These are your ideas. You are the one who needs to establish them.
> Again, you are the one
> > who needs to establish these things. The building still stands, go there
> > and take pictures showing the physical configurations that show your ideas
> > to be correct. Stop with the "show I am wrong or I get to believe silly
> > things" approach.
> >
> > > Bud in denial
> > > is a sight to see....
> > >
> > > You might see both as equal possibilities.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > The comparable SIXTH-floor window is wide open--at the beginning of the
> > > > > filmstrip....
> > > >
> > > > <snicker> Clues, Don, clues!
> > >
> > > aka facts!
> >
> > It is a fact that Oswald said he was a patsy. It is also a fact that
> > that doesn`t establish that he didn`t shoot and kill JFK.
> >
>
> True. I'm 50-50 on that.... Of course, if you're admitting the first half
> of that--that he was a patsy--then you're admitting there was a
> conspiracy....
Only if one is unable to make the distinction between Oswald saying it
and it being true.
> > Focusing on all the wrong "facts" is what is preventing you from
> > figuring out a pretty simple crime.
> >
>
> You have trouble with the "right" facts!
What "facts" have you presented? Is it a fact that the "5" column is on
the 5th floor? Is it a fact that Valentine is on the fifth floor in the
photo you referenced?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Pretty simple, but Bud has to complicate matters to get what
> > > > > > > he wants.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *I* complicate things? Put all your ideas out there, cops moving
> > > > > > evidence around, some cops in on it, some not and the media filming during
> > > > > > all these shenanigans. Fritz going to Parkland but then return to plant
> > > > > > bullets, A bunch of nonsense that you can`t begin to support with reports
> > > > > > of chicken bones and window openings.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't think that this window-opening business here is germane to my
> > > > > "ideas". It's just a fact which you don't want to accept. It just takes
> > > > > a grain or two of sand off the sixth-floor side of the scale and puts it
> > > > > on the fifth floor. Apparently not conclusive of anything further....
> > > >
> > > > Move all the sand around you like, dw, it is a silly hobby.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Cornered, Bud resorts to generalities.
> >
> > How can I be "cornered", when you haven`t produced anything of
> > substance? My challenge, which you ignored, was for you to spell out your
> > ideas so they can be seen for what they really are, and be dismissed out
> > of hand. Tell us about "The Plan", what was it? Fritz had bullets on his
> > person, but went to Parkland first then returned to plant them?
>
> No. He picked them up on the fifth floor almost as soon as he came back.
> They were found about 12:55; he got there about 1:00.
And he would know that Alyea didn`t film them, nobody photographed them,
how many people saw them, ect? There was a shooter on the 5th floor with
other witnesses and they somehow missed this? Spell it all out, dw, how do
your ideas possibly work?
> How were
> > these police enlisted, did someone approach them and say "Look, we are
> > going to shoot a popular President
>
> You keep using "popular". Don't forget that many hated him in Texas, as
> per the newspaper ads that month.
What did Nellie say to JFK right before Oswald shot him? "Mr President,
you can`t say that Dallas doesn`t love you".
It is a grand canyon jump between disliking a President and the things
you suggest. And it wouldn`t even take a Kennedy lover to get wind of the
things you suggest to blow the whistle, it could easily be someone who
didn`t like him.
And have you shown the least bit of animosity towards Kennedy by any of
these people you have "in on it"?
> , and we would like to enlist you help.
> > Even though there is no discernible upside for you to do this, and you are
> > risking your freedom, your life and you risk your family shamed and your
> > children tormented, we expect you will jump at the opportunity. And have
> > no fear of the intense scrutiny this crime will receive."
> >
>
> Actually, they'd probably start with, You know, we'll be the ones HANDLING
> THE EVIDENCE....
The games you play can only be done retrospectively, you can`t show how
what you suggest could be a viable plan beforehand. You have dozens and
dozens of people involved, each a variable. The cops went up to the
seventh, in the attic with flashlights, but there were other cops just
moving around. And what if Brennan says "Look, Shooter!" (or anyone else
for that matter) and 50 or a hundred people instantly charge into the TSBD
and charge up every flight of steps and take every elevator? Or hundreds
of variations of this. Remember, these people involved are looking at the
death penalty, assuming that only people "in on it" will get control of
all the evidence before any media can film it would be just foolhardy,
you`d need a death wish to get involved in such an undertaking. And the
people you have most heavily involved aren`t even there at the most
critical time, immediately after the shooting. And what is the upside, can
you show anyone benefiting from this enormous risk? From a reality
oriented perspective it is silly from start to finish, so what is the
point of looking at window openings when they can`t possibly bear the
weight of the things you are suggesting?
> > > I guess Ben H is right--you simply
> > > run from facts.
> >
> > What facts have I been running from?
>
> See above.
State what you see as facts that you have presented.
> >
> > And using Ben Holmes as a source of wisdom is a bad sign.
> >
>
> Figured you'd say something like that. So predictable.
You and he share the same problem, you can`t tell actual facts from
things you accept as fact.
> > I noticed this, see what you make of it. A voiceover on these excepts of
> > the Alyea film (at 0:22), apparently from the time of the assassination
> > says...
> >
> > "Gerry Hill, of the Dallas Police Department just leaned out a window,
> > and apparently they found some shells, they`re in that room..."
> >
>
> By saying "that room", they indicate that they, the speaker that is, was
> NOT in that room, and so they don't know WHAT was found.
<snicker> There you go. It is just some strange coincidence that Hill is
indicating where shells were said to be found and the voiceover mentions
shells, and cops and deputies say shells were found there but all this is
trumped by chicken bones.
> And it's curious that there are photos of Hill at a window, but NONE of
> Deputy Mooney's famous shout out a window....
There you go, part two. You ignore what is available for consideration
because it goes against you ideas and focus on something you don`t have.
"Gerry Hill, of the Dallas Police Department just leaned out a window,
and apparently they found some shells, they`re in that room..."
> > Gerald Hill has the shells being found before Fritz got there (12:15 on)....
> >
> >
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0KFei3W7bGON3R3WFJoWDktX2s/view
> >
>
> Yes, Hill, Sawyer, and Valentine went upstairs about 12:50, found the
> shells about 12:55, very quickly, because--as Sawyer testified--officers
> had told Sawyer that they saw a rifle on the fifth floor, "second window
> from the end". (Patrolman Hill, Sgt. Harkness).
So you don`t dispute that the shells were found before Fritz arrived.
> > > > > > > All you have to do is go down one floor, not imagine the routes
> > > > > > > of officers or reasons for moving a window down a few inches....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Easy peasy, and long as you totally disregard reality.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Your reality seems to have nothing to do with facts here!
> > > >
> > > > Facts are facts and silly figuring is silly figuring.
> > > >
> > > > Your figuring has a popular President killed and many people rushing
> > > > into the TSBD to immediately start moving evidence around with the media
> > > > filming. None of it makes any real-world sense, it is all a bunch of
> > > > imagination and nonsense.
> > >
> > > No, just clear examination of that clip you originally presented. YOU'RE
> > > the one moving things around in your mind....
> >
> > Are you denying that your idea is that members of the DPD rushed into
> > the TSBD and immediately started moving evidence around? These are not
> > your silly ideas?
> >
>
> Fritz went in and picked up the shells. He never denied that.
They aren`t there still so someone did.
And you never denied that I accurately described your position as one
where members of the DPD rushed into the TSBD and started moving evidence
around.