTIC, and
> >> Tony knew that to be a fact.
> >>
> >> Interestingly, here's a reference to someone (CIA and Manual Artime)
> >> using this exact technique:
> >>
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=21222&relPageId=2
> >>
> >> It's for posts like this that Tony left the public forums years ago
> >> and now only posts in censored forums where he can be protected from
> >> his misleading lies being pointed out.
>
> Anyone notice that "Dud" refused to say anything at all about Tony's
> dishonest and misleading post?
I didn`t find that very interesting, lurkers. The interesting thing to me is that these are the retard trading cards conspiracy retards have been trading with each other for decades, tales of Oswald the Spy and his cut half dollar recognition signal. Intrigue! Danger! Retardation!