"stealth emailer"....
pklio
If you know, please tell me where to find it...
THX..
Sugien
"pklio" <pk...@fiberia.com> wrote in message
news:9aa6lh$sr5$1...@cinderella.biglobe.net.tw...
> Has any one heard of " stealth emailer" this program??
> If you know, please tell me where to find it...
>
> THX..
>
>
There is one I wrote called "Almost stealth emailer" would that be it?
--
http://dino-soft.org
/}
@###{ ]:home.adelphia.net/~dinosoft::>
\}
http://dinosoft.de.vu
Allen
want me to send it to you...?
PS: Hmm. I just read some of your previous posts... sounds like you're into
BO2k...
"pklio" <pk...@fiberia.com> wrote in message
news:9aa6lh$sr5$1...@cinderella.biglobe.net.tw...
Nick FitzGerald
> There is one I wrote called "Almost stealth emailer" would that be it?
Is that because it "almost works"?
Mind you, "almost works" is a fairly loose standard for Soooog given
the "quality" of his news header munger...
--
Nick FitzGerald
pklio
Could you tell me where to find it??
(PS. http://dino-soft.org
Is this your webpage?.. It is really cool!!!)
Sugien <gen...@mindless.com> wrote in message
news:Np6y6.28837$St6.46...@news2.news.adelphia.net...
pklio
Thank you....!!
(Bo2k is really a good remote control tool!!!...)
Allen <Web...@houPANDAston.rr.com> wrote in message
news:SH6y6.22264$wx.47...@typhoon.austin.rr.com...
Sugien
"Nick FitzGerald" <ni...@virus-l.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:01c0bbee$ef3f7da0$0500000a@mobilenick...
I never received any complaints and only praises from those that used it.
Can you say anything like that about any software you have ever wrote? I
would guess not seeing as how I don't think you have ever wrote anything.
>
>
> --
> Nick FitzGerald
even my worst application I ever wrote several years ago when first learning
would be better then your best current effort.
Just remember those that can do and those that can't flap there jaws like
you do.
Sugien
> Maybe..it is
> Could you tell me where to find it??
> (PS. http://dino-soft.org
> Is this your webpage?.. It is really cool!!!)
Yep that is my web page Thanks for the compliment on it. I need to update
it and make it a tad better, I haven't updated it for a while, I made it
with Macromedia's Flash version 4 I now have Macromedia's Flash Version 5
and I am not sure if I like version 5 better than version 4, so I guess I
will have to update my page by trying it out; but from what I have seen of
it so far I like version 4 far better. My almost stealth emailer can be
found on my freeware download page at:
http://www.zoomnet.net/~quick/myprograms/almoststealthemailer.html
it is almost stealth in as much that you can put it is from anyone and such;
but if they can read a header they can still see your IP.
PaX
update
it and make it a tad better, I haven't updated it for a while, I made it
with Macromedia's Flash version 4 I now have Macromedia's Flash Version 5
and I am not sure if I like version 5 better than version 4, so I guess I
will have to update my page by trying it out; but from what I have seen of
it so far I like version 4 far better. My almost stealth emailer can be
found on my freeware download page at:<<<<
Have a look at http://xdude.com sugien =]
this guy really is a flash master...
rgrds Dalt
Nick FitzGerald
> I never received any complaints and only praises from those that used it.
> Can you say anything like that about any software you have ever wrote? I
> would guess not seeing as how I don't think you have ever wrote anything.
I can assure the readers that the best application I have ever wrote
was wroten in far betta gramma and speling then yours eva cud bee.
> even my worst application I ever wrote several years ago when first learning
> would be better then your best current effort.
As I am not a s/w developer -- as I have said many times -- I will not
(in fact cannot) contest your claim s it is meaningless. You are
claiming something you cretaed is better than something I have not
created. You clearly live in a metphysically-challenged state...
> Just remember those that can do and those that can't flap there jaws like
> you do.
You forgot the third category -- those who can't but are also so thick
they don't realize it so insist on flaunting the yawning chasm of their
inadequacy in public.
Which of the two of us might that be, do you think?
--
Nick FitzGerald
Nick FitzGerald
<<snip>>
> ... My almost stealth emailer can be
> found on my freeware download page at:
>
> http://www.zoomnet.net/~quick/myprograms/almoststealthemailer.html
>
> it is almost stealth in as much that you can put it is from anyone and such;
> but if they can read a header they can still see your IP.
[In a desperate effort to bring this thread vaguely on-topic...]
Ahhhhh -- so it is almost stealth in the sense that a program that
shows no sign whatsoever of self-replication apart from displaying
a dialog box that says "<filename> is self-replicating now" is
"almost a virus"?
Good one Sooooog.
What will you bring us next -- the "almost a newspaper column"?
You know, in all its manifestations and variations the word
"lamer" really cannot be made cruel and miserable enough to do you
justice...
--
Nick FitzGerald
Nick FitzGerald
> http://www.zoomnet.net/~quick/myprograms/almoststealthemailer.html
Which redirects and d/ls a file from your son's web space at:
http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/
Michael apparently takes after his father, eh Soooog?
Has he ever tested his web site from other than his (or perhaps that
is *your*) PC??
What's the bet there is a directory tree named:
c:\michael\!!!my webpage
on that machine.
Doh!
--
Nick FitzGerald
Tetractys
> Sugien wrote:
> > There is one I wrote called "Almost stealth emailer"
> would that be it?
> Is that because it "almost works"?
>
> Mind you, "almost works" is a fairly loose standard
> for Soooog given the "quality" of his news header munger...
Is the original question referring to the difference between
truly anonymous remailers and pseudo-anonymous remailers?
If so, a good explanation is here:
Sugien
"PaX" <p...@demonoids.org> wrote in message
news:aOsy6.2793$_a3.3...@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com...
seen are better than mine ;o)
Sugien
"brainiac" <anm...@mixmaster.shinn.net> wrote in message
news:66e3d53fc688c81d...@anonymous.poster...
> NOTICE: This message may not have been sent by the Sender Name
> above. Always use cryptographic digital signatures to verify
> the identity of the sender of any usenet post or e-mail.
>
>
>
> In article <stsy6.28893$St6.47...@news2.news.adelphia.net>
> "Sugien" <gen...@mindless.com> wrote:
>
> Your site is a classic example of too much bandwidth, no content. All
sound and fury signifying nothing....not a thing, nada, total zero lameness.
Get the hint "genius?"
>
If you don't like it don't go there!!; but those that do seem to like it.
They like my freeware programs, and my poetry and some even like my gospel
music, all original I might add.
Sugien
I am rubber you are glue what you say bounces off me and sticks to you,
nanna nanna po po
besides I was only answering a posted question. btw, my first column is
coming out this Monday, but don't even ask the name of the paper, I am only
telling my friends the name of the paper; because I don't want any asinine
blowhard like you mucking up the works. Oh yeal, you can call it vaporware
column all you like, because I know it is real, and those that I have given
the name of the paper to they know it is real, so I am especially waiting
for you and a few others to say how you think it is vaporware and I can
archive them, and after I archive few I might, that is just *might* tell
you the name of the paper.
Sugien
I would be willing to bet every machine on my home LAN against yours
that you are wrong!, everything you have said above is wrong! I use to
think you had a little knowledge about networks but now I know you sure
don't I can see you are a real numb nuts when it comes to the internet,
come on if you think an account on a ISP is a home computer? FYI, that web
page belongs to a friend of mine from church and *she* allows me to use it
when I run out of space to put my *freeware* programs up for download, and
because my son is in here Sunday school class and she doesn't use here web
page space she allows him to host his gamers page on here web space. I have
been learning him all of a few weeks how to make a web page, and I bet he
can already create a better web page using only a text editor then you can
if you use front page express or home site or any other web page in a can
web page maker. You see I taught him to use a plane ole text editor and to
learn the tags to make his pages.
But keep spouting your trash nick, you are the butt of many a joke
around here, when the local pc club meets at my house. This recent one
should have them rolling on the floor with tears in there eyes when I show
them how you think a ISP web page is actually one of my pc's, I can hardly
type and laugh at the same time, thanks you have given me my chuckle for the
week.
btw, I can tell from your comments that you have been browsing around in his
folder at zoonment, you might want to be careful you never know what you
might open up, lol; but seriously he knows it won't work as it is, that is
why a link to it is *not* posted anywhere he still has to make all the links
relative.
br13n
wrote:
<snip>
> Oh yeal, you can call it vaporware
>column all you like, because I know it is real, and those that I have given
>the name of the paper to they know it is real, so I am especially waiting
>for you and a few others to say how you think it is vaporware and I can
>archive them, and after I archive few I might, that is just *might* tell
>you the name of the paper.
Count me in Sugs? I would like to see what you have to say outside of
this forum, tainted as it is. But let's face it - that's the nature of
the beast, as many others have already said before, about acv!
Brien
Tim the Baker
wrote:
>"Nick FitzGerald" <ni...@virus-l.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:01c0bcc5$2d6ef700$0500000a@mobilenick...
>> Has he ever tested his web site from other than his (or perhaps that
>> is *your*) PC??
>>
>> What's the bet there is a directory tree named:
>> c:\michael\!!!my webpage on that machine.
>>
>> Doh!
> I would be willing to bet every machine on my home LAN against yours
>that you are wrong!,
Erm Sugien.....Don't be to hasty with that bet :)
Source code from Frame that actually works is:
<BODY BACKGROUND="36.jpg">
<A HREF="file://C:\michael\!!!my webpage/rightside.html"
TARGET="CONTENT">Main</a><P>
DBZ STUFF
<HR>
<A HREF="file://C:\michael\!!!my webpage\rightsideimages.html"
TARGET="CONTENT">Images</A><P>
<A HREF="file://C:\michael\!!!my webpage\rightsidepowerlevels.html"
TARGET="CONTENT">Character Power Levels</A>
<Snipped rest of code>
tim
Nick FitzGerald
complete and profoundly disturbing ignorance by writing:
> > Michael apparently takes after his father, eh Soooog?
> >
> > Has he ever tested his web site from other than his (or perhaps that
> > is *your*) PC??
> >
> > What's the bet there is a directory tree named:
> >
> > c:\michael\!!!my webpage
> >
> > on that machine.
> >
> > Doh!
>
> I would be willing to bet every machine on my home LAN against yours
> that you are wrong!, ...
Great.
Not that I really want them, but because you are such dim-witted, moronic
prat, you just lost all your computers.
> ... everything you have said above is wrong! I use to
No -- everything I said was right. Nearly everything you said *is wrong*.
Are we surprised? No...
I know you are too stupid to understand this Soooog -- hell, so does
everyone else who ever reads more than four words you've ever written
here -- but I tend to be not wrong with an extraordinarily high rate
and consistency. You, on the other hand, struggle to get things right
most of the time. Worse for you though, is you have an extraordinary
ability to get things utterly screwed up, and even worse, when you are
the slightest bit riled you not only jump in feet first with your eyes
closed and your few remaining functional brain cells deactivated, but we
can almost guarantee that reaction. That is what happened here.
> think you had a little knowledge about networks but now I know you sure
> don't ...
And you're wrong again...
> ... I can see you are a real numb nuts when it comes to the internet,
> come on if you think an account on a ISP is a home computer? ...
Did I say that?
No. Read my post again Soooog, or better yet, visit the web site and
test it "intelligently" -- oh, sorry, you won't be able to do that, will
you? How unfair of me for suggesting that you should when I know you do
not have the necessary "equipment".
You see, your problem is that, beyond acting out that you believe your
own hype about being an uber-hacker, you actully live the lie as well.
Any vaguely sentient being would realize that I am not as stupid as you
seem to believe and, if they were otherwise like you, would remember
that I have shown them to be devastatingly wrong (often) in the past and
would at least have popped on over to:
http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/michael/
to check how it was that I correctly "divined" that the machine(s)
Michael uses for writing his web site have the directory:
c:\michael\!!!my webpage
Had you the intellect and memory facilities to lead you to that path of
action, you should -- oh uber-hacker, oh web wizard, oh god of all
things computer-ish -- have quickly noticed that the leftside.html
"menu" contains a bunch of links such as:
[A HREF="file://C:\michael\!!!my webpage\rightsidedeathlistguide.html"
TARGET="CONTENT"]Deathlist [/A][P]
[A HREF="file://C:\michael\!!!my webpage\rightsidesaiyanlevels.html"
TARGET="CONTENT"]Saiyan Levels[/A][P]
[A HREF="file://C:\michael\!!!my webpage\rightsidecharacterbios.html"
TARGET="CONTENT"]Characerbios[/a]
[Note: I've "fixed" the angle brackets so any over-zealous HTML-
capable newsreaders won't detract from the intended effect.]
Now, couple that with my earlier suggestion that Michael has never
tested the site from other than the machine where he authored the pages
initially and see that I clearly understand more about networks than
Soooog believes I do (and, to twist the knife, that I apparently know
more about web publishing too).
So, given Soooog's rash promise above:
> I would be willing to bet every machine on my home LAN against yours
> that you are wrong!, ...
It seems I've just "won" myself Sooooog's home LAN. I reckon the
shipping costs of sending it all to New Zealand alone will just about
cripple Sooooog, but that will be another learning experience for him
-- don't bet the farm if you might be wrong and can't afford to lose it.
Will he actually learn anything from this?
It seems unlikely, but he might have trouble writing that newspaper
columb for a while...
> ... FYI, that web
> page belongs to a friend of mine from church and *she* allows me to use it
> when I run out of space to put my *freeware* programs up for download, and
> because my son is in here Sunday school class and she doesn't use here web
> page space she allows him to host his gamers page on here web space. ...
You realize that is almost certainly a breach of the ISP's ToS/AUP?
Now you've admitted it publicly someone might report you. If they do,
it won't be me -- much as you are a stupid git unworthy of the oxygen
you consume, I would not do that to you (not worth the effort).
> ... I have
> been learning him ...
Not remedial English, I hope!
> ... all of a few weeks how to make a web page, and I bet he
> can already create a better web page using only a text editor then you can
> if you use front page express or home site or any other web page in a can
> web page maker. ...
You know, you just may be right but then I never claimed to be able to
make "good" web pages (a rather subjective issue to judge anyway). I
simply claimed, based on incontrovertible evidence that was apparent to
anyone who cared to take the few nanosends to look, that your son seemed
to be assuming Sugien-esque qualities too. As if that was not an
ascorbic enough clim, you then came along and showed perhaps the most
extreme case of what I was referring to in your rebuttal -- I mean,
giving away your computers because you are to ignorant to understand a
simple claim made in simple English and that could be verified in a
fraction of a second of web-browsing?
> ... You see I taught him to use a plane ole text editor and to
> learn the tags to make his pages.
And you dd not think to teach him about relative tags early in the
process? Wow...
> But keep spouting your trash nick, you are the butt of many a joke
> around here, when the local pc club meets at my house. This recent one
> should have them rolling on the floor with tears in there eyes when I show
> them how you think a ISP web page is actually one of my pc's, I can hardly
> type and laugh at the same time, thanks you have given me my chuckle for the
> week.
You will show them this reply too, that shows what a moron you are in how
badly wrong you got things, won't you?
Oh -- no, you won't be able to will you, because you will have no
computers on which to do it. Tell you what -- if you have a printer,
before you pack everything up to send to me, print this out so you can
explain what a sorry-arse, fuck-wit loser you are when your buds come
around...
--
Nick FitzGerald
Sugien
"Tim the Baker" <sp...@otvcablelan.net> wrote in message
news:m41nct0ca8jdk9949...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2001 17:34:43 GMT, "Sugien" <gen...@mindless.com>
> wrote:
>
> >"Nick FitzGerald" <ni...@virus-l.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> >news:01c0bcc5$2d6ef700$0500000a@mobilenick...
> >> Has he ever tested his web site from other than his (or perhaps that
> >> is *your*) PC??
> >>
> >> What's the bet there is a directory tree named:
> >> c:\michael\!!!my webpage on that machine.
> >>
> >> Doh!
>
> > I would be willing to bet every machine on my home LAN against yours
> >that you are wrong!,
>
> Erm Sugien.....Don't be to hasty with that bet :)
>
> Source code from Frame that actually works is:
>
> <BODY BACKGROUND="36.jpg">
> <A HREF="file://C:\michael\!!!my webpage/rightside.html"
> TARGET="CONTENT">Main</a><P>
> DBZ STUFF
> <HR>
> TARGET="CONTENT">Images</A><P>
>
>
> <A HREF="file://C:\michael\!!!my webpage\rightsidepowerlevels.html"
> TARGET="CONTENT">Character Power Levels</A>
>
> <Snipped rest of code>
>
> tim
as he stated it , I will stand by it, all the files are uploaded to the ISP,
my son *may* have not changed his graphic links from when he was testing it
local; but that is an oversight and not by design, he just hasn't changed
them yet, if you go to the url
http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/michael
you will find all the same graphics, he has just not changed them yet.
better yet do a
view-source:http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/michael/index.html which will
bring up the index's html in notepad and you will see the web page *is* on
the ISP, and he just hasn't changed the graphic links yet. And after looking
it also looks like he still has some of his html pointing at the local
files; but the local files aren't there because he moved them local after he
uploaded them; but the web page it's self which a web page is actually the
index.html ***is** on a ISP which is provable with the above view-source. I
wasn't aware he hadn't changed his links but Nick also said my almost
stealth emailer was being downloaded from a local machine that was just
redirected to; but that is wrong also. the index which ****IS**** at
http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/michael is this:
<HTML>
<TITLE>Mike's Crib</TITLE>
<frameset cols="12%,*">
<frame src="leftside.html"FRAMEBORDER="0">
<frame src="rightside.html"FRAMEBORDER="0" name="CONTENT">
</frameset>
</HTML>
so you tell me is the above html which is on a ISP server is it local on one
of my computers or on the ISP's server?
Nina Irwin
wrote:
<Snip>
> I have been learning him all of a few weeks how to make a web page, and I bet he
>can already create a better web page using only a text editor then you can
>if you use front page express or home site or any other web page in a can
>web page maker. You see I taught him to use a plane ole text editor and to
>learn the tags to make his pages.
>
<Snip - Snip>
Sugien,
I sure hope you have someone editing, proofing and spell checking your
newspaper column. The above paragraph is awful.
Nina Irwin
ni...@cyber-tech-computer.com
Nick FitzGerald
> as he stated it , I will stand by it, ...
Good -- so you are agreeing you lost your own bet and will send me all
your computers. I normally wouldn't want them, but you seem keen to
give them away and I really think the world would be better place if
you didn't have access to computers or the net for a while...
> ... all the files are uploaded to the ISP,
> my son *may* have not changed his graphic links from when he was testing it
> local; but that is an oversight and not by design, he just hasn't changed
> them yet, if you go to the url
> http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/michael
> you will find all the same graphics, he has just not changed them yet.
> better yet do a
> view-source:http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/michael/index.html which will
> bring up the index's html in notepad and you will see the web page *is* on
> the ISP, and he just hasn't changed the graphic links yet. And after looking
> it also looks like he still has some of his html pointing at the local
> files; but the local files aren't there because he moved them local after he
> uploaded them; but the web page it's self which a web page is actually the
> index.html ***is** on a ISP which is provable with the above view-source.
..
That's all well-and-good, but it is **completely irrelevant** to what
I claimed. I did not say the pages weren't on the ISP's servers. I
didn't even check if they were and I don't care because that was
irrelevant to my point, which was that the pages that were on the ISP
include absolute links to the copies of the pages on Michael's
"development machine". That was all I claimed and you said I was
wrong and would bet all your computers against my claim. You even
admitted my claim was correct in the post wehre you posed the bet:
: ... but seriously he knows it won't work as it is...
which was all I was claiming.
You then confirm my claim again in the post I am responding to:
> ... I
> wasn't aware he hadn't changed his links but Nick also said my almost
> stealth emailer was being downloaded from a local machine that was just
> redirected to; but that is wrong also. ...
No -- I didn't say that. Apart from being a quite clearly absurd
claim, I cannot see how even your drug-addled monkey-brain can so
grievously misunderstand what I wrote and then repeat it so badly
misrepresented here. To save others going back to re-read what I
wrote about redirecting:
# > http://www.zoomnet.net/~quick/myprograms/almoststealthemailer.html
#
# Which redirects and d/ls a file from your son's web space at:
#
# http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/
Now -- where did I say it redirects and/or d/s from a local machine?
And, back to Soooog's most recent message:
> ... the index which ****IS**** at
> http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/michael is this:
>
> <HTML>
> <TITLE>Mike's Crib</TITLE>
> <frameset cols="12%,*">
> <frame src="leftside.html"FRAMEBORDER="0">
> <frame src="rightside.html"FRAMEBORDER="0" name="CONTENT">
>
> </frameset>
> </HTML>
>
> so you tell me is the above html which is on a ISP server is it local on one
> of my computers or on the ISP's server?
I never said it was not on the ISP's server. I said there are links
on it that are broken and indicate that your son, in typically
Sugien-esque "style" hasn't tested the site very well, but he probably
believes that the site works because he only tests from a machine that
does have local copies of the files in the "broken" links. In fact,
despite this discussion the links in the "leftside.html" frame are
*still* broken.
You've been shown to be seriously wrong again Sooooog and to have
lost your own bet, so send me your computers.
Or are you such a lame-arse ninny that you don't even stand by your
own convictions and offers? Do we have to add "doesn't pay his
dues" to all the other shortcomings you love exposing to us?
--
Nick FitzGerald
Sugien
No where did you make that claim, you are trying to rewrite it, but I have
included your entire post below just so you can't
> wrong and would bet all your computers against my claim. You even
> admitted my claim was correct in the post wehre you posed the bet:
>
> : ... but seriously he knows it won't work as it is...
>
> which was all I was claiming.
nope
>
> You then confirm my claim again in the post I am responding to:
>
> > ... I
> > wasn't aware he hadn't changed his links but Nick also said my almost
> > stealth emailer was being downloaded from a local machine that was just
> > redirected to; but that is wrong also. ...
>
> No -- I didn't say that. Apart from being a quite clearly absurd
well seeing as how you were trying to say my sons page was on a local pc and
that my download was from that pc?
> claim, I cannot see how even your drug-addled monkey-brain can so
> grievously misunderstand what I wrote and then repeat it so badly
> misrepresented here. To save others going back to re-read what I
> wrote about redirecting:
>
> # > http://www.zoomnet.net/~quick/myprograms/almoststealthemailer.html
> #
> # Which redirects and d/ls a file from your son's web space at:
> #
> # http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/
>
> Now -- where did I say it redirects and/or d/s from a local machine?
>
> And, back to Soooog's most recent message:
>
> > ... the index which ****IS**** at
> > http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/michael is this:
> >
> > <HTML>
> > <TITLE>Mike's Crib</TITLE>
> > <frameset cols="12%,*">
> > <frame src="leftside.html"FRAMEBORDER="0">
> > <frame src="rightside.html"FRAMEBORDER="0" name="CONTENT">
> >
> > </frameset>
> > </HTML>
> >
> > so you tell me is the above html which is on a ISP server is it local on
one
> > of my computers or on the ISP's server?
>
> I never said it was not on the ISP's server. I said there are links
you never mentioned any links what so ever here you are clearly trying to
add in stuff that was not posted to try and prop up your end.
> on it that are broken and indicate that your son, in typically
> Sugien-esque "style" hasn't tested the site very well, but he probably
> believes that the site works because he only tests from a machine that
> does have local copies of the files in the "broken" links. In fact,
> despite this discussion the links in the "leftside.html" frame are
> *still* broken.
>
> You've been shown to be seriously wrong again Sooooog and to have
> lost your own bet, so send me your computers.
you have proven nothing and in fact (see below) I will expect either your
admiting you are wrong or your computers to be sent to me.
>
> Or are you such a lame-arse ninny that you don't even stand by your
> own convictions and offers? Do we have to add "doesn't pay his
> dues" to all the other shortcomings you love exposing to us?
Oh believe me if you could prove me wrong I would send them; but you have
not and never can becaue it just isn't true. read below where I quote *all*
of what you said and break it down for your tiny mind to follow.
>
>
> --
> Nick FitzGerald
lets take this assaning claim of your step by step you said:
#######
"Nick FitzGerald" <ni...@virus-l.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:01c0bcc5$2d6ef700$0500000a@mobilenick...
> Sugien <gen...@mindless.com> wrote:
>
> > http://www.zoomnet.net/~quick/myprograms/almoststealthemailer.html
>
> Which redirects and d/ls a file from your son's web space at:
>
> http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/
>
> Michael apparently takes after his father, eh Soooog?
>
> Has he ever tested his web site from other than his (or perhaps that
> is *your*) PC??
>
> What's the bet there is a directory tree named:
>
> c:\michael\!!!my webpage
>
> on that machine.
>
> Doh!
>
>
> --
> Nick FitzGerald
############
your first error you stated
####> > http://www.zoomnet.net/~quick/myprograms/almoststealthemailer.html
>
> Which redirects and d/ls a file from your son's web space at:
>
> http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/
##############
Wrong error number 1: that is not my son's web page space but rather one of
his Sunday school teachers that allows my son and I to use part of her web
page space because she does not.
Error number 2
######> Michael apparently takes after his father, eh Soooog?#######
Wrong; because he really doesn't because he is more of a gamer than an
experimenter, I on the other hand have never even played a playstation game
which he spends quite a bit of time on.
error number 3
#####> Has he ever tested his web site from other than his (or perhaps that
> is *your*) PC??
#######
Well the first part is a question but the second part is asking "or perhaps
that is *your*)PC?? thats the error because there is not now nor has there
ever been a folder named c:\michael\!!!my webpage on my PC; and because of
the last line of the above where you ask ##or perhaps that is *your*)PC??##
I could only assume from that , that the next line
###> What's the bet there is a directory tree named:
>
> c:\michael\!!!my webpage
>
> on that machine.############
you were asking #on that machine# a directory tree named c:\michael\!!!my
webpage was on my pc; because of you askeing that question right after
asking if it was my PC, which there isn't. which would be the final Error,
number 4
So you see you snide know it all know nothing you are just a big bag
of hot air that can't admit when you are wrong in fact I think it is
pathologically impossible for you to admit to being wrong when you are. So
now that it is *PROVEN* you are wrong when should I expect your pc's at my
post office box?; but I will tell you what seeing as how I am an honorable
man opposed to your not being because you will never admit to being wrong
and seeing as how my bet said "I would be willing" not that "I was willing"
to bet if you just admit to being wrong, you can keep your pc's; because I
wouldn't want something a slimy asshole like you had been around, your body
odor probably permeates them and they are probably rank and have to have the
body oils that have permutated them regularly washed off with denatured
alcohol to prevent the system boards from over heating.
I can take solace at least in the fact that most probably just about
every one(except for a few of your die hard cronies that would stand up and
say you were right even if I had you on film doing something they would
still say it wasn't you and that you probably had a twin you didn't know of)
that has read this exchange knows you are in the wrong and with your not
being able to admit to being wrong, I have been justified in what I said
about it probably being pathologically imposable for you to admit to being
wrong.
Finally, you must have a pathological fixation on me for some unknown
reason, because it seems you follow around and any where I post you feel
forced to make some asinine comment about it no mater what the subject. I
of course know you have every right to do so; because if nothing else Usenet
*is* still a free public forum where people can come and put forth there
ideas and there ascertains or expound on any subject or situation they want
without fear of physical reprisal or without fear of being sent to jail for
just spouting some words aimed at an individual or government.
and one final proof there is not a folder on his pc named c:\michael\!!!my
webpage either ; because before he uploaded the page he moved the folder
!!!my webpage into a folder named "ForUpload" but there is no way for me to
prove that unless I allow file shareing on that pc; which I won't because of
security concerns. so you see nick I should be expecting your pc's any day
now?
and just so there is no confusement here is your entire post and my reply
and bet.
"Nick FitzGerald" <ni...@virus-l.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:01c0bcc5$2d6ef700$0500000a@mobilenick...
> Sugien <gen...@mindless.com> wrote:
>
> > http://www.zoomnet.net/~quick/myprograms/almoststealthemailer.html
>
> Which redirects and d/ls a file from your son's web space at:
>
> http://www.zoomnet.net/~moore23/
>
> Michael apparently takes after his father, eh Soooog?
>
> Has he ever tested his web site from other than his (or perhaps that
> is *your*) PC??
>
> What's the bet there is a directory tree named:
>
> c:\michael\!!!my webpage
>
> on that machine.
>
> Doh!
>
>
> --
> Nick FitzGerald
I would be willing to bet every machine on my home LAN against yours
that you are wrong!, everything you have said above is wrong! I use to
think you had a little knowledge about networks but now I know you sure
don't I can see you are a real numb nuts when it comes to the internet,
come on if you think an account on a ISP is a home computer? FYI, that web
page belongs to a friend of mine from church and *she* allows me to use it
when I run out of space to put my *freeware* programs up for download, and
because my son is in here Sunday school class and she doesn't use here web
page space she allows him to host his gamers page on here web space. I have
been learning him all of a few weeks how to make a web page, and I bet he
can already create a better web page using only a text editor then you can
if you use front page express or home site or any other web page in a can
web page maker. You see I taught him to use a plane ole text editor and to
learn the tags to make his pages.
But keep spouting your trash nick, you are the butt of many a joke
around here, when the local pc club meets at my house. This recent one
should have them rolling on the floor with tears in there eyes when I show
them how you think a ISP web page is actually one of my pc's, I can hardly
type and laugh at the same time, thanks you have given me my chuckle for the
week.
btw, I can tell from your comments that you have been browsing around in his
folder at zoonment, you might want to be careful you never know what you
might open up, lol; but seriously he knows it won't work as it is, that is
why a link to it is *not* posted anywhere he still has to make all the links
relative.