On Sunday, December 2, 2018 at 1:40:47 PM UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Sunday, December 2, 2018 at 10:50:31 AM UTC-5, Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 2, 2018 at 12:49:35 AM UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
> >
> > > On Usenet what you do is called a gay lame, Pendragon.
> > >
> > > That about nails it.
> >
> > The terms have a sexual connotation
>
> Yes, homosexual, as in "gay lame".
No, Will. Heterosexuals can perform/receive those same acts.
> Karla Rogers nailed this type of flame war attack here ten years ago, when Dennis Hammes and others were using the "gay lame" to attack other poets:
>
>
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.arts.poetry.comments/qTwMcnwkkl0/2hQqO4suGr4J
>
> Re: Karla Rogers' statement on 'homophobic thinking'
>
> "Now, I have no idea what most of you mean when you bash someone by depicting them in homosexual acts, whether it is with words or pictures... Those types of pictures are offensive to me but I can also be
> offended by what someone writes. We communicate less by pictures on
> the poetry newsgroups but that doesn't mean that the picture words we
> create aren't as offensive as a picture. It's just that the picture as
> communication has more shock value because we use pictures less here..."
> -Karla Rogers
>
> The point is that the "gay lame" you use against me and Zod is... lame
For the 20th time, there's nothing inherently homosexual in any of those terms.
They are commonly used social media terms for brown-nosing.
Apparently, I've accidentally expose a nerve in your relationship with Did.
You've done Did? Did did you?
Honestly, I couldn't care less.