N Y
unread,Sep 19, 2012, 7:24:19 PM9/19/12Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Sign in to report message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to ahashop_...@googlegroups.com
Hello, lovely board members!
It's that time! I am opening up this email thread to discussing our
thoughts, what we've found during our research, and what remains to be
done on our 501c3 application. *Everyone* should have something to
contribute by now, so let's make this a useful discussion and get this
over with already. :)
I'll start by saying that I notice we have a few key areas that have not
been adequately responded to, namely:
- 5.3.a. should probably be filled out by Josh with the rough number of
hours he worked. I am updating 5.3.b. to be "no".
- 5.5.a. We don't have a specific conflict of interest policy, though it
is briefly mentioned for our officers (but not the board). The note
below this section on Form 1023 points out: "A conflict of interest
policy is recommended though it is not required to obtain exemption." so
maybe we are good with what we have. Noisebridge has a much more
thorough policy, but Hive13's is just a brief section near the end of
their bylaws. Thoughts?
- 6.1.a/b. We need to flesh these out on the wiki. Does this apply to
Bright Futures? Our Gemsi (or similar) fund-raiser?
- 7.1. Anyone have any input on this section? We need to identify
someone who can help us with this (Mrs. Hunter?) if not. Schedule G
itself looks fairly easy to fill in, but need to make sure we answer
them carefully due to the somewhat peculiar nature of our acquisition.
- 7.2. We still need to complete Schedule E, relating to us not
submitting this stuff prior to 27 months after formation.
- 8.2.c. We need to clarify this part. We have indeed done fundraising,
even if it's not much.
- 8.11. I'm pretty sure "real property" means things related to
buildings, facilities, etc.. For what it's worth, Noisebridge answered
"no".
- 10.1. I believe this is "no". Noisebridge also has "no".
- 10.5. Should probably check "h" (see Noisebridge)
- 10.6. I think since we're more established, we should choose the
Definitive Ruling option here. Might require some lawyering and/or
records searching. Input?
Onward/tally ho/etc., directors!
-- Nate