FOR JGL
tomnln
<JLeyd...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:15d75e48-739c-425b...@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 16, 12:47?am, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
The HSCA found that Oswald killed JFK, wounded Connally and later killed
Tippit. Nobody else laid a glove (or a bullet) on any of the three. We
all know the story about the phantom on the Grassy Knoll and the highly
disputed acoustic evidence that Blakey used to put him there but the
alleged shooter was such a dud that he not only missed JFK but everything
else in Dealey Plaza as well. And remember this was at a distance that
any respectable Little league pitcher could have delivered a presidential
bean ball with relative ease. But, of course, these theories are what keep
guys like you in business.
JGL
JGL is NOT familiar with hia own report.
Testimony in volume III pages 446-447 shows that THREE (3) NRA Masters
(Staley, Hendricks & Miller could NOT
accomplish what the Warren Commission attributed to Oswald. (A LOUSY shot)
ps;
An NRA Master is qualified to compete in Olympic Competition.
> JLeyden...@aol.com wrote:
> > On Aug 14, 11:50 am, thaliac...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> >> Sarcastic comments do not make up for the fact that Bugliosi (the
> >> saviour of the Lone Nut cause according to some) has been caught out.
> >> BTW, Oz is doing extremely well in the Olympics seeing our population
> >> is a measley 21 mil.-
>
> > The arguiment that Oswald was the lone assassin isn't grounded in the
> > works of Bugliosi or even Gerald Posner but in the reports of the
> > Warren Commission and the HSCA along with less comprehsenive official
>
> More misrepresentation. The HSCA said that Oswald was NOT a lone
> assassin. They said it was a conspiracy. And they specified two
> shooters. Some on the committee pretended that maybe it was just an
> amazing coincidence that two lone nut shooters just happened to pick the
> same time and place to kill Kennedy. Would you fall for that fairytale?
>
> > inquiries such as the Rockefeller Commission and the Clark panel.
> > Conspiracy advocates, of course, have nothing comparable and are
> > forced to rely on the faulty research and highly questionable opinions
> > of the Mark Lanes, Jim Marrs and the Oliver Stones of the world along
> > with endless nitpicking of the official documents. Not much of a
>
> We have the HSCA and the ARRB, the most recent official conclusions.
>
>
>
> > contest, really. ?(Oh, glad to see Australia is doing well in the
> > Olympics; hopefully none of your or our athletes will perish from smog
> > inhalation.)
>
> > JGL
>
> >> On Aug 14, 11:34 am, "Grizzlie Antagonist" <lloydsofhanf...@yahoo.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> <JLeyden...@aol.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:28730259-d21f-4c93...@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> >>> On Aug 13, 12:18?am, "Grizzlie Antagonist" <lloydsofhanf...@yahoo.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> <thaliac...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:b745cf25-00ab-4e85...@a8g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>> I also recently read Bugliosi's book on prosecuting George W Bush
> >>>>> for
> >>>>> murder, and I generally agreed with his premise, though he tends
> >>>>> towards sweeping statements, and is vague with some facts. However,
> >>>>> I
> >>>>> am perplexed that he can see no link betweek the power block that
> >>>>> got
> >>>>> rid of JFK and the power block that got Bush the whitehouse and the
> >>>>> US
> >>>>> invading Iraq.
> >>>> He should have spent more time in the outback. It's a great place to
> >>>> learn about the Washington power structure.
> >>>> Good point, Griz. How do these guys get to be such experts on the USA
> >>>> anyway? I'm not even sure where Australia is -- down there near New
> >>>> Guinea someplace.
> >>>> JGL
> >>> They go to journalism school. Everything about the subject is covered
> >>> in
> >>> the first semester.- Hide quoted text -
> >>> - Show quoted text -
> >> Sarcastic comments do not make up for the fact that Bugliosi (the
> >> saviour of the Lone Nut cause according to some) has been caught out.
> >> BTW, Oz is doing extremely well in the Olympics seeing our population
> >> is a measley 21 mil.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Say, if Oswald was a *LOUSY* shot, as you claim, why did he attain the
rank of sharpshooter when he was in the Marines?
Curious Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Aug 17, 1:22 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> In case McAdams don't post this one.
>
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f32f71f4-aec1-4707...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Hi tomnln,
Say, if Oswald was a *LOUSY* shot, as you claim, why did he attain the
rank of sharpshooter when he was in the Marines?
Curious Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
Do I Really have to educate you on the testimony of Sgt. Nelson Delgado
Timmy?
See Volume VIII pages 236-239."Oswald was Lousy Shot
Unless you think it was the time frame that you believe Oswald was....
5 ft. 3 inches tall
Blond Haired
119 pounds.
No wonder you RUN from the authorities Tampering with Evidence>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/Evid%20Tamp.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
RUN Timmy RUN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
aeffects
> TOP POST
>
> Hi tomnln,
>
> Say, if Oswald was a *LOUSY* shot, as you claim, why did he attain the
> rank of sharpshooter when he was in the Marines?
sitdown timmy.... ya need to take your dumber than dumb LHO rifle
qualification questions to JFKLancer and present them to Sgt. Mikey...
Best regard's Samantha (phew.... smells like tuna in this thread
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Say, is THIS your denial that Oswald shot a 212 on the rifle range and
qualified as a Sharpshooter?
BTW, tomnln, Delgado told Bugliosi, under oath, in *On Trial: LHO*
that Oswald wasn't really trying on the rifle range when Delgado knew
him.
You did know that, didn't you tomnln?
No, I didn't think so.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Aug 17, 2:01 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:f32f71f4-aec1-4707...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
> TOP POST
>
> Hi tomnln,
>
> Say, if Oswald was a *LOUSY* shot, as you claim, why did he attain the
> rank of sharpshooter when he was in the Marines?
>
> Curious Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> Do I Really have to educate you on the testimony of Sgt. Nelson Delgado
> Timmy?
>
> See Volume VIII pages 236-239."Oswald was Lousy Shot
>
> Unless you think it was the time frame that you believe Oswald was....
> 5 ft. 3 inches tall
> Blond Haired
> 119 pounds.
>
> No wonder you RUN from the authorities Tampering with Evidence>>>
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/Evid%20Tamp.htmhttp://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
>
> RUN Timmy RUN
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JLeyd...@aol.com
> Testimony in volume III pages 446-447 shows that THREE (3) NRA Masters
> (Staley, Hendricks & Miller could NOT
> accomplish what the Warren Commission attributed to Oswald. (A LOUSY shot)
>
> ps;
>
> An NRA Master is qualified to compete in Olympic Competition.
> In case McAdams don't post this one.
Some times I wonder if JFK didn't just expire from natural causes (he
had health problems, you know) and his family, friends and admirers
staged this whole assassination thing to assure him a higher place in
history. Every time someone says Oswald did it, we're told he
couldn't have because he couldn't hit the broad side of a barn, his
rifle was a piece of junk and his ammo was bad. Now Tom, citing
evidence/testimony, points out that even NRA Masters couldn't have
made the shots. Obviously, then, no one shot him. I'm going back to
that natural causes/put-up job argument.
JGL
Ben Holmes
JLeyd...@aol.com says...
>
>On Aug 16, 11:22=EF=BF=BDpm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> Testimony in volume III pages 446-447 shows that THREE (3) NRA Masters
>> (Staley, Hendricks & Miller could NOT
>)
>>
>> ps;
>>
>> An NRA Master is qualified to compete in Olympic Competition.
>> In case McAdams don't post this one.
>
>Some times I wonder if JFK didn't just expire from natural causes (he
>had health problems, you know) and his family, friends and admirers
>staged this whole assassination thing to assure him a higher place in
>history. Every time someone says Oswald did it, we're told he
>couldn't have because he couldn't hit the broad side of a barn, his
>rifle was a piece of junk and his ammo was bad. Now Tom, citing
>evidence/testimony, points out that even NRA Masters couldn't have
>made the shots. Obviously, then, no one shot him. I'm going back to
>that natural causes/put-up job argument.
>
>JGL
Just about the stupidest logic ever proffered on this forum...
>> <JLeyden...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:15d75e48-739c-425b...@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
>> On Aug 16, 12:47?am, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> The HSCA found that Oswald killed JFK, wounded Connally and later killed
>> Tippit. =EF=BF=BDNobody else laid a glove (or a bullet) on any of the thr=
>ee. =EF=BF=BDWe
>> all know the story about the phantom on the Grassy Knoll and the highly
>> disputed acoustic evidence that Blakey used to put him there but the
>> alleged shooter was such a dud that he not only missed JFK but everything
>> else in Dealey Plaza as well. =EF=BF=BDAnd remember this was at a distanc=
>e that
>> any respectable Little league pitcher could have delivered a presidential
>> bean ball with relative ease. But, of course, these theories are what kee=
>p
>> guys like you in business.
>>
>> JGL
>>
>> JGL is NOT familiar with hia own report.
>>
>> Testimony in volume III pages 446-447 shows that THREE (3) NRA Masters
>> (Staley, Hendricks & Miller could NOT
>> accomplish what the Warren Commission attributed to Oswald. (A LOUSY shot=
>)
>>
>> ps;
>>
>> An NRA Master is qualified to compete in Olympic Competition.
>>
>>
>>
>> > JLeyden...@aol.com wrote:
>> > > On Aug 14, 11:50 am, thaliac...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>> > >> Sarcastic comments do not make up for the fact that Bugliosi (the
>> > >> saviour of the Lone Nut cause according to some) has been caught out=
>.
>> > >> BTW, Oz is doing extremely well in the Olympics seeing our populatio=
>n
>> > >> is a measley 21 mil.-
>>
>> > > The arguiment that Oswald was the lone assassin isn't grounded in the
>> > > works of Bugliosi or even Gerald Posner but in the reports of the
>> > > Warren Commission and the HSCA along with less comprehsenive official
>>
>> > More misrepresentation. The HSCA said that Oswald was NOT a lone
>> > assassin. They said it was a conspiracy. And they specified two
>> > shooters. Some on the committee pretended that maybe it was just an
>> > amazing coincidence that two lone nut shooters just happened to pick th=
>e
>> > same time and place to kill Kennedy. Would you fall for that fairytale?
>>
>> > > inquiries such as the Rockefeller Commission and the Clark panel.
>> > > Conspiracy advocates, of course, have nothing comparable and are
>> > > forced to rely on the faulty research and highly questionable opinion=
>s
>> > > of the Mark Lanes, Jim Marrs and the Oliver Stones of the world along
>> > > with endless nitpicking of the official documents. Not much of a
>>
>> > We have the HSCA and the ARRB, the most recent official conclusions.
>>
>> > > contest, really. ?(Oh, glad to see Australia is doing well in the
>> > > Olympics; hopefully none of your or our athletes will perish from smo=
>g
>> > > inhalation.)
>>
>> > > JGL
>>
>> > >> On Aug 14, 11:34 am, "Grizzlie Antagonist" <lloydsofhanf...@yahoo.co=
>m>
>> > >> wrote:
>>
>> > >>> <JLeyden...@aol.com> wrote in message
>> > >>>news:28730259-d21f-4c93...@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.co=
>m...
>> > >>> On Aug 13, 12:18?am, "Grizzlie Antagonist" <lloydsofhanf...@yahoo.c=
>om>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>> <thaliac...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> > >>>>news:b745cf25-00ab-4e85...@a8g2000prf.googlegroups.c=
>om...
>> > >>>>> I also recently read Bugliosi's book on prosecuting George W Bush
>> > >>>>> for
>> > >>>>> murder, and I generally agreed with his premise, though he tends
>> > >>>>> towards sweeping statements, and is vague with some facts. Howeve=
>r,
>> > >>>>> I
>> > >>>>> am perplexed that he can see no link betweek the power block that
>> > >>>>> got
>> > >>>>> rid of JFK and the power block that got Bush the whitehouse and t=
>he
>> > >>>>> US
>> > >>>>> invading Iraq.
>> > >>>> He should have spent more time in the outback. It's a great place =
>to
>> > >>>> learn about the Washington power structure.
>> > >>>> Good point, Griz. How do these guys get to be such experts on the =
>USA
>> > >>>> anyway? I'm not even sure where Australia is -- down there near Ne=
>w
>> > >>>> Guinea someplace.
>> > >>>> JGL
>> > >>> They go to journalism school. Everything about the subject is cover=
>ed
>> > >>> in
>> > >>> the first semester.- Hide quoted text -
>> > >>> - Show quoted text -
>> > >> Sarcastic comments do not make up for the fact that Bugliosi (the
>> > >> saviour of the Lone Nut cause according to some) has been caught out=
>.
>> > >> BTW, Oz is doing extremely well in the Olympics seeing our populatio=
Harry
JFK committed suicide. Idiot troll!
JLeyd...@aol.com
> Just about the stupidest logic ever proffered on this forum...
>
>Ah come on, Ben, I've seen the posts in this forum, yours included, actually yours especially. Mine isn't even close to the ACJ "stupidest" standard, yours especially.
JGL
> In article <882e63ab-138d-4cd0-a2e1-573364682...@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
> JLeyden...@aol.com says...
Ben Holmes
JLeyd...@aol.com says...
>
>On Aug 17, 1:13=EF=BF=BDpm, Ben Holmes <ad...@khadaji.com> wrote:
>
>> Just about the stupidest logic ever proffered on this forum...
>>
>>Ah come on, Ben, I've seen the posts in this forum, yours included, actually
>>yours especially. Mine isn't even close to the ACJ "stupidest" standard,
>>yours especially.
>
>JGL
Willing to defend your silly logic? Let me know, and I'll poke holes in it
large enough for even the trolls to look through.
>> In article <882e63ab-138d-4cd0-a2e1-573364682...@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups=
>.com>,
>> JLeyden...@aol.com says...
>>
>> >On Aug 16, 11:22=3DEF=3DBF=3DBDpm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> >> Testimony in volume III pages 446-447 shows that THREE (3) NRA Masters
>> >> (Staley, Hendricks & Miller could NOT
>> >> accomplish what the Warren Commission attributed to Oswald. (A LOUSY s=
>hot=3D
>> >)
>>
>> >> ps;
>>
>> >> An NRA Master is qualified to compete in Olympic Competition.
>> >> In case McAdams don't post this one.
>>
>> >Some times I wonder if JFK didn't just expire from natural causes (he
>> >had health problems, you know) and his family, friends and admirers
>> >staged this whole assassination thing to assure him a higher place in
>> >history. =EF=BF=BDEvery time someone says Oswald did it, we're told he
>> >couldn't have because he couldn't hit the broad side of a barn, his
>> >rifle was a piece of junk and his ammo was bad. =EF=BF=BDNow Tom, citing
>> >evidence/testimony, points out that even NRA Masters couldn't have
>> >made the shots. =EF=BF=BDObviously, then, no one shot him. =EF=BF=BDI'm =
>going back to
>> >that natural causes/put-up job argument.
>>
>> >JGL
>>
>> Just about the stupidest logic ever proffered on this forum...
>>
>>
>>
>> >> <JLeyden...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:15d75e48-739c-425b...@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com.=
>..
>> >> On Aug 16, 12:47?am, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> >> The HSCA found that Oswald killed JFK, wounded Connally and later kill=
>ed
>> >> Tippit. =3DEF=3DBF=3DBDNobody else laid a glove (or a bullet) on any o=
>f the thr=3D
>> >ee. =3DEF=3DBF=3DBDWe
>> >> all know the story about the phantom on the Grassy Knoll and the highl=
>y
>> >> disputed acoustic evidence that Blakey used to put him there but the
>> >> alleged shooter was such a dud that he not only missed JFK but everyth=
>ing
>> >> else in Dealey Plaza as well. =3DEF=3DBF=3DBDAnd remember this was at =
>a distanc=3D
>> >e that
>> >> any respectable Little league pitcher could have delivered a president=
>ial
>> >> bean ball with relative ease. But, of course, these theories are what =
>kee=3D
>> >p
>> >> guys like you in business.
>>
>> >> JGL
>>
>> >> JGL is NOT familiar with hia own report.
>>
>> >> Testimony in volume III pages 446-447 shows that THREE (3) NRA Masters
>> >> (Staley, Hendricks & Miller could NOT
>> >> accomplish what the Warren Commission attributed to Oswald. (A LOUSY s=
>hot=3D
>> >)
>>
>> >> ps;
>>
>> >> An NRA Master is qualified to compete in Olympic Competition.
>>
>> >> > JLeyden...@aol.com wrote:
>> >> > > On Aug 14, 11:50 am, thaliac...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >> > >> Sarcastic comments do not make up for the fact that Bugliosi (the
>> >> > >> saviour of the Lone Nut cause according to some) has been caught =
>out=3D
>> >.
>> >> > >> BTW, Oz is doing extremely well in the Olympics seeing our popula=
>tio=3D
>> >n
>> >> > >> is a measley 21 mil.-
>>
>> >> > > The arguiment that Oswald was the lone assassin isn't grounded in =
>the
>> >> > > works of Bugliosi or even Gerald Posner but in the reports of the
>> >> > > Warren Commission and the HSCA along with less comprehsenive offic=
>ial
>>
>> >> > More misrepresentation. The HSCA said that Oswald was NOT a lone
>> >> > assassin. They said it was a conspiracy. And they specified two
>> >> > shooters. Some on the committee pretended that maybe it was just an
>> >> > amazing coincidence that two lone nut shooters just happened to pick=
> th=3D
>> >e
>> >> > same time and place to kill Kennedy. Would you fall for that fairyta=
>le?
>>
>> >> > > inquiries such as the Rockefeller Commission and the Clark panel.
>> >> > > Conspiracy advocates, of course, have nothing comparable and are
>> >> > > forced to rely on the faulty research and highly questionable opin=
>ion=3D
>> >s
>> >> > > of the Mark Lanes, Jim Marrs and the Oliver Stones of the world al=
>ong
>> >> > > with endless nitpicking of the official documents. Not much of a
>>
>> >> > We have the HSCA and the ARRB, the most recent official conclusions.
>>
>> >> > > contest, really. ?(Oh, glad to see Australia is doing well in the
>> >> > > Olympics; hopefully none of your or our athletes will perish from =
>smo=3D
>> >g
>> >> > > inhalation.)
>>
>> >> > > JGL
>>
>> >> > >> On Aug 14, 11:34 am, "Grizzlie Antagonist" <lloydsofhanf...@yahoo=
>.co=3D
>> >m>
>> >> > >> wrote:
>>
>> >> > >>> <JLeyden...@aol.com> wrote in message
>> >> > >>>news:28730259-d21f-4c93...@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups=
>.co=3D
>> >m...
>> >> > >>> On Aug 13, 12:18?am, "Grizzlie Antagonist" <lloydsofhanf...@yaho=
>o.c=3D
>> >om>
>> >> > >>> wrote:
>> >> > >>>> <thaliac...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> > >>>>news:b745cf25-00ab-4e85...@a8g2000prf.googlegroup=
>s.c=3D
>> >om...
>> >> > >>>>> I also recently read Bugliosi's book on prosecuting George W B=
>ush
>> >> > >>>>> for
>> >> > >>>>> murder, and I generally agreed with his premise, though he ten=
>ds
>> >> > >>>>> towards sweeping statements, and is vague with some facts. How=
>eve=3D
>> >r,
>> >> > >>>>> I
>> >> > >>>>> am perplexed that he can see no link betweek the power block t=
>hat
>> >> > >>>>> got
>> >> > >>>>> rid of JFK and the power block that got Bush the whitehouse an=
>d t=3D
>> >he
>> >> > >>>>> US
>> >> > >>>>> invading Iraq.
>> >> > >>>> He should have spent more time in the outback. It's a great pla=
>ce =3D
>> >to
>> >> > >>>> learn about the Washington power structure.
>> >> > >>>> Good point, Griz. How do these guys get to be such experts on t=
>he =3D
>> >USA
>> >> > >>>> anyway? I'm not even sure where Australia is -- down there near=
> Ne=3D
>> >w
>> >> > >>>> Guinea someplace.
>> >> > >>>> JGL
>> >> > >>> They go to journalism school. Everything about the subject is co=
>ver=3D
>> >ed
>> >> > >>> in
>> >> > >>> the first semester.- Hide quoted text -
>> >> > >>> - Show quoted text -
>> >> > >> Sarcastic comments do not make up for the fact that Bugliosi (the
>> >> > >> saviour of the Lone Nut cause according to some) has been caught =
>out=3D
>> >.
>> >> > >> BTW, Oz is doing extremely well in the Olympics seeing our popula=
>tio=3D
JLeyd...@aol.com
>Willing to defend your silly logic? Let me know, and I'll poke holes in >it large enough for even the trolls to look through.
Ah, no you don't, Ben. I'm planning to copyright my scenario and
you're not going to horn in on it. Do your own things with that 45
questions or answers or whatever. Might make a TV series. There's
been a big hole in the TV schedules since "Laugh In" folded.
JGL
- Hide quoted text -
> In article <42564fe5-a9f7-4232-8cff-e11ad7a8b...@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects
> In article <42564fe5-a9f7-4232-8cff-e11ad7a8b...@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
> JLeyden...@aol.com says...
>
>
>
> >On Aug 17, 1:13=EF=BF=BDpm, Ben Holmes <ad...@khadaji.com> wrote:
>
> >> Just about the stupidest logic ever proffered on this forum...
>
> >>Ah come on, Ben, I've seen the posts in this forum, yours included, actually
> >>yours especially. Mine isn't even close to the ACJ "stupidest" standard,
> >>yours especially.
>
> >JGL
>
> Willing to defend your silly logic? Let me know, and I'll poke holes in it
> large enough for even the trolls to look through.
my goodness the aaj .john whiners showed up for this one, LMAO!
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Say, there was no need for you to go and open another thread on this
particular matter, tomnln.
There was just a need for you, tomnln, to answer a simple question:
Did Oswald shoot a 212 on the rifle range when he was a US Marine,
which qualified him for the rank of Sharpshooter?
That's all tomnln. Just answer the question, please. No need to veer
off on some ridiculous tangent about *the destruction of evidence* or
another repeat of your entirely fictitious 5' 3" Oswald in Mexico
City, tomnln.
Do you fear the question, tomnln?
Perhaps you FEAR it.
Is that the case, tomnln?
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Aug 17, 2:01 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:f32f71f4-aec1-4707...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
> TOP POST
>
> Hi tomnln,
>
> Say, if Oswald was a *LOUSY* shot, as you claim, why did he attain the
> rank of sharpshooter when he was in the Marines?
>
> Curious Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> Do I Really have to educate you on the testimony of Sgt. Nelson Delgado
> Timmy?
>
> See Volume VIII pages 236-239."Oswald was Lousy Shot
>
> Unless you think it was the time frame that you believe Oswald was....
> 5 ft. 3 inches tall
> Blond Haired
> 119 pounds.
>
> No wonder you RUN from the authorities Tampering with Evidence>>>
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/Evid%20Tamp.htmhttp://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
>
> RUN Timmy RUN
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ecfc45f-2c2b-44e6...@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Hi tomnln,
Say, there was no need for you to go and open another thread on this
particular matter, tomnln.
There was just a need for you, tomnln, to answer a simple question:
Did Oswald shoot a 212 on the rifle range when he was a US Marine,
which qualified him for the rank of Sharpshooter?
That's all tomnln. Just answer the question, please. No need to veer
off on some ridiculous tangent about *the destruction of evidence* or
another repeat of your entirely fictitious 5' 3" Oswald in Mexico
City, tomnln.
Do you fear the question, tomnln?
Perhaps you FEAR it.
Is that the case, tomnln?
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
Nobody knows Timmy.
Considering the testimony of Oswald's Sgt.
Sgt. Nelson Delgado said Oswald was a Lousy shot.
Delgado also said sometimes a Marine's rifle score was "Altered" to make the
platoon look good.
I believe Lt. John Donovan said basically the samr thing.
And, you're STUCK with that official testimony.
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
I thought Donovan told the Secret Service he was unable to comment on
Oswald's ability on the rifle range?
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >http://whokilledjfk.net/Evid%20Tamp.htmhttp://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN...
>
> > RUN Timmy RUN
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Say, when I asked you whether Oswald shot a 212 on the rifle range,
qualifying him as a sharpshooter, you replied, in this very thread,
that: *Nobody knows Timmy.*
Isn't that right, tomnln?
How then do you explain this from the evidence/testimony, tomnln?:
http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh19/pages/WH_Vol19_0017b.jpg
Sure looks like this guy, Folsom, knew back in the sixties that Oswald
fired a 212, tomnln.
That's evidence/testimony, tomnln. From the 26 volumes. To whit, 19 H
16, tomnln.
Why did you go against the evidence/testimony, tomnln?
Don't you like the evidence/testimony anymore?
Oh dear...
Surprised Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >http://whokilledjfk.net/Evid%20Tamp.htmhttp://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN...
>
> > RUN Timmy RUN
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tims...@gmail.com
On Aug 24, 6:02 pm, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
> TOP POST
>
> Hi tomnln,
>
> Say, when I asked you whether Oswald shot a 212 on the rifle range,
> qualifying him as a sharpshooter, you replied, in this very thread,
> that: *Nobody knows Timmy.*
>
> Isn't that right, tomnln?
>
> How then do you explain this from the evidence/testimony, tomnln?:
>
> http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh19/pages/WH_Vol19_0...
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > > On Aug 17, 1:22 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > > > In case McAdams don't post this one.
>
> > > > <JLeyden...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> > > >news:15d75e48-739c-425b...@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
> > > > On Aug 16, 12:47?am, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > > The HSCA found that Oswald killed JFK, wounded Connally and later killed
> > > > Tippit. Nobody else laid a glove (or a bullet) on any of the three. We
> > > > all know the story about the phantom on the Grassy Knoll and the highly
> > > > disputed acoustic evidence that Blakey used to put him there but the
> > > > alleged shooter was such a dud that he not only missed JFK but
> > > > everything
> > > > else in Dealey Plaza as well. And remember this was at a distance that
> > > > any respectable Little league pitcher could have delivered a
> > > > presidential
> > > > bean ball with relative ease. But, of course, these theories are what
> > > > keep
> > > > guys like you in business.
>
> > > >JGL
>
> > > >JGLis NOT familiar with hia own report.
tims...@gmail.com
that the Zapruder film was altered. What do you think?Say, speaking of
stupid theories, didn't you once posit that the presence of a lady in
yellow pants in the Nix film proved that the Zapruder film had been
altered.Still, in fairness, even you no longer seem inclined to defend
such an absurd theory, LOL!Regards,Tim BrennanSydney,
Australia*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*On Aug 18, 3:13 am, Ben Holmes
<ad...@khadaji.com> wrote:> In article <882e63ab-138d-4cd0-
a2e1-573364682...@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,> JLeyden...@aol.com
tims...@gmail.com
tomnln,> > Say, when I asked you whether Oswald shot a 212 on the
rifle range,> qualifying him as a sharpshooter, you replied, in this
very thread,> that: *Nobody knows Timmy.*> > Isn't that right, tomnln?
> > How then do you explain this from the evidence/testimony,
ae81-d38...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...> > > TOP POST> > > >
Hi tomnln,> > > > Say, if Oswald was a *LOUSY* shot, as you claim, why
did he attain the> > > rank of sharpshooter when he was in the Marines?
> > > > Curious Regards,> > > > Tim Brennan> > > Sydney, Australia> >
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*> > > > Do I Really have to educate you on
the testimony of Sgt. Nelson Delgado> > > Timmy?> > > > See Volume
VIII pages 236-239."Oswald was Lousy Shot> > > > Unless you think it
was the time frame that you believe Oswald was....> > > 5 ft. 3 inches
tall> > > Blond Haired> > > 119 pounds.> > > > No wonder you RUN from
the authorities Tampering with Evidence>>>> > > >http://
whokilledjfk.net/Evid%20Tamp.htmhttp://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN...> > >
> RUN Timmy RUN> > >
tomnln
Apparently you MISSED the testimony that on occasion a marine's rifle score
was "ALTERED".
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1f676411-be4c-4c31...@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5d380b75-0072-4248...@p10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Hi tomnln,
I thought Donovan told the Secret Service he was unable to comment on
Oswald's ability on the rifle range?
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TWO (2) people who KNEW Oswald said Oswald was a lousy shot Timmy.
Sgt. Delgado
Col. Folsom
HOW well did YOU know Oswald Timmy???
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------нн--------------------------------------------------------------------------н-н---
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ad781aad-f236-4cb8...@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Hi tomnln,
Say, when I asked you whether Oswald shot a 212 on the rifle range,
qualifying him as a sharpshooter, you replied, in this very thread,
that: *Nobody knows Timmy.*
Isn't that right, tomnln?
How then do you explain this from the evidence/testimony, tomnln?:
http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh19/pages/WH_Vol19_0017b.jpg
Sure looks like this guy, Folsom, knew back in the sixties that Oswald
fired a 212, tomnln.
That's evidence/testimony, tomnln. From the 26 volumes. To whit, 19 H
16, tomnln.
Why did you go against the evidence/testimony, tomnln?
Don't you like the evidence/testimony anymore?
Oh dear...
Surprised Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Timmy;
Are you talking about the same Col. Folsom who described Oswald's rifle
ability as "A Rather POOR Shot"?
Don't forget these Timmy>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/Evid%20Tamp.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
You've been RUNNING from them for over a YEAR! ! !
You don't condone "Evidence Tampering" do you Timmy?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------нн--------------------------------------------------------------------------н-н---
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Say, don't you want to discuss Donovan anymore? We both know HE
doesn't support your argument, don't we tomnln.
BTW, I wasn't aware that Folsom knew Oswald. I thought he was some guy
called as an expert witness after the assassination to comment on
Oswald's shooting record.
What's your proof that he KNEW Oswald, tomnln?
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
aeffects
> TOP POSTOh I don't know, Ben. I think probably the stupidest theory is
> that the Zapruder film was altered. What do you think?Say, speaking of
> stupid theories, didn't you once posit that the presence of a lady in
> yellow pants in the Nix film proved that the Zapruder film had been
> altered.Still, in fairness, even you no longer seem inclined to defend
> such an absurd theory, LOL!Regards,Tim BrennanSydney,
> Australia*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*On Aug 18, 3:13 am, Ben Holmes<ad...@khadaji.com> wrote:> In article <882e63ab-138d-4cd0-
>
> a2e1-573364682...@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,> JLeyden...@aol.com
> says...> > > > > > > > >On Aug 16, 11:22=EF=BF=BDpm, "tomnln"<tom...@cox.net> wrote:> > >> Testimony in volume III pages 446-447
>
> shows that THREE (3) NRA Masters> >> (Staley, Hendricks & Miller could
> NOT> >> accomplish what the Warren Commission attributed to Oswald. (A
> LOUSY shot=> >)> > >> ps;> > >> An NRA Master is qualified to compete
> in Olympic Competition.> >> In case McAdams don't post this one.> >>Some times I wonder if JFK didn't just expire from natural causes
>
> (he> >had health problems, you know) and his family, friends and
> admirers> >staged this whole assassination thing to assure him a
> higher place in> >history. Every time someone says Oswald did it,
> we're told he> >couldn't have because he couldn't hit the broad side
> of a barn, his> >rifle was a piece of junk and his ammo was bad. Now
> Tom, citing> >evidence/testimony, points out that even NRA Masters
> couldn't have> >made the shots. Obviously, then, no one shot him.
> I'm going back to> >that natural causes/put-up job argument.> > >JGL>> Just about the stupidest logic ever proffered on this forum...> > >
> > >> <JLeyden...@aol.com> wrote in message> > >>news:
>
>
> <lloydsofhanf...@yahoo.c=> >om>> >> > >>> wrote:> >> > >>>><thaliac...@hotmail.com> wrote in message> >> >
> >>>>news:b745cf25-00ab-4e85...@a8g2000prf.googlegroups.c=>
> >om...> >> > >>>>> I also recently read Bugliosi's book on prosecuting
>
> George W Bush> >> > >>>>> for> >> > >>>>> murder, and I generally
> agreed with his premise, though he tends> >> > >>>>> towards sweeping
> statements, and is vague with some facts. Howeve=> >r,> >> > >>>>> I>>> > >>>>> am perplexed that he can see no link betweek the power
>
> block that> >> > >>>>> got> >> > >>>>> rid of JFK and the power block
> that got Bush the whitehouse and t=> >he> >> > >>>>> US> >> > >>>>>
> invading Iraq.> >> > >>>> He should have spent more time in the
> outback. It's a great place => >to> >> > >>>> learn about the
> Washington power structure.> >> > >>>> Good point, Griz. How do these
> guys get to be such experts on the => >USA> >> > >>>> anyway? I'm not
> even sure where Australia is -- down there near Ne=> >w> >> > >>>>
> Guinea someplace.> >> > >>>> JGL> >> > >>> They go to journalism
> school. Everything about the subject is cover=> >ed> >> > >>> in> >> >>>> the first semester.- Hide quoted text -> >> > >>> - Show quoted
>
> text -> >> > >> Sarcastic comments do not make up for the fact that
> Bugliosi (the> >> > >> saviour of the Lone Nut cause according to
> some) has been caught out=> >.> >> > >> BTW, Oz is doing extremely
> well in the Olympics seeing our populatio=> >n> >> > >> is a measley
> 21 mil.- Hide quoted text -> > >> > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide
> quoted text -> > >> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -> > >> -
> Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -> > - Show quoted text -- Hide
> quoted text -> > - Show quoted text -
why don't you post this so one can read it...... ya moron!
muc...@gmail.com
What difference would it make to you?
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:20712654-eb63-4ed2...@v16g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Hi tomnln,
Say, don't you want to discuss Donovan anymore? We both know HE
doesn't support your argument, don't we tomnln.
BTW, I wasn't aware that Folsom knew Oswald. I thought he was some guy
called as an expert witness after the assassination to comment on
Oswald's shooting record.
What's your proof that he KNEW Oswald, tomnln?
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Glad you brought up Donovan Tiummy;
He testified that marines in that unit had to have above IQ's.
He also said Oswald's IQ was better than most in the unit.
He also said Oswald was crew chief on several occassions.
He also said he wouldn't hesitate to put Oswald in charge again because
Oswald;s work was very good.
ps;
Are you Denying that Sgt. Delgado/Col. Folsom said Oswald was a Lousy shot?
How long are you gonna RUN from the destruction of evidence?>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------нн--------------------------------------------------------------------------н-н---
tims...@gmail.com
Oswald shooting a 212 and qualifying as a Marine Sharpshooter,
tomnln.Show where it had anything to do with him shooting a 212,
tomnln.Regards,Tim BrennanSydney, Australia*Newsgroup(s)
Commentator*On Aug 28, 10:16 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:> Hi
Timmy;> > Apparently you MISSED the testimony that on occasion a
message> > news:1f676411-be4c-4c31-a0f8-
a23f21...@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...> BUMPOn Aug 24, 6:02 pm,
timst...@gmail.com wrote:> TOP POST> > Hi> tomnln,> > Say, when I
asked you whether Oswald shot a 212 on the> rifle range,> qualifying
him as a sharpshooter, you replied, in this> very thread,> that:
*Nobody knows Timmy.*> > Isn't that right, tomnln?> > How then do you
explain this from the evidence/testimony,> > tomnln?:> >http://
www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh19/pages/WH_Vol19_0...>>
Sure looks like this guy, Folsom, knew back in the sixties that> >
Oswald> fired a 212, tomnln.> > That's evidence/testimony, tomnln.>
From the 26 volumes. To whit, 19 H> 16, tomnln.> > Why did you go>
against the evidence/testimony, tomnln?> > Don't you like the evidence/
> testimony anymore?> > Oh dear...> > Surprised Regards,> > Tim
Brennan>> Sydney, Australia> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*> > On Aug 21,
3:03 am,"tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:> > > > > <timst...@gmail.com>
wrote> > in message> > >news:>
TOP POST> > > Hi tomnln,> > > Say, there was no need for you to go> >
and open another thread on this> > particular matter, tomnln.> > >>
There was just a need for you, tomnln, to answer a simple question:>
>> Did Oswald shoot a 212 on the rifle range when he was a US
Marine,>> > which qualified him for the rank of Sharpshooter?> > >
That's all> > tomnln. Just answer the question, please. No need to
veer> > off on> some ridiculous tangent about *the destruction of
evidence* or> >> another repeat of your entirely fictitious 5' 3"
Oswald in Mexico> >> City, tomnln.> > > Do you fear the question,
tomnln?> > > Perhaps you> FEAR it.> > > Is that the case, tomnln?> > >
Concerned Regards,> > >> Tim Brennan> > Sydney, Australia> >
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*> > >> Nobody knows Timmy.> > > Considering
the testimony of Oswald's Sgt.> >> Sgt. Nelson Delgado said Oswald was
a Lousy shot.> > Delgado also said> sometimes a Marine's rifle score
was "Altered" to make the> > platoon> look good.> > > I believe Lt.
John Donovan said basically the samr> thing.> > > And, you're STUCK
with that official testimony.> > > On> Aug 17, 2:01 pm, "tomnln"
<tom...@cox.net> wrote:> > > ><timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message> >
> >news:f32f71f4-aec1-4707-> > ae81-
tomnln,> > > > Say, if Oswald was a *LOUSY* shot, as you claim, why>
did he attain the> > > rank of sharpshooter when he was in the Marines?
> > > > Curious Regards,> > > > Tim Brennan> > > Sydney, Australia> >>
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*> > > > Do I Really have to educate you
on> > the testimony of Sgt. Nelson Delgado> > > Timmy?> > > > See
Volume> VIII pages 236-239."Oswald was Lousy Shot> > > > Unless you
think it> was the time frame that you believe Oswald was....> > > 5
ft. 3 inches> tall> > > Blond Haired> > > 119 pounds.> > > > No wonder
you RUN from> the authorities Tampering with Evidence>>>> > > >http://
> whokilledjfk.net/Evid%20Tamp.htmhttp://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN...> >
>> RUN Timmy RUN> > >> >
> > > > On Aug 17, 1:22 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:> > > > >>
> In case McAdams don't post this one.> > > > > <JLeyden...@aol.com>>
wrote in message> > > > >news:>
c5803a954...@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...> > > > >>>> On Aug 13,
tims...@gmail.com
Better tidy up the spacing for ol' tomnln. He can barely comprehend as
it is, LOL!:
On Sep 2, 7:48 am, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tommy,
Say, I certainly MISSED anywhere where it applied to
Oswald shooting a 212 and qualifying as a Marine Sharpshooter,
tomnln.
Show where it had anything to do with him shooting a 212,
tomnln.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
ps Hey, I'm *tidying up* posts just like that fella lil' Benny *Yella
Pants* Holmes! :-) TB
On Aug 28, 10:16 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:> Hi
> Timmy;> > Apparently you MISSED the testimony that on occasion a
> marine's rifle score> was "ALTERED".> > <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in
> message> > news:1f676411-be4c-4c31-a0f8-
> a23f21ac2...@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...> BUMPOn Aug 24, 6:02 pm,timst...@gmail.com wrote:> TOP POST> > Hi> tomnln,> > Say, when I
>
> asked you whether Oswald shot a 212 on the> rifle range,> qualifying
> him as a sharpshooter, you replied, in this> very thread,> that:
> *Nobody knows Timmy.*> > Isn't that right, tomnln?> > How then do you
> explain this from the evidence/testimony,> > tomnln?:> >http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh19/pages/WH_Vol19_0...>>
> Sure looks like this guy, Folsom, knew back in the sixties that> >
> Oswald> fired a 212, tomnln.> > That's evidence/testimony, tomnln.>
> From the 26 volumes. To whit, 19 H> 16, tomnln.> > Why did you go>
> against the evidence/testimony, tomnln?> > Don't you like the evidence/> testimony anymore?> > Oh dear...> > Surprised Regards,> > Tim
>
> Brennan>> Sydney, Australia> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*> > On Aug 21,3:03 am,"tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:> > > > > <timst...@gmail.com>
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Don't you mean the same Folsom who said that a sharpshooter
qualification, like the one Oswald achieved, indicated a person being
a fairly good *shot*?
Is that the guy, tomnln?
BTW, why did you claim I've been running from your absurd Mexico City
page for over a year? I already showed it is in error, tomnln.
You've been running from that since January, tomnln.
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Aug 29, 1:47 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:ad781aad-f236-4cb8...@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> TOP POST
>
> Hi tomnln,
>
> Say, when I asked you whether Oswald shot a 212 on the rifle range,
> qualifying him as a sharpshooter, you replied, in this very thread,
> that: *Nobody knows Timmy.*
>
> Isn't that right, tomnln?
>
> How then do you explain this from the evidence/testimony, tomnln?:
>
> http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh19/pages/WH_Vol19_0...
>
> Sure looks like this guy, Folsom, knew back in the sixties that Oswald
> fired a 212, tomnln.
>
> That's evidence/testimony, tomnln. From the 26 volumes. To whit, 19 H
> 16, tomnln.
>
> Why did you go against the evidence/testimony, tomnln?
>
> Don't you like the evidence/testimony anymore?
>
> Oh dear...
>
> Surprised Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Timmy;
>
> Are you talking about the same Col. Folsom who described Oswald's rifle
> ability as "A Rather POOR Shot"?
>
> Don't forget these Timmy>>>
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/Evid%20Tamp.htmhttp://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
>
> You've been RUNNING from them for over a YEAR! ! !
>
> You don't condone "Evidence Tampering" do you Timmy?
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
aeffects
> TOP POST
>
> Better tidy up the spacing for ol' tomnln. He can barely comprehend as
> it is, LOL!:
don't bother, moron -- no one reads your nonsense anyway.... keep
coming back, toots-e-roll, it does get better!
Gil Jesus
>
> Some times I wonder if JFK didn't just expire from natural causes (he
> had health problems, you know) and his family, friends and admirers
> staged this whole assassination thing to assure him a higher place in
>
> JGL
Typical moronic Lowry post.
Gil Jesus
Actually, it sounds like typical flawed Von Pein reasoning:
"If Oswald didn't kill him, then he wasn't killed."
Gil Jesus
>
> Say, if Oswald was a *LOUSY* shot, as you claim, why did he attain the
> rank of sharpshooter when he was in the Marines?
>
They fudged his results.
Gil Jesus
>
> BTW, tomnln, Delgado told Bugliosi, under oath, in *On Trial: LHO*
> that Oswald wasn't really trying on the rifle range when Delgado knew
> him.
Was that the practice range or the qualifying range ?
How much effort would you expect an 18-year-old to put in when he was
being laughed at and ridiculed by his fellow Marines constantly ?
Get a life, Tim.
tomnln
Apparently you MISSED the testimony that on occasion a
marine's rifle score was "ALTERED".
Volume VIII, Pages 336-339.
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9297d609-12e0-4222...@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
Apparently you MISSED the testimony that on occasion a
marine's rifle score was "ALTERED".
Volume VIII, Pages 336-339.
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4c2969ea-8fb3-4359...@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b871ef23-09bf-4403...@a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Hi tomnln,
Don't you mean the same Folsom who said that a sharpshooter
qualification, like the one Oswald achieved, indicated a person being
a fairly good *shot*?
Is that the guy, tomnln?
BTW, why did you claim I've been running from your absurd Mexico City
page for over a year? I already showed it is in error, tomnln.
You've been running from that since January, tomnln.
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My Mexico City page proves that you believe that Oswald was....
5 ft. 3 inches tall
Blond Haired
119 pounds
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
I said you RAN from Evidence Tampering.
SEE>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
Apparently you MISSED the testimony that on occasion a
marine's rifle score> was "ALTERED".
Volume VIII pages 236-239.
"aeffects" <aeffe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0fb74ed0-48c7-4f53...@q26g2000prq.googlegroups.com...
tomnln
"Gil Jesus" <gjj...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:27dc6715-8866-4b1f...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...
They fudged his results.
Timmy MISSED Delgado's testinony os "Score Alterations" in Volume VIII pages
236-239.
tomnln
Get a life, Tim.
Timmy doesn't know that TV is designed for "Entertainment".
Timmy Hated Sylvia Duran's description of the Oswald in Mexico City as....
5 ft. 3 inches tall
Blond Haired
119 pounds.
SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomnln
"tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:R3Kuk.23603$Rs1...@newsfe08.iad...
>
> <tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:20712654-eb63-4ed2...@v16g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
> TOP POST
>
> Hi tomnln,
>
> Say, don't you want to discuss Donovan anymore? We both know HE
> doesn't support your argument, don't we tomnln.
>
> BTW, I wasn't aware that Folsom knew Oswald. I thought he was some guy
> called as an expert witness after the assassination to comment on
> Oswald's shooting record.
>
> What's your proof that he KNEW Oswald, tomnln?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Glad you brought up Donovan Timmy;
He testified that marines in that unit had to have above avge. IQ's.
Gil Jesus
>
> > Hi tomnln,
>
> > Say, if Oswald was a *LOUSY* shot, as you claim, why did he attain the
> > rank of sharpshooter when he was in the Marines?
>
> They fudged his results.
>
> Timmy MISSED Delgado's testinony os "Score Alterations" in Volume VIII pages
> 236-239.
Hi Timmy :
Here's testimony of how rifle scores were faked:
Mr. LIEBELER. You did not tell the FBI that in your opinion Oswald had
penciled in his qualifying score, did you? Or did you tell them that?
Mr. DELGADO. He may have done, you know; but if you got away with it
you were more than lucky.
Mr. LIEBELER. Did you talk to the FBI about that possibility?
Mr. DELGADO. Yes, I told him he ,nay have, to qualify, because there
was a lot of "Maggie's drawers" on his side. Now, he may have had some
way of knowing who was pulling, that is another thing. Yon don't know
who is out there in the pits, pulling it, see; and it could be a buddy
of yours or somebody you know, and they will help you out. you know,
get together, like before we all go and separate, you know, and I will
say to my buddy, "Well, look, I want to try and get on line 22, you
get on target 22 and I will try to be the first one on line"; so help
each other like that. And when they 7.o to the pits, they have their
choice of getting on the lines, you know, so I will try to work it out
with the fellow out there. But sometimes it doesn't work out that way.
You just have to take your chances.
Mr. LIEBELER. You told us that in this particular rifle practice, or
firing, that the scores were kept by NCOs.
Mr. DELGADO. Yes.
Mr. LIEBELER. Was it a common practice for the privates to make deals
like this with the noncommissioned officers in connection with a thing
like this?
Mr. DELGADO. They are making a deal with the other guys pulling the
targets. See, the guy back there is also keeping a score.
Now, your NCO, particularly your NCO, may want to push you or make you
qualify, because he doesn't want to spend another day out there on the
rifle range, see; so it's not all that strict. Like if I was line NCO
and I had five men in my section, and four of them qualified, that
means that some other day, maybe on my day off, I will have to come in
with this other fellow, so I will help him along and push each other
along.
You don't try to mess nobody up, but you can't take a man that is
shooting poorly and give him a 190 score, see; you could just give him
the bare minimum, 170 or 171, to make it look good.
Mr. LIEBELER. Just to qualify him?
MR. DELGADO. Just to qualify him.
MR. LIEBELER. So it is a possibility that that might have happened
even in this?
MR. DELGADO. Right.
( 8 H 238-239 )
It would really help if you people read the 26 volumes.
notifying regards,
Gil Jesus
"Newsgroups Commentator" Informer
United States of America
Ben Holmes
Gil Jesus says...
Just for the edification of the Non-Marines on this forum, "Sharpshooter" is
only AVERAGE in the Marine Corps. It would be dead center of the bell curve for
Marine Corps shooters. Even low scoring "Experts" would be only slightly better
than average. There's a *world* of difference between someone shooting a 220
(which gives you "Expert", and someone who most would consider truly expert
firing a 242)
tomnln
"Gil Jesus" <gjj...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f21ac2ca-79d9-40ae...@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Your 5' 3" Mexican midget nonsense has been debunked numerous times,
tomnln, and you know it. Mrs Duran identifies Oswald TWICE, with the
aid of his NOPD mugshot, as the man she met in Mexico City, in the
VERY SAME HSCA interview from which you cobbled together your hopeless
blond midget nonsense, tomnln. LOL! That's no approach to research,
tomnln.
The interesting subject at hand is Lieutanant Colonel A G Folsom, who
stated a person achieving a Sharpshooter status in the Marines would
have been a fairly good shot.
Oswald shot a 212 and achieved Sharpshooter status, tomnln, even
though you claimed that NOBODY knew if that was the case or not. You
were simply wrong once again, tomnln. Don't you know the evidence/
testimony, tomnln?
It's all there in Anderson Exhibit No. 1 in the WC volumes, tomnln.
Isn't that the case, tomnln?
Do you need help finding Anderson Exhibit No. 1, tomnln?
I thought you knew the evidence/testimony, tomnln.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Sep 3, 3:36 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:b871ef23-09bf-4403...@a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
> TOP POST
>
> Hi tomnln,
>
> Don't you mean the same Folsom who said that a sharpshooter
> qualification, like the one Oswald achieved, indicated a person being
> a fairly good *shot*?
>
> Is that the guy, tomnln?
>
> BTW, why did you claim I've been running from your absurd Mexico City
> page for over a year? I already showed it is in error, tomnln.
>
> You've been running from that since January, tomnln.
>
> Concerned Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Hi Timmy;
>
> > Are you talking about the same Col. Folsom who described Oswald's rifle
> > ability as "A Rather POOR Shot"?
>
> > Don't forget these Timmy>>>
>
> >http://whokilledjfk.net/Evid%20Tamp.htmhttp://whokilledjfk.net/mexcit...
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Say, what does all that nonsense you posted about Donovan prove about
Oswald's shooting ability, tomnln? Nothing, that's what. he told the
Secret Service he couldn't comment on Oswald's shooting ability,
didn't he tomnln.
As for A. G. Folsom Jr, Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Marine Corps, Head,
Records Branch, Personnel Department, he stated that a Marine
qualifying as a Sharpshooter indicated that that Marine was a fairly
good shot, in other words, based on Oswald's record, he was a fairly
good shot.
BTW, Folsom was just some records guy who sent a letter to the WC
detailing Oswald's shooting record. There is no indication the he knew
Oswald. Why did you claim the he KNEW Oswald, tomnln?
Looks like another thing you got wrong on evidence/testimony, tomnln.
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Sep 3, 4:35 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> BUMP 2 FOR TIMMY;
>
> "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
>
> news:R3Kuk.23603$Rs1...@newsfe08.iad...
>
>
>
>
>
> > <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:20712654-eb63-4ed2...@v16g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
> > TOP POST
>
> > Hi tomnln,
>
> > Say, don't you want to discuss Donovan anymore? We both know HE
> > doesn't support your argument, don't we tomnln.
>
> > BTW, I wasn't aware that Folsom knew Oswald. I thought he was some guy
> > called as an expert witness after the assassination to comment on
> > Oswald's shooting record.
>
> > What's your proof that he KNEW Oswald, tomnln?
>
> > Regards,
>
> > Tim Brennan
> > Sydney, Australia
> > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Glad you brought up Donovan Timmy;
>
> He testified that marines in that unit had to have above avge. IQ's.
>
> He also said Oswald's IQ was better than most in the unit.
>
> He also said Oswald was crew chief on several occassions.
>
> He also said he wouldn't hesitate to put Oswald in charge again because
> Oswald;s work was very good.
>
> ps;
> Are you Denying that Sgt. Delgado/Col. Folsom said Oswald was a Lousy shot?
>
> How long are you gonna RUN from the destruction of evidence?>>>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
> http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 29, 11:01 am, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:5d380b75-0072-4248...@p10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> >> TOP POST
>
> >> Hi tomnln,
>
> >> I thought Donovan told the Secret Service he was unable to comment on
> >> Oswald's ability on the rifle range?
>
> >> Regards,
>
> >> Tim Brennan
> >> Sydney, Australia
> >> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> TWO (2) people who KNEW Oswald said Oswald was a lousy shot Timmy.
>
> >> Sgt. Delgado
> >> Col. Folsom
>
> >> HOW well did YOU know Oswald Timmy???
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >> > > > An NRA Master is qualified to compete in Olympic Competition.- Hide quoted text -
tomnln
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b8a72d5b-13d3-4972...@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Hi tomnln,
Say, what does all that nonsense you posted about Donovan prove about
Oswald's shooting ability, tomnln? Nothing, that's what. he told the
Secret Service he couldn't comment on Oswald's shooting ability,
didn't he tomnln.
As for A. G. Folsom Jr, Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Marine Corps, Head,
Records Branch, Personnel Department, he stated that a Marine
qualifying as a Sharpshooter indicated that that Marine was a fairly
good shot, in other words, based on Oswald's record, he was a fairly
good shot.
BTW, Folsom was just some records guy who sent a letter to the WC
detailing Oswald's shooting record. There is no indication the he knew
Oswald. Why did you claim the he KNEW Oswald, tomnln?
Looks like another thing you got wrong on evidence/testimony, tomnln.
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I notice you DODGE the man who DID know Oswald.......Sgt. Nelson Delgado.
Maybe Delgado was....
5 ft. 3 inches tall
Blond haired
119 pounds.
You seem to RUN from people like that.
You also RUN from the authorities Destroying Evidence Repeatedly! ! !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tims...@gmail.com
Hi tomnln,
Say, thanks to DVP we have a partial transcript here of what Nelson
Delgado said when he was examined, under oath, by Vincent Bugliosi in
*On Trial: Lee Harvey Oswald.* The good thing about the *On Trial:LHO*
material is that Bugliosi was able to clarify many questions that had
come up, or been posed by conspiracy theorists, in the wake of the WC
and HSCA investigations.
QUOTE ON:
MR. BUGLIOSI -- "You're aware that at the time Oswald was doing poorly
on the range, he was about to be released from the Marines, is that
correct?"
MR. DELGADO -- "Yes, he was."
MR. BUGLIOSI -- "Are you aware that in 1956, when Oswald first joined
the Marines, and was going through Basic Training, he fired a 212 on
the rifle range with an M-1 rifle, which made him a 'sharpshooter' at
that time -- are you aware of that?"
MR. DELGADO -- "Yes."
MR. BUGLIOSI -- "Given the fact that Oswald was about to get out of
the Marines when he was in your unit, and the fact that he showed no
interest in firing on the range -- you don't attribute his poor
showing on the range to his being a poor shot?"
MR. DELGADO -- "No."
MR. BUGLIOSI -- "He could have done better, you felt, if he tried?"
MR. DELGADO -- "Certainly."
QUOTE OFF
I don't think Mr Delgado is much help to your side of the debate,
tomnln. You'd have to wonder why Gil Jesus uses an old video of
Delgado on his website, but doesn't bother with something more modern
that clarifies some of the questions raised, like a clip from
*OT:LHO*, for example. Of course, Gil isn't interested in any form of
balanced debate, LOL!
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On Sep 4, 12:07 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:b8a72d5b-13d3-4972...@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> TOP POST
>
> Hi tomnln,
>
> Say, what does all that nonsense you posted about Donovan prove about
> Oswald's shooting ability, tomnln? Nothing, that's what. he told the
> Secret Service he couldn't comment on Oswald's shooting ability,
> didn't he tomnln.
>
> As for A. G. Folsom Jr, Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Marine Corps, Head,
> Records Branch, Personnel Department, he stated that a Marine
> qualifying as aSharpshooterindicated that that Marine was a fairly
> > >> > > rank ofsharpshooterwhen he was in the Marines?
tims...@gmail.com
Bump.
ps Say, tomnln, your (sic) not running, are you? Sure looks like it to
me, tomnln! TB :-)
On Sep 14, 2:32 pm, timst...@gmail.com wrote:
> TOP POST
>
> Hitomnln,
>
> Say, thanks to DVP we have a partial transcript here of what Nelson
> Delgado said when he was examined, under oath, by Vincent Bugliosi in
> *On Trial: Lee Harvey Oswald.* The good thing about the *On Trial:LHO*
> material is that Bugliosi was able to clarify many questions that had
> come up, or been posed by conspiracy theorists, in the wake of the WC
> and HSCA investigations.
>
> QUOTE ON:
>
> MR. BUGLIOSI -- "You're aware that at the time Oswald was doing poorly
> on the range, he was about to be released from the Marines, is that
> correct?"
>
> MR. DELGADO -- "Yes, he was."
>
> MR. BUGLIOSI -- "Are you aware that in 1956, when Oswald first joined
> the Marines, and was going through Basic Training, he fired a 212 on
> the rifle range with an M-1 rifle, which made him a 'sharpshooter' at
> that time -- are you aware of that?"
>
> MR. DELGADO -- "Yes."
>
> MR. BUGLIOSI -- "Given the fact that Oswald was about to get out of
> the Marines when he was in your unit, and the fact that he showed no
> interest in firing on the range -- you don't attribute his poor
> showing on the range to his being a poor shot?"
>
> MR. DELGADO -- "No."
>
> MR. BUGLIOSI -- "He could have done better, you felt, if he tried?"
>
> MR. DELGADO -- "Certainly."
>
> QUOTE OFF
>
> I don't think Mr Delgado is much help to your side of the debate,tomnln. You'd have to wonder why Gil Jesus uses an old video of
> Delgado on his website, but doesn't bother with something more modern
> that clarifies some of the questions raised, like a clip from
> *OT:LHO*, for example. Of course, Gil isn't interested in any form of
> balanced debate, LOL!
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> On Sep 4, 12:07 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > <timst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:b8a72d5b-13d3-4972...@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > TOP POST
>
> > Hitomnln,
>
> > Say, what does all that nonsense you posted about Donovan prove about
> > Oswald's shooting ability,tomnln? Nothing, that's what. he told the
> > > >> > There was just a need for you,tomnln, to answer a simple question:
>
> > > >> > Did Oswald shoot a 212 on the rifle range when he was a US Marine,
> > > >> > which qualified him for the rank ofSharpshooter?
>
> > > >> > That's alltomnln. Just answer the question, please. No need to veer
> ...
>
> read more »
tomnln
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
<tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ac907078-cbc1-4930...@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...