In the events of the real world, Whitaker is absolutely a liar.
At the level of disinfo about the limo, he does fit in. He even has the
right credentials for that -- a distant part of the FMC, 30 miles down the
river from the executive FMC building, but one of the many employees who
heard that something very wrong had happened that involved the limo. His
story fits with the countless other stories of where the limo was in the
days and weeks after the assassination. Perhaps we can have some
resolution in that this gives a clear indication of just how successful
the original strategy was.
On Saturday, January 4, 2014 5:16:21 PM UTC-6, mainframetech wrote:
> On Friday, January 3, 2014 7:45:46 PM UTC-5, deke wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, January 2, 2014 6:35:27 PM UTC-5,
jfk...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> > >
http://www.lewrockwell.com/2012/06/douglas-p-horne/photographic-evidence-of-bullet-hole-in-jfk-limousine-windshield-hiding-in-plain-sight/
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > I have emailed both Lew Rockwell and Doug Horne, and hopefully they will
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > begin to address the false statements in this article. I will be
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > disecting it here as well, so this should be a good arena for
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > discussion...
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Pamela Brown
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
ss100x.com
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Regarding the sightings of the through and through bullet hole in the
>
> >
>
> > windshield, you mentioned three witnesses in you Lancer presentation.
>
> >
>
> > There were actually six, including two Dallas policemen and a Ford Motor
>
> >
>
> > Co. employee, George Whitaker. Just wondering what your take is on
>
> >
>
> > Whitaker's account about the hole and the destruction and replacement of
>
> >
>
> > the original windshield. It's a real stretch for me to thing that six
>
> >
>
> > witnesses, all of them professional people, could be mistaken about what
>
> >
>
> > they saw from a close up view.
>
>
>
>
>
> Pamela has already labeled George Whitaker as a liar in these threads.
>
> I've been contending with her that it is not true and asked for her backup
>
> or proof, but none has been forthcoming. Whitaker had no reason to lie
>
> back then. He also wanted to remain anonymous until after his death.
>
>
>
> Whitaker is also corroborated by the date he said he saw the windshield
>
> with the hole in it. It was on the 25th of Nov. and the W.H. garage log
>
> shows that no one accessed the limo on that date, but they did just before
>
> and after it. There's no way that Whitaker would know that and pick just
>
> the right date for his experience.
>
>
>
> Chris