David Von Pein wrote:
> ROBERT HARRIS SAID:
>
> And I saw nothing at your links which addressed the late night call,
> ...or about the statements of Connally, Wade, Nolan and Bell, regarding
> the actual bullet that wounded Connally.
>
> Wade delivered that bullet to the DPD on the night of the 22nd. It
> couldn't [possibly] have been the one that Tomlinson found.
>
>
> DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
>
> Henry Wade didn't "deliver" any *whole bullet* to the DPD. And you have
> absolutely *no* evidence to back up such a claim.
David, you know that was an error on my part. It was Nolan who delivered
the bullet to the DPD. Even the FBI confirmed that.
>
> If Wade had delivered an intact bullet to the DPD that had dropped off of
> Governor Connally's stretcher, that bullet would be part of the official
> evidence in this case today. And, of course, no such "Wade bullet" exists
> in the record, does it Bob?
Stop it David. We've discussed this before and you KNOW very well that I
meant to say it was Nolan who delivered the bullet.
>
> Now Bob will pretend the "Wade bullet" was swept under the rug by the evil
> DPD (and/or the wicked FBI). Won't you, Bob?
Connally said the bullet fell from his gurney and was picked up by a
nurse.
Wade encountered that nurse who was holding the "bullet" in her hand and
said it came from Connally's "gurney".
She then gave the bullet to officer Nolan, who also stated that she said
it came from Connally's "gurney".
ALL THREE referred to a whole bullet. ALL THREE referred to a bullet come
Connally's "gurney".
How do you explain that David?
That's ridiculous, David. Trained medical personnel are not the same as
FBI agents. ER nurses know what a bullet is and how critically important
it is to get the details right. Bell, especially, as a supervisor, had
to be aware of such things. There is NO way she would have told the
District attorney and a police officer that the tiny particle she had
processed, was a whole bullet.
Bell flatly denied the FBI's claim that she told them she gave anything
to Nolan. And their deception was further confirmed by their constant
reference to a single "fragment".
And it is ludicrous to think that Wade thought she was holding a whole
bullet in her hand, rather than four tiny particles.
And how do you explain the fact that the nurse who recovered the bullet,
told both of these men that it came from Connally's "gurney", and that
Connally ALSO said the bullet fell from his gurney??
That is not something anyone would have just assumed. The intuitive
presumption would be that the bullet was recovered in surgery.
>
> The exact same kind of "Fragments become a whole bullet" mistake that has
> plagued the Sibert/O'Neill FBI report undoubtedly also occurred with
> respect to any comments about a whole "bullet" that were made by Henry
> Wade, Bobby Nolan, Audrey Bell, or anyone else associated with those
> bullet fragments which became Warren Commission Exhibit No. 842.
So, tell me more about your theory, David.
Did Bell just forget that that a few minutes earlier, she placed four
tiny fragments into an envelope and labelled it as containing multiple
frags from the arm??
Or did she correctly tell Wade and Nolan that these were fragments,
taken from surgery, but they misunderstood her, thinking she said it was
a whole bullet, from Connally's "gurney"?
And was it just a coincidence, that Connally also thought the bullet
fell from his gurney?
Did Bell suffer an hallucination when she denied the FBI's claim that
she said she gave fragments to Nolan, and stated that she gave them to
two plain-clothed agents in her office?
And where is the receipt which contained the name of at least one of
those agents, and had to have been confiscated by the FBI in order to
confirm the chain of possession??
The ARRB couldn't find it and neither can anyone else.
Robert Harris