When your food is a sin against God

[JTEM]

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160476288305

Forbidden Fruit; perhaps the very thing that
caused the downfall of Adam & Eve...

[Yap Honghor]

Shit stuff....
This is the same as you are nothing from the beginning!!!

[JTEM]

Yap Honghor wrote:

> Shit stuff....

"Write what you know."
--Mark Twain





-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160506282838

[Yap Honghor]

On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 2:05:51 PM UTC+8, JTEM wrote:
> Yap Honghor wrote:
>
> > Shit stuff....
>
> "Write what you know."
> --Mark Twain
>

"Believers are all fools."
--Con Leader

[JTEM]

Ironically, narcissists like you are believed to
be harboring severe inferiority complexes. Apparently
you do it to make yourself feel better about yourself,
but because you know you're such a worthless shit
there's no end... the hole is never filled... you can
never be convinced that you have value.







-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160506282838

[Yap Honghor]

On Thursday, May 11, 2017 at 3:40:20 AM UTC+8, JTEM wrote:
> Ironically, narcissists like you are believed to
> be harboring severe inferiority complexes. Apparently
> you do it to make yourself feel better about yourself,
> but because you know you're such a worthless shit
> there's no end... the hole is never filled... you can
> never be convinced that you have value.
>

Oh, shortage of the same kind, you want me to be another narcissist like you?
Me would not want to join your kind...

[Lucifer Morningstar]

.... you need a better God.

[Yap Honghor]

On Thursday, May 11, 2017 at 9:17:27 AM UTC+8, Lucifer Morningstar wrote:
> .... you need a better God.

JTEM can easily imagine a better pixie to serve him/her!

[Cloud Hobbit]

On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 12:40:20 PM UTC-7, JTEM wrote:


JTEM speaks to the mirror.

> Ironically, narcissists like you are believed to
> be harboring severe inferiority complexes. Apparently
> you do it to make yourself feel better about yourself,
> but because you know you're such a worthless shit
> there's no end... the hole is never filled... you can
> never be convinced that you have value.
>
>

So far there is no evidence of jtem having any value other than comedic.

>
>
>
>
> -- --
>
> http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160506282838

[Tim]

On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 3:40:20 PM UTC-4, JTEM wrote:
> Ironically, narcissists like you are believed to
> be harboring severe inferiority complexes. Apparently
> you do it to make yourself feel better about yourself,
> but because you know you're such a worthless shit
> there's no end... the hole is never filled... you can
> never be convinced that you have value.

There you go yacking to the mirror again.

[JTEM]

Wow, because it isn't obvious that I
represent 99% of your life...

Talk to your shrink. Show him this
thread. Explain to him what you're
pretending is your reason for obsessing
over me this time.








-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/159887709768

[JTEM]

Cloud Hobbit wrote:

> So far

You don't even know who & what you are,
you're so clueless. Please stop pretending
you can speak to me.



-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/159887709768

[JTEM]

JTEM wrote:

> > Ironically, narcissists like you are believed to
> > be harboring severe inferiority complexes. Apparently
> > you do it to make yourself feel better about yourself,
> > but because you know you're such a worthless shit
> > there's no end... the hole is never filled... you can
> > never be convinced that you have value.

Funny how you read the above and said, "THAT'S ME! He's
talking about ME!"




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/159887709768

[Jeanne Douglas]

On 16 May 2017 05:57 AM ,JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wow, because it isn't obvious that I
> represent 99% of your life...
>
> Talk to your shrink. Show him this
> thread. Explain to him what you're
> pretending is your reason for obsessing
> over me this time.

Since there are no attributes, we can only assume that JTEM is speaking to himself.




--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post

[Jeanne Douglas]

On 16 May 2017 05:58 AM ,JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Cloud Hobbit wrote:
>
> > So far
>
> You don't even know who & what you are,
> you're so clueless. Please stop pretending
> you can speak to me.

What the fuck is that supposed to mean.

Who and what is C.H.?


And knock off the idiotic narcissism.

[He Kicked Their Jewish Butts Out Of The Land]

On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 3:40:20 PM UTC-4, JTEM wrote:

> Ironically, narcissists like you are believed to
> be harboring severe inferiority complexes. Apparently
> you do it to make yourself feel better about yourself,
> but because you know you're such a worthless shit
> there's no end... the hole is never filled... you can
> never be convinced that you have value.
>
>
>

:-)

>
>
>
>
> -- --
>
> http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160506282838

[Kurt Nicklas]

"If there were no God, there would be no Atheists."
- GK Chesterton

[JTEM]

"You didn't tell me which sock puppet
you're talking to so..."





-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160732505108

[Kevrob]

On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 3:37:14 PM UTC-4, Kurt Nicklas wrote:

> "If there were no God, there would be no Atheists."
> - GK Chesterton

If there were no ghodz - a pretty safe premise - AND there were
no people pretending there were one or more, or actually convinced
there were due to mental illness, hallucination from being drugged
or poisoned or attaining an altered state through fasting, sleep
deprivation, self-hypnosis (monotonous chanting can do that,)
there would still be realists who did not buy the woo-woo.

In our universe we call them atheists and/or skeptics.

Kevin R

[Kurt Nicklas]

“There are arguments for atheism, and they do not depend, and never did depend, upon science. They are arguable enough, as far as they go, upon a general survey of life; only it happens to be a superficial survey of life.”
- GK Chesterton

[Kevrob]

On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 6:36:41 PM UTC-4, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 5:14:23 PM UTC-4, Kevrob wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 3:37:14 PM UTC-4, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
> >
> > > "If there were no God, there would be no Atheists."
> > > - GK Chesterton
> >
> > If there were no ghodz - a pretty safe premise - AND there were
> > no people pretending there were one or more, or actually convinced
> > there were due to mental illness, hallucination from being drugged
> > or poisoned or attaining an altered state through fasting, sleep
> > deprivation, self-hypnosis (monotonous chanting can do that,)
> > there would still be realists who did not buy the woo-woo.
> >
> > In our universe we call them atheists and/or skeptics.
>
> “There are arguments for atheism, and they do not depend, and never did
depend, upon science.

Some do, some don't. Chesterton was a high church Anglican turned
Catholic, not some mouth-breathing US fundie who believes every
word of his KJV, just as Jehovah wrote it in deliberately archaic
17th century English.

GKC fell for some other whoppers, notably anti-semitism and
Distributism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributism

> They are arguable enough, as far as they go, upon a general survey of life; only it happens to be a superficial survey of life.”
> - GK Chesterton

Chesterton trained as an artist. When he moved away from
aesthetics he caught a bad case of Dunning-Kruger.

Kevin R

[Jeanne Douglas]

Well, duh!

[Kurt Nicklas]

On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 5:50:35 AM UTC-4, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> On 16 May 2017 12:37 PM ,Kurt Nicklas <kurtn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 6:31:42 AM UTC-4, Yap Honghor wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 2:05:51 PM UTC+8, JTEM wrote:
> > > > Yap Honghor wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Shit stuff....
> > > >
> > > > "Write what you know."
> > > > --Mark Twain
> > > >
> > > "Believers are all fools."
> > > --Con Leader
> >
> > "If there were no God, there would be no Atheists."
> > - GK Chesterton
>
>
> Well, duh!

(1) If God does not exist, atheists do not exist.
(2) Atheists do exist.
(3) Therefore God exists.

IC | XC
-------
NI | KA

[!! Atheist ------------------------------]

Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>
> (1) If God does not exist, atheists do not exist.
> (2) Atheists do exist.
> (3) Therefore God exists.

*I* believe that you really believe that is "proof". LOL

[Jeanne Douglas]

Wow, that was stupid.

[%]

to a person prone to unacceptance i bet it was

[Kurt Nicklas]

Demonstrate that it isn't a proof. You can't do it, can you?

Can you point out the problem?

[Robert Carnegie]

The first statement is untrue. The gods are not
required for there to be atheists.

[Tim]

LOL! Typical theist "logic".

[Tim]

"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:31902231-b6e3-47e0...@googlegroups.com...

Easily, there is no evidence of any gods, but there is evidence that
atheists exist. And there is no causal connection that can be shown to exist
between the supposed existence of gods and the existence of atheists, other
than the fact that if gods do exist they are yet to show themselves in a way
that would convince atheists otherwise.

Your pathetic attempt at an argument amounts to saying: If I like chocolate,
then a green traffic light means a driver may proceed. I do like chocolate,
ergo green means go.

Stick to going down on your knees and blabbing to your imaginary sky pixie.
Leave logic and thinking to the adults, you silly kunt.

[Kurt Nicklas]

The original Chesterton quote - which "Atheist" has deleted - is taken out of context. In his article, from which the quote is taken, he had his own definition for atheism.

Using the most common definition for the word, you're right.

[Tim]

"Tim" <a...@que.com> wrote in message news:ofia8j$1tt8$1...@gioia.aioe.org...

Furthermore, the form of your argument is an example of affirming the
consequent. That's a logical fallacy. Not that you have a clue what a
logical fallacy is.

[Kurt Nicklas]

Dim, gets the booby prize.

[Jeanne Douglas]

Thanks for calling me sane and rational.

[Tim]

Silly kunt fails basic logic.

[!! Atheist ------------------------------]

I'd bet that "Kurt" the jackass *still* doesn't know what is wrong with his "proof". LOL

[Yap Honghor]

On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 8:51:50 PM UTC+8, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 5:50:35 AM UTC-4, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> > On 16 May 2017 12:37 PM ,Kurt Nicklas <kurtn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 6:31:42 AM UTC-4, Yap Honghor wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 2:05:51 PM UTC+8, JTEM wrote:
> > > > > Yap Honghor wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Shit stuff....
> > > > >
> > > > > "Write what you know."
> > > > > --Mark Twain
> > > > >
> > > > "Believers are all fools."
> > > > --Con Leader
> > >
> > > "If there were no God, there would be no Atheists."
> > > - GK Chesterton
> >
> >
> > Well, duh!
>
> (1) If God does not exist, atheists do not exist.

And since atheists exist, therefore god does not exist!!!!

> (2) Atheists do exist.

Of course!

> (3) Therefore God exists.

Illogical sentence.

[Kurt Nicklas]

You're an idiot.

'Nuff said

[Robert Carnegie]

I prefer to treat "atheist" as "someone who
doesn't worship gods". But I don't think that
that definition requires actual gods to exist
so that I can not worship them.

If nobody had thought of worshipping gods then
we probably wouldn't need a word for not worshipping
gods, but that isn't the same as actual gods either.

[Kurt Nicklas]

Just consider the words and what they mean. Without 'theist' there would be no 'atheist'.

[Lucifer Morningstar]

.... you need a better God.

[Robert Carnegie]

What's an ist?

I think you're playing a word game that I don't
fully understand [*] - but nothing profound.
But consider this: if there weren't atheists
(non-worshippers or non-believers), there
wouldn't be a category called theist (worshipper
or believer of gods). People would be absolutely
divided by religion. The Christian theist
would have no common ground with the Muslim theist.
And where would the Jewish theist find agreement
with the Hindu theist? But in fact they share
this: they all hate atheists. They get together
in Ecumenical Councils and complain about the
atheists. Then they all go together to throw
stones at atheists' windows. The togetherness
of theism is the inadvertent gift from atheists
to theists.

[*] At the word play level: without theists,
would there be therapists?

[duke]

On Tue, 9 May 2017 07:16:35 -0700 (PDT), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160476288305
>
>Forbidden Fruit; perhaps the very thing that
>caused the downfall of Adam & Eve...

What was the forbidden fruit?

Do you think a goat herder would understand the spiritual message?.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[Kit]

On Saturday, May 20, 2017 at 1:44:45 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> On Tue, 9 May 2017 07:16:35 -0700 (PDT), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160476288305
> >
> >Forbidden Fruit; perhaps the very thing that
> >caused the downfall of Adam & Eve...
>
> What was the forbidden fruit?
>
> Do you think a goat herder would understand the spiritual message?.
>

Maybe, maybe not. You, however, are incapable of understanding anything of importance.

[JTEM]

Kevrob wrote:

> If there were no ghodz

You can't prove that atheism exists. You have
faith though.




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160473717469

[JTEM]

Intellectually dishonest, Robert Carnegie wrote:

> The first statement is untrue. The gods are not
> required for there to be atheists.

FIRST establish that there's even such a thing
as atheists. Go on, PROVE atheists exist.




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160473717469

[JTEM]

Robert Carnegie wrote:

> I prefer to treat "atheist" as "someone who
> doesn't worship gods".

Prove atheists exists.

Define "Worships."

because with your rationalization, it would seem
that plenty of people who DO believe in God would
qualify as atheists.

This is add another absurdity to the already long
list of absurdities the collective "Argues" (for
lack of a better term).




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160473717469

[Kurt Nicklas]

the prefix 'a' negates what follows it. It's in a lot of our words. Comes from Greek. Examples are 'atypical','acyclic','adogmatic'...well,you get the point. So, I'm sure you can understand that if there were no 'theist' there would be no 'athiest' since there would be no word to negate. It's not word games. It's our crazy language.

[Robert Carnegie]

On Saturday, 20 May 2017 19:43:17 UTC+1, JTEM wrote:
> Robert Carnegie wrote:
>
> > I prefer to treat "atheist" as "someone who
> > doesn't worship gods".
>
> Prove atheists exists.
>
> Define "Worships."
>
> because with your rationalization, it would seem
> that plenty of people who DO believe in God would
> qualify as atheists.
>
> This is add another absurdity to the already long
> list of absurdities the collective "Argues" (for
> lack of a better term).

Whatever worship is - I'm not doing it. That makes
me an atheist.

Actually worship isn't mysterious - it is any
effort to please a god. The simplest, most
direct, and most common act of worship is to
give the god money, but there are others.

[Robert Carnegie]

You said "If God does not exist".

In fact, theists obviously exist, but God does
not exist.

And you're wrong about the words. An atheist is
someone who performs atheism. At no point are
theists involved in this activity.

[Tim]

If there were no theists then no one would believe in gods. You want to insist there would be no atheists, fine. Notwithstanding, no one would believe in gods. So other than the one on your head, what's your point, silly kunt?

[walksalone]

Robert Carnegie <rja.ca...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:c2f2fb1b-5426-493c...@googlegroups.com:

> On Saturday, 20 May 2017 19:43:17 UTC+1, JTEM wrote:
>> Robert Carnegie wrote:

snip

>> because with your rationalization, it would seem
>> that plenty of people who DO believe in God would
>> qualify as atheists.

Unless they are a Cao Daist[sp] [all gods are one], that is
exactly the case. Atheism is the lack of belief in any god,
or, sorry lady's, goddess.

snip

walksalone who does wish some of the gods of his people were
real. But that horse does not saddle.

Ex.22:29
Thou shalt not delay to offer the first of thy ripe fruits,
and of thy liquors: the firstborn of thy sons shalt thou give
unto me.

JPS

22:27 Thou shalt not revile God, nor curse a ruler of thy
people.
22:28 Thou shalt not delay to offer of the fulness of thy
harvest, and of the outflow of thy presses. The first-born of
thy sons shalt thou give unto Me.
22:29 Likewise shalt thou do with thine oxen, and with thy
sheep; seven days it shall be with its dam; on the eighth day
thou shalt give it Me.


13:1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying:
13:2 'Sanctify unto Me all the first-born, whatsoever openeth
the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and of
beast, it is Mine.'


13:1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying:
13:2 'Sanctify unto Me all the first-born, whatsoever openeth
the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and of
beast, it is Mine.'

[Kurt Nicklas]

Putting aside the usual does/does not argument, I was focusing on the simple language aspect.

> And you're wrong about the words. An atheist is
> someone who performs atheism.

"Performs atheism"?? This is a new concept. Is it akin to performing a lobotomy?

<snickers>

> At no point are
> theists involved in this activity.

You can't be serious! LOL

[Kurt Nicklas]

I think your brain has taken time off for the weekend, Dim. You're sounding even lamer than during the work week. Makes me think even your medulla doesn't function during the holidays!

You really are quite hopeless.

[Yap Honghor]

See, when beaten flatly, theists will have nothing more to argue and then call names....how typical.

[Yap Honghor]

Ya, like you Cunt who only play with words and ignore logic and facts!!!!!!!!!!!

[Robert Carnegie]

I am as serious about this as you are.
You argue that the word "atheist" means
"not theist" and so derives its meaning
from "theist". But that's a mistake.
A dictionary defines "atheist" as
"someone who doesn't believe in gods".
An atheist is someone who does atheism.

It's difficult to define "believing" and
it's also difficult to define "gods",
so I use the approach of defining "god"
as a supernatural being who is worshipped
(which means: is encouraged to be kind to
the worshipper; that's what worship is)
and defining or rather measuring religious
"belief" by worship. Obviously, if you
believe, then you worship. If you don't
believe, then you don't worship. So that's
atheism.

If you believe in a god who is equally kind
to you whether you worship them or not -
then, what religion are you practising?
Are you sure that worship isn't going to be
a necessary part of the deal?

[Christopher A. Lee]

No.

There's nothing to do.

Any more than people do "not collecting stamps".

It's "a-(theism)", not "(athe)-ism".

Just a description saying we don't do a specific thing that people
called theists do.

[Robert Carnegie]

Well, yes, all right, we are people who don't
do theism.

I thought it was usefully more simple to say
"we are people who do atheism", to make the point
that whatever we are and aren't doing, we do not
need theists to do or not do it with, or to, or at.

I half-expected to see the argument made thst
"tbq perngrq uhzna orvatf fb tbq perngrq ngurvfgf"
but I don't want to: at that point, clearly we
are talking past each other.

[Tim]

You think! LOL! Nice try, silly cunt.

>You're sounding even lamer than during the work week. Makes me think even >your medulla doesn't function during the holidays!
>
> You really are quite hopeless.

You're just a cowardly kunt who can't face up to facts. The only point you have is on your head, you dopey theist kunt.

[duke]

On Sat, 20 May 2017 10:51:00 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:

>On Saturday, May 20, 2017 at 1:44:45 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 May 2017 07:16:35 -0700 (PDT), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160476288305
>> >
>> >Forbidden Fruit; perhaps the very thing that
>> >caused the downfall of Adam & Eve...
>>
>> What was the forbidden fruit?
>> Do you think a goat herder would understand the spiritual message?.

>Maybe, maybe not. You, however, are incapable of understanding anything of importance.

It's something you're participating in. Maybe I was in error placing you above
a goat herder. My mistake.

[Kit]

On Sunday, May 21, 2017 at 11:06:38 AM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> On Sat, 20 May 2017 10:51:00 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
>
> >On Saturday, May 20, 2017 at 1:44:45 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> >> On Tue, 9 May 2017 07:16:35 -0700 (PDT), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160476288305
> >> >
> >> >Forbidden Fruit; perhaps the very thing that
> >> >caused the downfall of Adam & Eve...
> >>
> >> What was the forbidden fruit?
> >> Do you think a goat herder would understand the spiritual message?.
>
> >Maybe, maybe not. You, however, are incapable of understanding anything of importance.
>
> It's something you're participating in. Maybe I was in error placing you above
> a goat herder. My mistake.
>

You are a mistake, in every sense of the word, duke.

[duke]

On Sun, 21 May 2017 16:07:06 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:

>On Sunday, May 21, 2017 at 11:06:38 AM UTC-4, duke wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 May 2017 10:51:00 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Saturday, May 20, 2017 at 1:44:45 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 9 May 2017 07:16:35 -0700 (PDT), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160476288305
>> >> >
>> >> >Forbidden Fruit; perhaps the very thing that
>> >> >caused the downfall of Adam & Eve...
>> >>
>> >> What was the forbidden fruit?
>> >> Do you think a goat herder would understand the spiritual message?.
>>
>> >Maybe, maybe not. You, however, are incapable of understanding anything of importance.
>>
>> It's something you're participating in. Maybe I was in error placing you above
>> a goat herder. My mistake.
>>
>
>You are a mistake, in every sense of the word, duke.

And I am still your intellectual master.

[Kit]

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 5:58:28 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> On Sun, 21 May 2017 16:07:06 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
>
> >On Sunday, May 21, 2017 at 11:06:38 AM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> >> On Sat, 20 May 2017 10:51:00 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Saturday, May 20, 2017 at 1:44:45 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 9 May 2017 07:16:35 -0700 (PDT), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160476288305
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Forbidden Fruit; perhaps the very thing that
> >> >> >caused the downfall of Adam & Eve...
> >> >>
> >> >> What was the forbidden fruit?
> >> >> Do you think a goat herder would understand the spiritual message?.
> >>
> >> >Maybe, maybe not. You, however, are incapable of understanding anything of importance.
> >>
> >> It's something you're participating in. Maybe I was in error placing you above
> >> a goat herder. My mistake.
> >>
> >
> >You are a mistake, in every sense of the word, duke.
>
> And I am still your intellectual master.
>

And which institution of higher learning did you attend?

[Davej]

On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 7:51:50 AM UTC-5, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>
> (1) If God does not exist, atheists do not exist.
> (2) Atheists do exist.
> (3) Therefore God exists.

Except it isn't your f*ck-headed YAHWEH.

[Kit]

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 5:58:28 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> On Sun, 21 May 2017 16:07:06 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
>
> >On Sunday, May 21, 2017 at 11:06:38 AM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> >> On Sat, 20 May 2017 10:51:00 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Saturday, May 20, 2017 at 1:44:45 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 9 May 2017 07:16:35 -0700 (PDT), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160476288305
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Forbidden Fruit; perhaps the very thing that
> >> >> >caused the downfall of Adam & Eve...
> >> >>
> >> >> What was the forbidden fruit?
> >> >> Do you think a goat herder would understand the spiritual message?.
> >>
> >> >Maybe, maybe not. You, however, are incapable of understanding anything of importance.
> >>
> >> It's something you're participating in. Maybe I was in error placing you above
> >> a goat herder. My mistake.
> >>
> >
> >You are a mistake, in every sense of the word, duke.
>
> And I am still your intellectual master.
>

My intellectual masters were Giancarlo Rota who taught me Mathematics at MIT, Steven Boynton who taught me Physics at Princeton, and Karl Lieberherr who taught me Computer Science at Princeton. You are a blithering idiot whose massive ignorance is exceeded only by your abject stupidity.

[Kit]

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 5:58:28 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> On Sun, 21 May 2017 16:07:06 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
>
> >On Sunday, May 21, 2017 at 11:06:38 AM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> >> On Sat, 20 May 2017 10:51:00 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Saturday, May 20, 2017 at 1:44:45 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 9 May 2017 07:16:35 -0700 (PDT), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160476288305
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Forbidden Fruit; perhaps the very thing that
> >> >> >caused the downfall of Adam & Eve...
> >> >>
> >> >> What was the forbidden fruit?
> >> >> Do you think a goat herder would understand the spiritual message?.
> >>
> >> >Maybe, maybe not. You, however, are incapable of understanding anything of importance.
> >>
> >> It's something you're participating in. Maybe I was in error placing you above
> >> a goat herder. My mistake.
> >>
> >
> >You are a mistake, in every sense of the word, duke.
>
> And I am still your intellectual master.
>

Your intellectual master was the priest who butt-fucked you in the ass, deposited his semen in your rectum, and told you that you just received the Holy Spirit. And you believed him.

[duke]

It put me well over your head.

What was the forbidden fruit?

[duke]

I learned mathematics in elementary and high school, physics in high school and
university, and engineering in university.

With computer science, you learn to program games, don't you.

[duke]

Now you're letting your unwiped ass override your mouth, aren't you.

Thanks be to God I'm not you, or in your shoes.

[Kit]

On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 1:39:49 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> On Mon, 22 May 2017 16:52:51 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
>
> >On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 5:58:28 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> >> On Sun, 21 May 2017 16:07:06 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Sunday, May 21, 2017 at 11:06:38 AM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> >> >> On Sat, 20 May 2017 10:51:00 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >On Saturday, May 20, 2017 at 1:44:45 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> >> >> >> On Tue, 9 May 2017 07:16:35 -0700 (PDT), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160476288305
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Forbidden Fruit; perhaps the very thing that
> >> >> >> >caused the downfall of Adam & Eve...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> What was the forbidden fruit?
> >> >> >> Do you think a goat herder would understand the spiritual message?.
> >> >>
> >> >> >Maybe, maybe not. You, however, are incapable of understanding anything of importance.
> >> >>
> >> >> It's something you're participating in. Maybe I was in error placing you above
> >> >> a goat herder. My mistake.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >You are a mistake, in every sense of the word, duke.
> >>
> >> And I am still your intellectual master.
> >And which institution of higher learning did you attend?
>
> It put me well over your head.
>

Fat chance, fat boy.

What's the matter? Are you too ashamed to name the institution that endowed you with such abject stupidity?

[Kit]

> university, and engineering in university. (namely, Klown Kollege)
>

So with your so-called education, you should be able to correctly answer the following questions:

Where on a cue ball should a cue stick strike so that the balls rolls without slipping or overspin? (i.e. there no backspin on the motion of the struck ball nor any overspin)

Suppose I tell you that a couple has two children and that one of them is a boy. What is the probability that the other child is also a boy?

> With computer science, you learn to program games, don't you.
>

That, and a whole lot more. You learn about the design of the Internet that you so frequently use, the World Wide Web, and host of other interesting things that are too complicated for your tiny little mind to comprehend.

[Kevrob]

He's supposedly this fellow, from Louisiana:

http://thecatholiccommentator.org/pages/?p=7026

No mention of whether he went to LSU or Unca Bubba's Bible College
and Bait Shop.

Kevin R

[Kit]

No, I'm expressing my contempt for a petty, mean-spirited, nasty person like you.

> Thanks be to God I'm not you, or in your shoes.
>

I can assure you, the feeling is mutual.

If I were a misogynistic, racist, bigoted, unintelligent xenophobe like you, I'd probably kill myself being such an odious, repugnant person.

[Kurt Nicklas]

Don't bother....MIT and Ivy League.... he's beyond help.

[Kurt Nicklas]

Wow, your head is so far up your arse that you look up, see your tonsils and think it's the moon.

Unbelievable......

[hypatiab7]

On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 10:05:12 AM UTC-4, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> On 16 May 2017 05:57 AM ,JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Wow, because it isn't obvious that I
> > represent 99% of your life...
> >
> > Talk to your shrink. Show him this
> > thread. Explain to him what you're
> > pretending is your reason for obsessing
> > over me this time.
>
>
>
> Since there are no attributes, we can only assume that JTEM is speaking to himself.


The only thing JTEM ever talks about is JTEM. No one else will, since there's really no JTEM to talk about. He's a feckless troll who only exists to try to
convince others of how wonderful he is. He isn't.

[Kit]

[hypatiab7]

On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 8:51:50 AM UTC-4, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 5:50:35 AM UTC-4, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> > On 16 May 2017 12:37 PM ,Kurt Nicklas <kurtn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 6:31:42 AM UTC-4, Yap Honghor wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 2:05:51 PM UTC+8, JTEM wrote:
> > > > > Yap Honghor wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Shit stuff....
> > > > >
> > > > > "Write what you know."
> > > > > --Mark Twain
> > > > >
> > > > "Believers are all fools."
> > > > --Con Leader
> > >
> > > "If there were no God, there would be no Atheists."
> > > - GK Chesterton
> >
> >
> > Well, duh!
>

> (1) If God does not exist, atheists do not exist.
> (2) Atheists do exist.
> (3) Therefore God exists.

Once again, JTEM shows how illogical he is. That should be:

(1) If theists do not exist, atheists do not exist.
(2) Atheists do exist.
(3)Therefore theists do exist.

It proves nothing about a God critter.

'If God does not exist', says that someone assumes it exists. The 'If'
is an open question.

[Kurt Nicklas]

Of course, if there were no God then there really would be no theasts. And no theists mean no atheists.

[Kit]

You're obviously projecting, Kurt. Don't butt in conversations where you are obviously ignorant of the pertinent context.

> Unbelievable......

[Kurt Nicklas]

LOL What is the "pertinent context" other than you need to grow up?

'nuff said.

[duke]

Why do you care?

>> What was the forbidden fruit?

Waiting, waiting, waiting.

[duke]

I'll give you a clue - higher education.

>Kevin R

[duke]

On Tue, 23 May 2017 12:32:32 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 1:42:12 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 May 2017 18:26:24 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 5:58:28 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 21 May 2017 16:07:06 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On Sunday, May 21, 2017 at 11:06:38 AM UTC-4, duke wrote:
>> >> >> On Sat, 20 May 2017 10:51:00 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >On Saturday, May 20, 2017 at 1:44:45 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Tue, 9 May 2017 07:16:35 -0700 (PDT), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160476288305
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Forbidden Fruit; perhaps the very thing that
>> >> >> >> >caused the downfall of Adam & Eve...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> What was the forbidden fruit?
>> >> >> >> Do you think a goat herder would understand the spiritual message?.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Maybe, maybe not. You, however, are incapable of understanding anything of importance.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It's something you're participating in. Maybe I was in error placing you above
>> >> >> a goat herder. My mistake.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >You are a mistake, in every sense of the word, duke.
>> >>
>> >> And I am still your intellectual master.
>>
>> >My intellectual masters were Giancarlo Rota who taught me Mathematics at MIT, Steven Boynton who taught me Physics at Princeton, and Karl Lieberherr who taught me Computer Science at Princeton. You are a blithering idiot whose massive ignorance is exceeded only by your abject stupidity.
>>
>> I learned mathematics in elementary and high school, physics in high school and
>> university, and engineering in university. (namely, Klown Kollege)

>So with your so-called education, you should be able to correctly answer the following questions:
>Where on a cue ball should a cue stick strike so that the balls rolls without slipping or overspin? (i.e. there no backspin on the motion of the struck ball nor any overspin)

Preferably on the side opposite the direction of non-rotational movement.

>Suppose I tell you that a couple has two children and that one of them is a boy. What is the probability that the other child is also a boy?

Here's mine. Does a ball on a string rotate?

>> With computer science, you learn to program games, don't you.
>That, and a whole lot more. You learn about the design of the Internet that you so frequently use, the World Wide Web, and host of other interesting things that are too complicated for your tiny little mind to comprehend.

Computer science has to be about the weakest science there is in computers.

[Kit]

I want to know so I can advise my niece what institution(s) she should not consider attending, as they produce poorly educated graduates.

> >> What was the forbidden fruit?
>
> Waiting, waiting, waiting.
>

Waiting for Godot?

[Kit]

What other sciences are there "in computers"? Name them, if you can.

[duke]

On Tue, 23 May 2017 13:24:03 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7 <hypa...@comcast.net>

wrote:

>On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 8:51:50 AM UTC-4, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>> On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 5:50:35 AM UTC-4, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>> > On 16 May 2017 12:37 PM ,Kurt Nicklas <kurtn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 6:31:42 AM UTC-4, Yap Honghor wrote:
>> > > > On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 2:05:51 PM UTC+8, JTEM wrote:
>> > > > > Yap Honghor wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Shit stuff....
>> > > > >
>> > > > > "Write what you know."
>> > > > > --Mark Twain
>> > > > >
>> > > > "Believers are all fools."
>> > > > --Con Leader
>> > >
>> > > "If there were no God, there would be no Atheists."
>> > > - GK Chesterton
>> >
>> >
>> > Well, duh!
>>
>> (1) If God does not exist, atheists do not exist.
>> (2) Atheists do exist.
>> (3) Therefore God exists.
>
>Once again, JTEM shows how illogical he is. That should be:
>
>(1) If theists do not exist, atheists do not exist.
>(2) Atheists do exist.
>(3)Therefore theists do exist.
>
>It proves nothing about a God critter.

Actually, you got it backwards"
1. God does exist.
2. Theists do exist.
3. Therefore there is no such thing as an atheist.

>'If God does not exist', says that someone assumes it exists. The 'If'
>is an open question.

Not a change. The evidence is overwhelming for the existence for God.

[duke]

On Tue, 23 May 2017 12:39:31 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 1:43:51 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 May 2017 18:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 5:58:28 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 21 May 2017 16:07:06 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On Sunday, May 21, 2017 at 11:06:38 AM UTC-4, duke wrote:
>> >> >> On Sat, 20 May 2017 10:51:00 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >On Saturday, May 20, 2017 at 1:44:45 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Tue, 9 May 2017 07:16:35 -0700 (PDT), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/160476288305
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Forbidden Fruit; perhaps the very thing that
>> >> >> >> >caused the downfall of Adam & Eve...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> What was the forbidden fruit?
>> >> >> >> Do you think a goat herder would understand the spiritual message?.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Maybe, maybe not. You, however, are incapable of understanding anything of importance.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It's something you're participating in. Maybe I was in error placing you above
>> >> >> a goat herder. My mistake.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >You are a mistake, in every sense of the word, duke.
>> >>
>> >> And I am still your intellectual master.

>> >Your intellectual master was the priest who butt-fucked you in the ass, deposited his semen in your rectum, and told you that you just received the Holy Spirit. And you believed him.
>> Now you're letting your unwiped ass override your mouth, aren't you.
>No, I'm expressing my contempt for a petty, mean-spirited, nasty person like you.

Yet you are the asshole that talked about my priest BF me in the ass, shitface.
You're real trash, real crude trash..

>> Thanks be to God I'm not you, or in your shoes.
>I can assure you, the feeling is mutual.
>If I were a misogynistic, racist, bigoted, unintelligent xenophobe like you, I'd probably kill myself being such an odious, repugnant person.

There, that clearly shows how lost you are. Just remember, when you die it WILL
be like you killing yourself and going to hell.

[duke]

On Tue, 23 May 2017 12:56:28 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas <kurtn...@gmail.com>

Yep, kit is going down hard.

[duke]

He is. You're the one with your head stuck up your unwiped ass.

>
>> Unbelievable......

[Kit]

The evidence is even more overwhelming that you lack basic cognitive skills. In short, you are babbling idiot. You cannot comprehend simple terms and expressions such as "proselytize", "idolatry", "bastard", and "your help is not wanted nor needed". Your cognitive skills are less developed than those of a brute animal. Pavlov's dogs can learn via conditioning, but you are obviously unable to master even that simple skill, as demonstrated by your repeated attempts to "help" the poor atheists being oblivious to their pleadings to you that you are an annoyance.

-- Kit

[Kit]

How about your comments regarding President Obama, asshole?
You're what's known as "white trash". Have a nice day.

-- Kit

> >> Thanks be to God I'm not you, or in your shoes.
> >I can assure you, the feeling is mutual.
> >If I were a misogynistic, racist, bigoted, unintelligent xenophobe like you, I'd probably kill myself being such an odious, repugnant person.
>
> There, that clearly shows how lost you are. Just remember, when you die it WILL
> be like you killing yourself and going to hell.
>

<sarcasm>
I'm real scared, duke.
</sarcasm>

[Kit]

Talk is cheap. I'd like to see you back up your claims with some real evidence.

-- Kit

[Tim]

Which really means everyone would be an atheist, silly kunt, learn some logic.

[Kurt Nicklas]

Oh, Dim believes that his dog is an atheist because the pooch lacks belief in God? That's the implication of what you just wrote.

It's been claimed here before. I always have a good laugh.

https://carm.org/i-lack-belief-god

IC | XC
-------
NI | KA

[Kevrob]

On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 12:32:08 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:

> 1. God does exist.
> 2. Theists do exist.
> 3. Therefore there is no such thing as an atheist.
>

More evidence of Earl proselytizing.

He has been presented with the dictionary definition.
He chooses to think of it as just trying to get people to
switch from one faith to another, but he is wrong.
Attempting to make converts of the unbelieving is included, also.

What an appalling attempt at a syllogism. It isn't an argument,
as much as a list. Sort of like the fake airplanes built by
cargo cultists.

Intro to Logic must not have been a required course at UBBC&BS

Kevin R

[Kevrob]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Apologetics_and_Research_Ministry

More bible Babble.

Kevin R