"How The DA Acquitted Everyone But Oswald"
David Von Pein
http://EducationForum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=16741&st=15&p=208365&#entry208365
SUPER-KOOK JIM DiEUGENIO SAID:
>>> "Part Ten of my RH installment...is: "How the DA Acquitted Everyone But Oswald"." <<<
DVP SAID:
Oh, brother, what a goofy and idiotic title that is.
Of course Bugliosi "acquitted everyone but Oswald", and he should have
done so.
Why?
Because everyone was innocent except Oswald.
(Duh.)
I think Vince B. should have probably had a similar chapter in the
second half of "Reclaiming History", entitled "How The Conspiracy
Kooks Have Convicted Everyone Under The Sun EXCEPT Oswald".
I wonder if Part 11 of DiEugenio's never-ending series of VB-bashing
tripe is going to be:
"Bugliosi's A Boob For Not Throwing Out All Of The Evidence Against
Oswald, Which Is What I (James DiEugenio) Have Done In The JFK And
Tippit Murder Cases"
This nut named DiEugenio seems to get a little bit kookier every day.
http://groups.google.com/group/reclaiming-history/browse_thread/thread/863ee417ecb1633f
David Von Pein
http://EducationForum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=16741&st=15&p=208377&#entry208377
http://EducationForum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=16741&st=15&p=208381&#entry208381
DELUSIONAL DiEUGENIO SAID:
One of the parts of RH that DVP and his cohorts praised was in Book
Two when VB went through the suspects people have brought up in this
case. He brings them up even if today, no one or almost no one thinks
they killed JFK. For example: the KGB, Castro, Radical Right etc.
Bugliosi does this because he takes each group in isolation. He
ignores the fact that there were definite ties between those groups
considered the chief suspects: CIA, the Mob, and Cuban exiles. And its
this avoidance technique, which DVP never brings up, that I am going
to demonstrate as hollow.
And if no one else was guilty, why did the following happen:
1. David Ferrie searching for any pictures of he and Oswald on
November 23rd.
2. Clay Shaw calling Dean Andrews to defend Oswald.
3. James Angleton bifurcating the Oswald file at CIA HQ until November
22nd.
4. The military stopping the pathologists from doing a proper autopsy
at Bethesda
5. Ruby knowing which door to enter at the Dallas Police HQ in order
to kill Oswald.
6. The CIA telling the DFS to arrest Sylvia Duran since she was
describing a man as Oswald who clearly was not.
7. Anne Goodpasture sending a photo to Langley and the WC of a man who
clearly was not Oswald
8. Goodpasture sending a tape to Dallas supposedly of Oswald which was
not.
9. Why did the Paines say that Oswald was not responsible for the
murder
10. Why did the FBI switch the bullet forwarded from Parkland
These things happened since Oswald had nothing to do with killing
Kennedy. A fact you have decided to spend your life covering up,
concealing and deceiving the public about. SInce, as you say yourself,
you have no life. I guess it gets boring serving chicken and you don't
travel very much like your brother does.
As per Part 11, this will explore Bugliosi's relationship with David
Phillips, his apparent consultations with him on the eve of the phony
London trial, and how Tom Hanks is a perfect match for RH in the New
Hollywood.
You'll like it Davey. SInce you are such a lousy and psychologically
blinkered investigator you never found out about any of this.
==============================================
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Who cares? Spout all the conspiracy nonsense you want, Jimbo. I
wouldn't believe a thing Jim DiEugenio ever said anyway. No reasonable
person could possibly even begin to believe all of the stupid things
Jim DiEugenio believes when it comes to his ludicrously elaborate and
impossible conspiracy theories re JFK's death. You're only good for
laughs, Jimmy.
BTW, for those lurkers who might be unaware, Delusional DiEugenio is
the same conspiracy-hungry monger who thinks Buell Wesley Frazier and
Linnie Mae Randle were liars and just made up out of whole cloth the
story about Oswald carrying a large brown bag on the morning of
November 22, 1963. (The evil DPD "forced" them to make up the paper
bag, per Jimbo. How's that for ludicrously elaborate?)
"Blinkered", indeed. Jimmy D. is so bent on having a JFK conspiracy
that he can't even see that his latest list of 10 items in his last
post is totally laughable from beginning to end. Numbers 2, 9, and 10
are particularly hilarious. And Jimbo has surely got to know that
those things are hilarious. But that won't stop him from spouting such
crap, 24/7.
Pathetic, as usual.
aeffects
> http://EducationForum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=16741&st=15&p=2...
<snip the lone nut trolls lunacy and anxiety>
Jimmy D. simply kicks your ass every, E-V-E-R-Y time you confront
him.... sigh. Are you into self-abuse, hon? Carry on! ROTFLMFAO!
aeffects
...
> Pathetic, as usual.
Indeed you are, troll -- INDEED YOU ARE!