On Fri, 1 Sep 2017 22:41:28 -0400, FPP <
fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 9/1/17 9:59 PM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 21:24:53 -0700, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 8/30/2017 8:35 PM, MattB wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:51:59 -0700, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/30/2017 5:01 PM, MattB wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:36:20 -0700, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/30/2017 1:08 PM, Mattb. wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:32:01 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>> <c...@philhendrie.con>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/2017 12:22 PM, MattB wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 18:11:51 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>>> <c...@philhendrie.con>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/29/2017 12:42 PM, MattB wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 11:57:28 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <c...@philhendrie.con>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/29/2017 11:01 AM, MattB wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:13:25 -0400, FPP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/17 6:51 PM, Mattb. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 18:44:11 -0400, FPP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/17 12:59 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/2017 9:31 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <oo17jf$2r0$
2...@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <
maximus...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:oo10sh$c42$
1...@dont-email.me, FPP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
fred...@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/17 7:10 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <oo0pe3$k5s$
2...@dont-email.me>, FPP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
fred...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If he did it to obstruct justice, it sure is,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> counselor.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or couldn't you figure that out?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arpaio isn't about obstruction of justice. It's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about one bigot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protecting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another bigot and continue his abuse against the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> judiciary.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When the president tries to pressure the DOJ to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drop a pending case
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against his buddy, what is he obstructing, if not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> justice?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or when a former president tries to pressure the DOJ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to drop a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pending case
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against his wife?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The CDS is strong in this one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Normally maxipad is a complete fuckwit, but he's right
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about this one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's exactly what the Lynch-Clinton meeting in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Phoenix was.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lynch should be prosecuted for that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do let us know when meeting on a plane becomes illegal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because unless you have some other kind of proof,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're just full of shit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Last I checked, "possibility" doesn't rise to the level
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of prosecution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you and did you see the level of evidence used
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against Trump by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the MSM. Anonymous witnesses and on the say so of this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They're not "anonymous" - they're just not known to YOU.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Big difference.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then the level of evidence is basically at the level of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gossip until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can know the sources.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It isn't. The people are known to the reporters and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> known to occupy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the positions they claim.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then the reporters as long as they are liberal reporters
>>>>>>>>>>>>> become the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> judges?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Basically all I have seen is we have anonymous sources that
>>>>>>>>>>> say this
>>>>>>>>>>> and that. That isn't evidence just gossip.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It isn't gossip. When an anonymous source said that James
>>>>>>>>>> Comey wrote a
>>>>>>>>>> memo immediately after Trump improperly pressed him to drop the
>>>>>>>>>> Flynn
>>>>>>>>>> investigation, he was telling the truth: Comey wrote the memo.
>>>>>>>>>> When
>>>>>>>>>> anonymous sources said that Trump campaign staff met with
>>>>>>>>>> Russian agents
>>>>>>>>>> on multiple occasions, they were telling the truth: all those
>>>>>>>>>> meetings
>>>>>>>>>> took place and have been confirmed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's not gossip.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Russian agents? That would say they work directly for the Russian
>>>>>>>>> government.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, not necessarily, but many did.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This would have to be proven
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It has been.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has it?
>>>>
>>>> Yes. Kushner and Flynn both met with the Russian ambassador - Russian
>>>> agent by the most basic definition. Kushner met with a representative
>>>> of a state-owned Russian bank - Russian agent by definition.
>>>>
>>>> Trump campaign staff met with Russian agents. This is not in dispute.
>>>
>>> Is that alone illegal under US law?
>>
>> Meanwhile what about the actual collusion of trying to impact the
>> election between the DNC/Hillary and the Ukrainian government?
>>
>> Wonder if Rudy wants to complain about that?
>
>Go for it! Show your proof... or just run away again.
There are news articles and there are sources....by what you have said
to me that is all the evidence you need. Why want evidence outside
the MSM???
DNC was doing this for Hillary and she didn't know, ROFL
>
>Either will be an answer...