The True Origins of the Prosperity Gospel AKA Word of Faith

[servant]

If one looks closely enough the individual who has invented modern
rligious theories can be found.

Here are the examples of the "prosperity gospel"
and the "word faith" theories and the individuals who invented them.

As always, why accept these new theories invented 2000 years after the
fact?

Why are these new theories excluded from the warnings of false teachers to
come?

'The True Origins of the Prosperity Gospel AKA Word of Faith Theology'

http://apprising.org/2014/08/30/true-origins-of-the-prosperity-gospel-aka-word-faith-theology/

[dolf]

Cease you blasphemous and false statements about 2,000 years you godless
fascist piece of satanic scum.

As you are in breach of my digital millennium copyright act (USA)
entitlements and rights.

THE THINGS OF GOD WERE SO CLEARLY DISDAINED BY THE WORLD.

YOUTUBE: “Battle Hymn of the Republic (Joan Baez)”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHforl6vnco

It is a theoretical mathematical noumenon which is an essential logic /
language / knowledge pragmatics / appraisal component for all human sapient
activity deploying Artificial Intelligence (ie. it provides a hierarchical
structure as framework for rules based action) applications in much the
same way that the Dewey Decimal System is to a library of books.

If you have something to say then provide the evidence of facts or reasoned
argument such as my theoretical mathematical paradigm is derived from such
concepts conveyed within Immanuel Kant’s thesis: The Critique of Pure
Reason (1781; second edition 1787)--if not then keep silent.

- http://www.grapple369.com?time:5.11

I QUOTE: "In the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
phenomena and noumena, Kant emphasizes that because the categories must
always be applied to data provided by sensibility in order to provide
cognition, and because the data of sensibility are structured by the
transcenden­tally ideal forms of intuition, the categories give us
knowledge only of things as they appear with sensibility ("phenomena,"
literally "that which appears"). Although through pure understanding (nous
in Greek) we may think of objects independently of their being given in
sensibil­ity, we can never cognize them as such non-sensible entities
("noumena," literally "that which is thought" as a subject of some 112
mentions). The meaning of Kant's use of the term "phenomena" is
self-evident, but the meaning of "noumena" is not, since it literally means
not "things as they are in­ dependently of appearing to us" but something
more like "things as they are understood by pure thought." Yet Kant appears
to deny that the human understanding can comprehend things in the latter
way."

- http://strangebeautiful.com/other-texts/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf

*THUS* *I* *AM* *PROFFERING* *AN* *INFORMED* *AND* *REASONED* *OPINION*
*AS* *THAT* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL* *KANT* *STATES* *IS* *AN* *IMPOSSIBILITY*
*FOR* *A* *HUMAN* *BEING* *TO* *ACCOMPLISH* *BY* *TRANSCENDENT*
*SAPIENTIAL* *THOUGHT* *AND* *CAPABLY* *DEMONSTRATE* *IT’S* *TEMPORAL*
*CONGRUENCE* *AS* *COHERENCE* *BY* *A* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL*
*NOUMENON* *AS* *AN* *INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL* *KANT*
*HIMSELF* *CALLS* *NOUMENA* *AS* *THE* *PROOF* *OF* *A* *VALID* *AND*
*RATIONAL* *CONCEPT* *ATTAINED* *BY* *PURE* *THOUGHT* *BUT* *MY*
*ANTAGONIST’S* *OPINIONS* *ARE* *ONLY* *A* *SELF*-*INFATUATION* *WITH*
*DELUSION* *AND* *MORE* *PROPERLY* *UNDERSTOOD* *IN* *TERMS* *OF*
*PSYCHOSIS*.



Like Duke Earl (Fascist Catholic) Weber you have neither rationality nor
reason to his soggy biscuit faith as TERNIO ANAGRAM witches-brew as the
SATANIC BABYLONIAN harlotry of Pythagorean binomial noumenon which is
intrinsic to Latin as lingua franca of hateful spells, vile-some spit and
tombstone curses.

He cannot claim thereby a Christian identity and must cease his blasphemous
treasonable lies to the truth as the Intellectual TETRAD conveyed by the
fours days of GENESIS-nature in [Genesis 1:1-19 (KJV)]

--


#5 / #6: Say NO to anonymous fascist propaganda every time.

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE.

- http://www.grapple369.com

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS."