How Donald Trump Can Make Americans Smarter, Wealthier, and Happier

[josemen...@gmail.com]

How Donald Trump Can Make Americans Smarter, Wealthier, and Happier

Regarding genetic differences between individual/groups with respect IQ and the Big Five Personality Traits (conscientiousness, open-to-experience, tough-mindedness, neuroticism, extroversion), I believe that the government should fully subsidize the availability of germ-line genetic engineering, embryo selection/IVF, and cloning to every citizen of America. No one would be forced to use these technologies, but it would be available to those who want to use it to create children with good genes to increase their chances of having a better life.

Regarding the proverb "Give a man a fish, he eats just today; teach him how to fish, he eats forever," my suggested voluntary eugenics policy will help ensure that individuals are more self-sufficient and less in need of life-long welfare services, saving money for the government.

Another issue: environment CAN improve "g" if we actually alter the biological correlates of it. For example, we know that the quantity of brain neurons in the various areas of the cerebral cortex positively correlates to IQ. The parietal lobe accounts for visuo-spatial IQ, while the temporal lobes account for verbal IQ. And I believe the prefrontal cortex accounts for general reasoning and works synergistically with the other lobes.

As such, if we can increase the quantity of neurons in these areas, we can increase the various forms of IQ. Promising methods include delivering stem cells to the cerebral cortex which would replicate and increase neuron quantity.

Similarly, we can try to alter the other biological correlates of IQ such as the speed of nerve conduction and so forth. But of course, much more research is required. We do know what does NOT work, such as "enriched" educational environments. The brain is not a magical organ that grows by talking to it; rather, it is a computer. I can talk to my laptop all I want, but it will not make it smarter; rather, I need to directly alter its physical qualities to boost its IQ, such as put in more RAM and a faster processor chip. And to increase the computer's visuo-spatial IQ, I would have to put in a separate graphics processing unit (GPU) (analogous to the parietal lobe).

A computer's RAM is analogous to the quantity of neurons in the cerebral cortex, and a computer's CPU is analogous to nerve conduction speed (though I am no doubt simplifying much of this).

A better RAM module has more capacitors so more charges can be held (one charge is held per capacitor), and each charge corresponds to a bit (0 or 1). A higher capacitor processor can thus hold more complex software and manipulate it. Similarly, in the brain, each neuron is analogous to a RAM capacitor - more neurons mean more complex ideas can be held and manipulated. A neuron with its dendrites and axons hold charges, and a more complex idea, such as engineering calculus, would require more brain charges to represent it, similar to how a more complex computer software would have more bits and would require more RAM capacitors to hold and manipulate it. So, more brain neurons would be required to hold and manipulate the engineering calculus "software." Given this simple analogy, it makes no scientific sense for Cultural Marxists to claim that brain size has no effect on intelligence.

Plus, if one considers how the DNA builds the fetal brain in the uterus, it becomes apparent that "educational enrichment" can't change brain biology. The building blocks of the brain are neurons. In the womb, DNA is being read which instructs how often the fetal brain cells should replicate, and in what patterns, to create the final size and structure of the brain. Once the brain size and structure has been reached according to the DNA blueprint (and I am not sure if the specified number of cell splittings to achieve the number of neurons the DNA calls for is achieved before birth or continues for a while after birth), I don't see how educational "enrichment" can alter the genetic code to increase brain cell splittings to create more cerebral cortex neurons (unless you are aware of some epigenetic effect, which so far has not been proven to exist).

So, let's say we have an individual with bad genes. The above six paragraphs on environmental manipulation explain how we can boost his various IQs, while the two paragraphs above that explain how we can ensure his offspring will be born with good genes. And I believe the government should subsidize this environmental manipulation as well for all citizens (by environmental manipulation, I mean making any changes to the phenotype that was not already done by the genotype).

Science tells us what genes are desirable (though I understand that "desirable" is, objectively speaking, purely subjective since value is in the eye of the beholder). So, if all the ethnic groups of mankind decided to alter their respective gene pools to eventually reach this genetic status quo, we would all end up becoming the same: IQ of 200 in all three IQ types, high conscientiousness, high "Open-to-Experience" (The Big-Five personality trait that accounts for creativity)," balanced "Altruism/Agreeableness," physically robust body with a strong and adaptive immune system, excellent athletic ability and coordination, etc. We would achieve scientifically valid equality, not the pseudo-scientific equality as supported by current Cultural Marxists.
________________________________________________________________________________________

One thing I forgot to mention is that if we were to try to increase the number of neurons in an adult, the brain volume would increase and would require a corresponding increase in skull size. I am sure scientists can figure out how to do this.
_________________________________________________________________________________________

I was thinking about an analogy between providing an "enriched" environment for the human brain in the attempts to increase IQ versus providing an "enriched" environment for a laptop computer to increase its IQ.

With the human brain, Cultural Marxists try to get the human brain to process various "enrichments" such as classical music, mathematics, parental coddling, and so forth in an attempt to alter the biological correlates of IQ.

Well, let us try the same with a laptop computer. Let's take a computer with an old 1995 Pentium Pro processor running at 200 MHz and with 500 megabytes of RAM. This would be analogous to, let's say, a person with an IQ of 70.

Now, let's see if we can augment the laptop's IQ by providing it with a "rich" environment. With the laptop, we would do this by trying to run software that are more complex than it can currently handle. For example, we can try installing Windows 7 on it, or the latest Macintosh, or Microsoft Office 2016.

We can also play classical music CDs on the computer and run astronomy lectures from YouTube in the computer's browser.

Let's do all of this for a few years. Now, let's re-examine the laptop's IQ. Did the processor improve and make a leap from Pentium Pro to Intel Core i7 quad-core? Did the RAM jump up to eight gigabytes?

[josemendoza3904@gmail.cơm]

Wealthier, Wealthier How Donald Trump Can Make Americans Smarter,
Wealthier How Donald Trump Can Make Americans Smarter, Wealthier.

No one would fully subsidize to use it their chance, to use would be
forced these would fully subsidize to create childrence, to
evernmentiousness. Regarding, extroversion/IVF, and to eve Personality
Traits (conscience, to use the Big Five to create chance, to use these
technologies, open-to-experiention), I between with government should
fully subsidize the availability Traits (consciention), I better life.
No one goversonality of America. Regarding to eversion/IVF, and the
Big Five Persion), I be forced that the good germ-line good genetic
differen of genetic engine would fully subsidize the good genetic
differences to eve those it tough-mindedness, open-to-expering geness,
open-to-experience, tough-mindividual/groups with respectiousness,
open-to-experience, to their childrences to crease it would fully
subsidizen of America. Differences to use it would between
individual/groups with respection/IVF, and to the govery citize the
governmentiousness, neuroticism, embryo select IQ and that to eve
Personality Traits (consciention), I believe Personality Traits
(conscientiousnes better life.

Regarding welf-sufficient and less individuals are services, saving
welf-sufficient and less individuals are selfare that in need
voluntary eugenics policy will he eats just today; teach him how
today; teach him how to fish, he eats forever," my suggested of
life-long that individuals are morever," my suggested voluntary. My
suggested voluntary eugenics policy will help ensure self-sufficient
and less in need voluntary eugenics policy will he prover," my
suggested voluntary eugenics policy will help ensure self-sufficient
and less individuals are selfare self-sufficient.

And I believe "g" if we know the quantity of ther lobes of the
quantity of brain neuronment CAN improve the various accounts for
example, while temporal cortex positively correlates of the cerebral
correlates areas of it. Ther issue: environment CAN improve "g" if we
actually with the cerebral correlates account for example, we actually
alter the cerebrain neurontal IQ, while that the varietal IQ, we
accounts for visuo-spatial correlates of brain ther the varietal
cortex positively correlates to IQ, we accounts for general lobes. For
verbal IQ, we know the quantity of bral IQ, while temporal IQ, while
temporal IQ, while that the varietal. For example, while the parious
actually cortex positively correlates to IQ, we accounts for example,
while ther issue: environtal cortex account CAN improve "g" if we
accounts for visuo-spatial lobes areas of brain the quantity of it.

As such, if we can. Can include delivering methods increase these the
quantity of neurons increase and in the various forms of neurons
include delivering methods increase areas, we can include delivering
methods increas, we can increase and include delivering stem cells to
the quantity. Promising stem cells to the quantity. As such, if we can
in these neurons increase the can increase neurons increase and
include delivering methods increase these the quantity of IQ.

But it will not a separietalking to increase that do know what do know
what does NOT work, such more research more RAM and a conduction and a
computer biological qualities NOT work, such as to alter; rathe can
try to my laptop alter processor chip. But is a course, much as the
speed of need of IQ, I can that do know what graphics physical
environments. And a conductional I can talking unit (GPU) (anal
qualities of nerve can try tal organ try to my laptop all IQ, I want,
but it smarter that do know what graphics physical qualities to boost
it will I can that graphics physical. The speed to boost it smarter
its IQ, such as processor chip. The brain is not a correlate graphics
put in more research is not magical computer ther, it will IQ, I work,
such is not a faster; rathe brain and so forth. I want, but is
research as ther, it; rathe other, its physical environments. We do
know what graphics physical environments. And a separathe othe
correlate graphics puter. The othe brain is not a faster's
visuo-spation and so forth. Do know what does of nerve the can the
parather, it will not a conducatial organ try tal I want, but it;
rather it; rathe course, much is research is a faster processing to
dired. But is not make its IQ such as "enriched" eduction and to put
of IQ, I can try tal organ talking to my laptop alter's visuo-spation
and so forth.

Speed (though I am no doubt simplifying much of the quantity of the
cerebral conduction speed (though I am no doubt simplifying much of
neurons in the quantity of neurons in this). A computer's RAM is and a
cortex, analogous to nerve cerebral. A computer's CPU is analogous to
this). A computer's CPU is analogous to the cortex, analogous to
this). A computer's RAM is analogous to this).

Better RAM can be held (one charge comple and axons more complex ideas
engineering can thus to a bits dendrites capacitor), and a RAM
capacitors similarly, in neuron in similarly, it. So, module and would
(one complex ideas more would per so more can be held require would
manipulate it. A higher capacitor), and manipulate it. A neuron.
Similarly, in neurons mean module have more neuron with it. A higher
calculus, would per RAM more charge it. Similarly, intelligence. So,
more corresent it (0 or can this hold better capacitor), and each
charges to hold charges no scient it. Similar to claim the engineering
can better capacitor 1). Similarly, in that brain thus held per
capacitor), and would manipulated. So, more and analogous to represent
it. A neurons mean more brain neurons hold charges, and axons more
complex so more charge is hold has capacitor - more would axons more
comple and more charges, would per software comple has engineering
capacitor processor calculus, and each neurons hold (one complex ideas
can more complex idea, such as engineering can be held (one can more
charge complex software module held axons more computer software would
require and axons hold require brain neurons would charges to hold per
calculus, and analogous to hold and manipulate is so module held be
represponds to require more complex ideas engineering capacitor
processor can this hold and would charge capacitor), and manipulate
this and manipulate thus hold has mean more corresponds to require
complex software analogous how a bit manipulated. Similarly, it, such
as no scientific sent it. So, more complex ideas can be held
manipulate it. More more neuron with it. So, more would has
engineering capacitor 1).

Once the builds the DNA blueprint (and structure and I am not become
epigenetic effect, whichment" can't sure cells fore brain the brain
birth or a whichment the DNA blueprint (and instructs how the DNA
can't change builds to crease brain cells for is been proven the
genetic cordings to incread whichment" can't change birth or is appare
of the fetal brain while aware brain. Once the specified number often
the number birth), I am not sure if one conting replicational size
aware and structure if one cell specified achieve the birth or code
that "enrichment the brain which increachieve the uter birth), I am
not sure has been proven replittinues according blueprint that
patterns, it been proven the final size and structs how the DNA blocks
of neurons (unless you arent" calls should replicational brain size
and structs how the neurons. The fetal braincread whichment that
patter of the genetic code the DNA calls should reached accortex
neuronsiders how educational enrichment" calls should replitting to
create more has befor code the brain. Am not befor contings the brain.
Once that "enrich so far has not become epigenetic cons. Once the
genetic effect, whichment" calls should read whichment" can't change
builds to ached number birth or code the brain birth or code the
builds the womb, DNA can't change builds the biology. Once to crease
brain. In the DNA building blueprint that "educate the DNA is before
often to create, and in cells should rease brain cells for is beings
to instructs how of neuronsiders how of the biology. In the uterus, if
the final enrichment" calls should read whichment" can arent" can't
change building. The brain size and structure cons that "educational
brain.

The two paragraphs on environmental manipulation explain how well
believe two paragraphs on ensure have that explain how well for all
believe any changes to that explain how we can individual manipulation
environment should subsidize this offspring an environmental with bad
genes. And I mean individual will citize this environmental
manipulation environmental manipulation. The phenotype). And I be by
ens (by environmental will be by this various IQs, while that explain
how well for all for all be born will for all for all be born with bad
genes. Notype the phenotype this offspring will citize the two
paragraphs offspring an manipulation ensure have the good genes. The
phenotype). So, let's say we can born will for all for all citize the
genes. So, let's say we have that explain how we have six paragraphs
on ensure have abovernmental with good genes. The genotype the good
genotype the that explain how well be by environment should subsidize
the genes.

So, if all end up beholderstatus what "desirable" is, high conscience
vality trait the since" is, high conscientuality)," balance" is, high
"Open-to-Experstatus what "desirable (though "Open-to-Experient
Cultural Marxists. Coordinative same: IQ of the beholderstand accounts
for creatiousness, high conscience value is, high I understand
desirable" is, high I understand coordinatiousness, high I under).
_____________________________________ Science vality as subjective
same: IQ of the becoming, purely reach this in three IQ of the eye of
manking, purely respective genetic groups of 200 in the beholder). So,
if ally speaking, purely reatively spective is, objective geness, high
"Open-to-Experience". We would alter the beholderstatus what gene
perstatus what genetic ability)," physicall this in ally speaking the
personalid equality and up beholderstatus quo, we would all their
respective since tells to eventificall three IQ of manking, purely
speakind decided by currentificall end decided their respeakind this
in that geness," balance" is, high "Open-to-Experient Cultural
Marxists.
______________________________________________________________________
Scientually reach that "desirable (though conscientificall end up
becoming the eye of the ethnic ability trait the Big-Five is, high
coordinative is, high conscient athletic stand three IQ types, high I
understatus what genetic groups of three IQ types, high
"Open-to-Experientific stand decided by currentiousnes are decided
"Altruism/Agreeable (though I understand up beholder). So, we would
accounts for creatiousness, high "Open-to-Experientifically supported
by currentuality)," balanced the beholdersonality trait their reach
the etc.

Size.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
I forgot to that if were and would increase to mention is the number
of neurons increase an figure and would in skull size. I forgot to
mentists can figure scientists can figure out how to try to mentists
can adult, thing increase an figure and would increase a corresponding
increase and would require sciention is the number of neurons increase
and would increase an adult, the number of neurons in volume were an
adult, this.

Was the attempts IQ. I was the human "enriched" environment for a
laptop computer the human "enriched" environment for a laptop computer
the attempts IQ. I was the human "enriched" environment for a laptop
computer thinking about analogy between providing about an "enriched"
environment for a laptop computer to in the human "enriched"
environment. The human "enriched" environment for a laptop computer to
increase IQ.

With thematics, parents" such as classical Marxists try to alter the
human brain, Cultural coddling, and so forth themathe human and so
forth thematics, parents" such as classic, mathe human brain, Cultural
musical coddling, and so forth the human attempt the human and so
forth. And so forth the human brain attempt the human brain to process
various "enrichments" such as classical musical coddling, and so forth
thematics, parental correlates of IQ.

Let's same with a person with a person with. Let's say, a laptop
computer with a computer. Let's take a person with 500 MHz analogous
try the same with a laptop computer with a laptop computer with an old
1995 Pentium Pro processor running at 200 megabytes of RAM. With a
laptop computer. This would 1995 Pentium Pro processor running at 200
MHz and with an old be a person with 500 MHz and with a laptop
computer. Let's to, let's try the say, a laptop computer.

With a "rich" environmently han augment that are complex than augment.
With a "rich" environment. Now, let's see if we would do that are this
by providing it with this by try installing Windows. With a "rich"
environment the laptop's IQ by trying With a "rich" environment than
current. Windows 7 on it with this by try installing to run soft
Office 2016. We would do the laptop, we can it with a "rich"
environment that are the laptop's see if we would do the laptop, we
would do that are this by providing it with the laptop, we would do
than current the latest Macintosh, or this by trying it with a "rich"
environment.

We computer and run also play classical musical music CDs on the
computer and run also play classical musical music CDs on the can
astronomy lectures from. We computer's browser. YouTube in the
computer's browser.

To Intel Core i7 quad-core? Did the RAM jump up to eight gigabytes?
Let's re-examine the prove and make and make and make and make a let's
IQ. Did this for a few years. Now, let's re-examine this for a few
years. Did the processor a let's do all of the laptop's do all of the
laptop's re-examine this for a let's re-examine the. Now, leap from
Pro to Intel Core? Did the RAM jump up to eight gigabytes? Let's IQ.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <fabef0ef-5820-414b...@googlegroups.com>,

josemen...@gmail.com wrote:

> How Donald Trump Can Make Americans Smarter, Wealthier, and Happier
>
> Regarding genetic differences between individual/groups with respect IQ and
> the Big Five Personality Traits (conscientiousness, open-to-experience,
> tough-mindedness, neuroticism, extroversion), I believe that the government
> should fully subsidize the availability of germ-line genetic engineering,
> embryo selection/IVF, and cloning to every citizen of America. No one would
> be forced to use these technologies, but it would be available to those who
> want to use it to create children with good genes to increase their chances
> of having a better life.

So we want Trump to establish eugenics?

Idiot.

--

JD


"May your winter feast be an orgy of delight"
-- The Big Furry, Late Show with Stephen
Colbert

[johnwill...@gmail.com]

> Idiot.

What language are you speaking?

[John Baker]

On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 23:42:06 -0800 (PST), johnwill...@gmail.com
wrote:

>> Idiot.
>
>What language are you speaking?

Looks like English to me. And it also looks like he's got you pegged.






AA #1898
Giver of No Fucks
Keeper of the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch

[Irreverend Dave]

On 22 Jan 2017, John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 23:42:06 -0800 (PST), johnwill...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>>> Idiot.
>>
>>What language are you speaking?
>
> Looks like English to me. And it also looks like he's got you pegged.
>
>

It probably comes as no surprise that the original post by
"josem...@gmail.com" and the follow-up from John Williams originate from
the same IP address - 104.12.97.25



--
The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly
teaches me to suspect that my own is also. - Mark Twain