Bookhout figure in newspaper is really legendary Texas Ranger Bob Crowder

[Ralph Cinque]

Big, big, big, big, big, big news! The James Bookhout figure that they
recently came up with from the newspaper is actually legendary Texas
Ranger Bob Crowder. Take a look:

https://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2017/09/look-at-this-image-again-and-read.html

[InsideSparta]

Stop all this foolishness. Bob Crowder is the guy in the photo on the far
left. He was born in 1901 and would have been 67 years old when that photo
was taken. No way is the man on the far right, who is identified as being
James Bookhout, is 67 years old. You're insulting the intelligence of not
only the people that read this forum, but also the people that read your
blog. You need to just be a man and admit you've been mistaken about James
Bookhout being complicit in the shooting of Oswald. I didn't have much
respect for you before this latest revelation photo of Bookhout surfaced,
but I really find your unwillingness to admit your error as extremely
revolting, and showing a complete lack of character. Shame on you.

[bpete1969]

No, Bookhout is Bookhout and Crowder is Crowder.Both are in the photo.
Both are taller than your garage shooter.

Sucks to be you, I know

[Mark OBLAZNEY]

Cinque figure on internett is really legendary Texas Ranger Tiny Tim

[Ralph Cinque]

You guys are both full of it. The guy on the right is Crowder. Yeah, he
looks younger than 67, but it's an altered photo. They doctored him,
puffing up his face so that it would match the puffy face of Bookhout in
the yearbook photo.

But, they couldn't change everything, and the biggest thing they couldn't
change was his posture, which was very upright, unlike that stooped guy on
the left. And he looks as much older than 67 and the man on the right
looks younger than 67. He really looks like an old man, all stooped over.
Crowder was this rugged guy, and there is nothing rugged about that guy on
the left. He looks like he worked in an office his whole life, sitting
over a desk.

It's Crowder on the right, whether you like it or not.

http://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2017/09/punks-will-be-punks.html

[Lance Uppercut]

Big, big, big, big, big, big news! In a desperate attempt to save face
internet fantasist Ralph Cinque insists that newspapers must be read from
right to left!

Of course in the real world, Bob Crowder is the figure on the left of the
photo, exactly as the caption describes - Crowder was aged sixty-seven at
the time of this photo. Further confirmation can be found in this video,
where Crowder appears (and identifies himself ) at the 7.48 mark.

http://www.texasarchive.org/library/index.php?title=2009_00648

[InsideSparta]

So, according to you, those sneaky conspirators were doctoring the photos
published by a small Texas town newspaper five years after the
assassination? Get over yourself already. That's just plain ridiculous. Be
a man and admit you were wrong about Bookhout. I might be able to garner
up a bit of respect for you if you did. Be a man already.

[Mark OBLAZNEY]

Uhm did you run this by Jim Fetzer, Ralph? It needs his approval first.

[Betty Drew]

Thanks Lance, for providing the link to the film.

[Ralph Cinque]

The Wizard has made this gif showing the perfect proportionality between
the figure on the right and Bob Crowder.

So, James Bookhout just happened to be the exact same size and proportion
as Bob Crowder? And the other guy? He couldn't even stand straight.
Crowder stood straight as an arrow. Look:

That old guy on the left looks more like 87 than 67. I'm 5 months, I'll be
67. And I won't be standing like that, and Crowder certainly didn't stand
like that. He stood straight and tall.


They puffed up his face on the left, no doubt because Bookhout's face
looks puffy in the yearbook photo. But, are these noses a match? Are these
ears?


My Good God! Are these the same noses?

If they are the same noses, what does it take for noses to be different?

That is Bob Crowder standing closest to the exhibit, and that is certain,
despite the puffiness they added to his face to liken him to Young
Bookhout. And no doubt they darkened his hair, as if Bookhout reached the
age of 54 with no jet black hair and not a hint of grey. I bet he didn't
even have black hair.

https://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2017/09/the-wizard-has-made-this-gif-showing.html

[David Von Pein]

On Monday, September 18, 2017 at 9:24:07 PM UTC-4, Ralph Cinque wrote:
> You guys are both full of it. The guy on the right is Crowder. Yeah, he
> looks younger than 67, but it's an altered photo.

What a surprise! Ralph Cinque has just claimed that yet another photo has
been "altered". I think that's the first fake item discovered by Ralph
since---yesterday!

*Everything* that doesn't meet Ralph's requirements is *instantly*
labelled as fake or "altered". There is no limit to the number of things
that Ralph is willing to label as "altered" in this case. No limit at
all---as he just proved above (yet again).

I'll ask Ralph again....

"You can surely see the absurdity of claiming that so many different
images and films are phony, can't you Ralph?" -- DVP; August 13, 2017

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2017/05/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-1247.html

[Ralph Cinque]

You didn't say anything, DVP. You didn't address the issue at hand. You
just blathered. The fact is that that tall, straight-backed man was Bob
Crowder, and the match to known pictures of Crowder is excellent. The
other man, who was much older and dilapidated (all bent over) was not
Crowder. And why don't you try to stay on point? We are talking about
Crowder.

http://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2017/09/how-can-that-be-crowder-at-67-when-this.html

[Anthony Marsh]

On 9/20/2017 2:28 PM, David Von Pein wrote:
> On Monday, September 18, 2017 at 9:24:07 PM UTC-4, Ralph Cinque wrote:
>> You guys are both full of it. The guy on the right is Crowder. Yeah, he
>> looks younger than 67, but it's an altered photo.
>
> What a surprise! Ralph Cinque has just claimed that yet another photo has
> been "altered". I think that's the first fake item discovered by Ralph
> since---yesterday!
>
> *Everything* that doesn't meet Ralph's requirements is *instantly*
> labelled as fake or "altered". There is no limit to the number of things
> that Ralph is willing to label as "altered" in this case. No limit at
> all---as he just proved above (yet again).
>
> I'll ask Ralph again....
>
> "You can surely see the absurdity of claiming that so many different
> images and films are phony, can't you Ralph?" -- DVP; August 13, 2017
>

No, he can't. Don't be so silly.
This is why I need to attack alterationists every day.
So, you go to the other extreme and can never admit that ANY evidence
has been tampered with or destroyed. The truth is somewhere between
those extremes.

[Jason Burke]

Geez, Ralph. I could make a better case for it being legendary Texas
Ranger Nolan Ryan.