On 6/30/2017 12:10 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> Tang Huyen
>> This is beyond me, but some people talk effusively
>> of the perfection of the imperfect. It presumably
>> takes a certain mindset/attitude to see it, but to
>> them, it is as obvious as our everyday reality is to
>> us. In the Heart scripture, it says: Form is emptiness.
>> To these people, the imperfect is perfect, just as it is,
>> right at the surface, boom and that's it. "I love you
>> just the way you are".
> Because that is the perception those of us who are sufficiently
> blessed get in meditation. Everything is just right, just the way it
> was intended, just the way it is. That is the perception. That does
> not mean that the perception is accurate.
Which is why I have said for a long time that mystical
perception, at a minimum of peace, accord, harmony,
is purely subjective and strictly sentimental, and that it
serves as consolation prize, for the human condition,
because nothing has changed out there, objectively,
and such good feeling (eupatheia) cannot be connected
with anything objective out there.
It is an oasis of heaven, on earth, temporary and
episodic, but not anything real, though it radiates to
others the possibility of replicating it, or at least the
good feeling of empathy with it, vicarious or otherwise.
In a sense, it is a conjunction or continuation with the
Divine Mind, as Averroes says, but he uses it in an
intellectual sense, and here I use it in an affective
sense. A temporary refuge, in relief from the travail of
the world, and nothing more. Mother Nature affords
some of us some kind of safety valve, with some
radiation (the halo effect), so that she can redeem
herself to our eyes.
Mental culture serves to click in with this potential,
almost at will, as self-induced, but the paradox is that
the less self or "I" is there, the more likely this clicking
will occur. The more we vacate ourselves, the more
likely God will come to bestow grace on us, for free.
This God is impersonal and shorn of mark, sign,
particularity, and of any ego, self or "I", even more of
any Super-I. The paradoxes in Daoism and
Buddhism are to describe this God, and the Way to
get to him, all in vain, which is why Daoism and
Buddhism bend themselves backward to deny
themselves. The less trace the better, which is just
the Way. All is well that ends well.
Tang Huyen