Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Dr Lattimer said:

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Walt

unread,
Oct 15, 2008, 2:30:45 PM10/15/08
to
Quote...." If you look at the evidence, both bullets were recovered
and both came out Oswald's gun to the exclusion of all
others"...unquote

In the book "The Assassination Chain", by Sybil Leek and Bert R.
Sugar , on page 57 there is a New York Times newspaper story ( 2 /
25 / 76) in which says that Dr John K. Lattimore, a medical
investigtor was the first outsider permitted to look at the Kennedy
autopsy photographs and X-rays.

The story says that Dr Lattimore is an rxpert on medical ballistics
and President of the American Urology Association and chairman of the
Urology Department at Columbia University School of Medicine in NYC.

"In an interview Mr.Lattimore said last night, ...." If you look at
the evidence, both bullets were recovered and both came out Oswald's
gun to the exclusion of all others"...unquote

Obviously Dr Lattimore is our own Dr Lattimer..... And he was an
"expert who examined the autopst photos ans X-rays and saw that the
evidence showed that ....BOTH BULLETS WERE RECOVERED ....

Hey Pea Brain, Isn't this interesting?? Two FBI agents named Siebert
and Oneill signed for and RECEIVED ONE of those bullets.....

I'm guessing that the OTHER bullet that Dr. Lattimore was referring to
was CE 399 which was recovered at Parkland hospital.

cdddraftsman

unread,
Oct 15, 2008, 2:53:43 PM10/15/08
to

Psssst ..... Waltards ..... getting yer crime degree otta a 'crack
jacks' box isn't
going to stop the river of tears wept over yer loss of Ozzie's status
as 'Patsy'
in this crime . get over it and quit making a embarrassment out of
yourself , have
you no pride or satifactioin left being classified as just a 'Kook' or
does it have
to be put in the 'Official Records' ?

Recommendation :

Relocate yer hindquarters away from yer headquarters .....
immediately !

tl

Walt

unread,
Oct 15, 2008, 3:04:03 PM10/15/08
to

What!!??..... You think I should be proud and satisfied as being "just
a 'kook'

My old Grandpa allwise said: don't settle for being mediocre ...be the
best.


> Recommendation :
>
> Relocate yer hindquarters away from yer headquarters .....
> immediately !
>

> tl- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Message has been deleted

David Von Pein

unread,
Oct 15, 2008, 3:55:32 PM10/15/08
to

Only a kook like Walt would start up a stupid thread like this one.

By "both bullets", quite obviously, Dr. Lattimer was referring to
CE399 (from Parkland) and the two large fragments of ONE single bullet
found in the front seat of the limo (CE567 & 569).

Hence, when combined, "both bullets" were, indeed, recovered and both
were fired by Oswald's gun (or at least a large enough majority of the
head-shot bullet to determine that it, like 399, had been fired
through Oswald's C2766 rifle "to the exclusion").

But Lattimer most certainly WASN'T talking about any bullet fragments
handled by O'Neill and Sibert at the autopsy. Only a goof could think
Lattimer was talking about the O'Neill/Sibert "missile".

Vince Bugliosi, when using general terms, has also referred to the
"two bullets" that hit the 2 victims in ways very similar to the
Lattimer example:

"The evidence will show that Oswald's rifle, to the exclusion of
all other weapons, was determined by firearms experts to be the rifle
that fired the two bullets that struck down President Kennedy. ....
The two large bullet fragments found inside the Presidential limousine
were parts of a bullet fired from Oswald's rifle to the exclusion of
all other weapons. .... So we KNOW, not just beyond a reasonable
doubt, we know beyond ALL doubt THAT OSWALD'S RIFLE WAS THE MURDER
WEAPON!!" -- V. BUGLIOSI; 1986 T.V. DOCU-TRIAL

Walt

unread,
Oct 15, 2008, 4:15:29 PM10/15/08
to

Dear LOB.... In a recent post I wrote how easy it would be to create
false bullets, projectiles, missiles, slugs, or anyname commonly used
for a projectile of a cartridge. It's a piece-o-cake to fire a
smaller calber missile, like a 6.5mm (.264") into a barrel of water
and then remove that pristine bullet with the ballistic finger print
of a specific 6.5 rifle. and then place that 6.5mm missile in a teflon
sabot ( sleeve) and set in in a larger ( 30.06. 7.65mm. 8mm) caliber
with a reduced powder charge so the bullet would have great
penetration power. That cartridge could then be used to fire the
missile into a murder victim where it would be found during an
autopsy. The ballistic evidence would indicate that the missile had
been fired from a 6.5mm rifle when in reality it had been fired from a
larger caliber rifle.

David Von Pein

unread,
Oct 15, 2008, 4:24:29 PM10/15/08
to

Whoopee!

IOW -- Who cares?

Walt

unread,
Oct 15, 2008, 5:01:19 PM10/15/08
to
On 15 Oct, 15:24, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> Whoopee!
>
> IOW -- Who cares?

IOW..... I kicked ya in the balls and yer speechless.......

David Von Pein

unread,
Oct 15, 2008, 7:05:22 PM10/15/08
to

No, Walt, it's just another case of you (a CT-lovin' kook) pointing
out something that has no bearing on this case at all (i.e., the sabot
thing).

Per your comment above about "sabots", nobody could EVER come to the
conclusion that a particular person with a particular gun fired a
bullet into a murder victim, merely because the POSSIBILITY always
exists that a "sabot" was used.

IOW -- No murderer could ever be convicted on bullet evidence. Ever.

IOW #2 -- Walt is spitting out theories that he knows can never be
proven (as per usual)....but he'll spit them out anyway.

Walt

unread,
Oct 15, 2008, 7:42:40 PM10/15/08
to
On 15 Oct, 18:05, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> No, Walt, it's just another case of you (a CT-lovin' kook) pointing
> out something that has no bearing on this case at all (i.e., the sabot
> thing).
>
> Per your comment above about "sabots", nobody could EVER come to the
> conclusion that a particular person with a particular gun fired a
> bullet into a murder victim, merely because the POSSIBILITY always
> exists that a "sabot" was used.
>
> IOW -- No murderer could ever be convicted on bullet evidence. Ever.

Yer dumber than Rob.... At the time that you bastards murdered JFK
sabots were unknown in the civilian community.
But intelligence agencies certainly knew how to make them and use
them.

Message has been deleted

David Von Pein

unread,
Oct 15, 2008, 9:37:04 PM10/15/08
to

>>> "Yer dumber than Rob...." <<<

LOL.

>>> "At the time that you bastards murdered JFK[,] sabots were unknown in the civilian community." <<<


Oh, goodie. Now I'm accused of killing JFK too. Nice.


>>> "But intelligence agencies certainly knew how to make them and use them." <<<

Which means that JFK positively was killed by Sebastian "Sabot", right
Walt-Kook?

Thanks for the "sabot" history lesson, Walt-Kook.

Most enlightening.

EL-OH-EL!!

cdddraftsman

unread,
Oct 15, 2008, 11:19:34 PM10/15/08
to

Now we know why a representative proportion (20%) of Americans think
Joan of Ark was Noah's wife . They have thinking patterns that aren't
classifiable by any known standards . If it were just a case of
circular thinking I could hop on a merry-go-round and that
would help stop me ears from hurten from the silly
assertions that spring forth from Walts factiod
foundry . As far as my headaches from
trying to fathom that he uses scenario's
never proven to be the case in the
history of firearms , nothing helps
that at all .

tl


Walt

unread,
Oct 16, 2008, 4:05:21 PM10/16/08
to
On 15 Oct, 20:37, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>> "Yer dumber than Rob...." <<<
>
> LOL.
>
"At the time that you bastards murdered JFK[,] sabots were unknown in
the civilian community." <<<

Oh, goodie. Now I'm accused of killing JFK too. Nice.

Accessory after he fact.... One who assists subordinately the chief
agent in the commission of a crime. One who aids and abets the chief
agent of a crime in that agents escape.

Yup.... looks to me like yer an accessory to murder.

tomnln

unread,
Oct 16, 2008, 4:16:10 PM10/16/08
to
Wally World uses ANOTHER of my quotes.

"Walt" <papakoc...@evertek.net> wrote in message
news:3e98cc17-4f24-4252...@y29g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

Walt

unread,
Oct 16, 2008, 5:17:45 PM10/16/08
to
On 16 Oct, 15:16, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> Wally World uses ANOTHER of my quotes.


WHERE??? I've never called anybody "child molester"......


> "Walt" <papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote in message

> >> EL-OH-EL!!- Hide quoted text -

tomnln

unread,
Oct 16, 2008, 8:20:04 PM10/16/08
to

"Walt" <papakoc...@evertek.net> wrote in message
news:99a78929-7da0-450d...@c60g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

> On 16 Oct, 15:16, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>> Wally World uses ANOTHER of my quotes.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wally wrote;

> WHERE??? I've never called anybody "child molester"......


I write;

"child molester" is YOUR Alias;

My line that you Stole is "Accessories After the Fact".

When are you gonna address your LIES">>>
You never proved that 133-a had "Dual Sling Mounts".
When are you gonna Prove that LHO worked for RFK???
You never proved that Walker called Germany.
You never proved Oswald ordered a 40 inch rifle.
You never proved Mike Paine gave the DOD a copy of 133-a on 11/22/63.
You never proved the wallet was found "INSIDE" the owner's car.
You never proved Michael Paine had same model rifle.
You never proved Walker believed LHO shot at him.
You never proved that Capt O A Jones said LHO shot AT Walker.
You never proved that the bullet recovered from Walker shooting was copper
jacketed.
You never proved LHO received a 40 minch rifle.
You never proved your claim that LHO shot at Walker.
You never proved that LHO ordered a 40 inch rifle.
You never proved your claim that LHOI altered the chin in CE-133-a.
You never proved your claim that a 6.5 was fired from a "sabot".
You never proved your claim that the CIA was gonna "rescue Oswald".
You never proved your claim that the DPD showed Weitzman a Mauser on
11/22/63.

You're a Warren Commission Shill! ! !
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Walt

unread,
Oct 17, 2008, 11:53:45 AM10/17/08
to
On 16 Oct, 19:20, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> "Walt" <papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote in message
>
> news:99a78929-7da0-450d...@c60g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...> On 16 Oct, 15:16, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> Wally World uses ANOTHER of my quotes.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­-------------------------------------------------------

And your a old, senile, homosexual, pervert, who solicits sex from
other men on the internet.

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­-------------------------------------------------------


>
>
>
> >> "Walt" <papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote in message
>
> >>news:3e98cc17-4f24-4252...@y29g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On 15 Oct, 20:37, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> "Yer dumber than Rob...." <<<
>
> >> >> LOL.
>
> >> > "At the time that you bastards murdered JFK[,] sabots were unknown in
> >> > the civilian community." <<<
>
> >> > Oh, goodie. Now I'm accused of killing JFK too. Nice.
>
> >> > Accessory after he fact.... One who assists subordinately the chief
> >> > agent in the commission of a crime. One who aids and abets the chief
> >> > agent of a crime in that agents escape.
>
> >> > Yup.... looks to me like yer an accessory to murder.
>
> >> >> >>> "But intelligence agencies certainly knew how to make them and use
> >> >> >>> them." <<<
>
> >> >> Which means that JFK positively was killed by Sebastian "Sabot", right
> >> >> Walt-Kook?
>
> >> >> Thanks for the "sabot" history lesson, Walt-Kook.
>
> >> >> Most enlightening.
>
> >> >> EL-OH-EL!!- Hide quoted text -
>

> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

tomnln

unread,
Oct 17, 2008, 1:40:37 PM10/17/08
to

"Walt" <papakoc...@evertek.net> wrote in message
news:cb2a9b46-3608-4654...@c60g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

And your a old, senile, homosexual, pervert, who solicits sex from
other men on the internet.

I write;

Hey Semen Lips;
Here's what you gotta Answer For>>>

When are you gonna address your LIES">>>
You never proved that 133-a had "Dual Sling Mounts".
When are you gonna Prove that LHO worked for RFK???
You never proved that Walker called Germany.
You never proved Oswald ordered a 40 inch rifle.
You never proved Mike Paine gave the DOD a copy of 133-a on 11/22/63.
You never proved the wallet was found "INSIDE" the owner's car.
You never proved Michael Paine had same model rifle.
You never proved Walker believed LHO shot at him.
You never proved that Capt O A Jones said LHO shot AT Walker.
You never proved that the bullet recovered from Walker shooting was copper
jacketed.
You never proved LHO received a 40 minch rifle.
You never proved your claim that LHO shot at Walker.
You never proved that LHO ordered a 40 inch rifle.
You never proved your claim that LHOI altered the chin in CE-133-a.
You never proved your claim that a 6.5 was fired from a "sabot".
You never proved your claim that the CIA was gonna "rescue Oswald".
You never proved your claim that the DPD showed Weitzman a Mauser on
11/22/63.

You're a Warren Commission Shill! ! !

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 new messages