Hello Jeff,
Just wanted to let u know, that the errors have not occured for 2
weeks now.
Apart from this change concerning the "Expect: 100-continue" header i
havent changed
anything in my code.
Anyways, this change did not seem to do the trick, since a different
type of error occured aftwards.
I dont really know why it is working now, but lets hope it will stay
like that :)
Thanks for your efforts!
regards,
--qu
On 18 Mai, 16:28, AdWords API Advisor <
adwordsapiadvi...@google.com>
wrote:
> Just to follow up on this publicly: if anyone using one of the .NET
> languages has seen an increase in "An existing connection was forcibly
> closed by the remote host." exceptions, could you try disabling the
> "Expect: 100-continue" header in your HTTP requests, as described at
>
>
http://blogs.msdn.com/joncole/archive/2005/09/08/462659.aspx
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.net.servicepointmanage...
> > > > problems. Since I've updated toAPIv13, I'm having the same errors.
>
> > > > Only the strangest thing I have is, it isn't happening every time...
> > > > We are running our tool every night at 04.00 GMT +1. Sometimes the
> > > > tool completes his task with no error or disconnection at all, but
> > > > there are also some night when the error popups with the message "An
> > > > existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host"
>
> > > > I don't know if you already have more information about this problem
> > > > and how to solve this.
>
> > > > My situation is exactly the same as jeff: a
ASP.NET tool, with just
> > > > some small add, edit or deleting requests.
>
> > > > Regards,
>
> > > > Pazcal
>
> > > > On 7 mei, 22:38, quaylar <
che...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hello Jeff,
>
> > > > > I appreciate your help, thank you very much.
> > > > > I just sent an email to
adwordsapiadvi...@google.com with my MCC
> > > > > customer-id.
>
> > > > > best regards,
>
> > > > > --qu
>
> > > > > On 6 Mai, 16:58,AdWordsAPIAdvisor <
adwordsapiadvi...@google.com>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Hello Qu,
>
> > > > > > If you could give me some more information about your requests I
> > > > > > could do some spot checks in the production logs--I'm not sure that
> > > > > > anything conclusive will turn up, but I'll see. Either a requestId
> > > > > > from the SOAP response header of a successful request, or the customer
> > > > > > id number of your MCC account should give me enough info about your
> > > > > > account to find your requests.
>
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > -Jeff Posnick,AdWordsAPI Team
>
> > > > > > On May 5, 5:11 am, quaylar <
che...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Hi again Jeff,
>
> > > > > > > Unfort. i wasnt able to resolve this issue so far.
> > > > > > > Is it possible forAdwordsSupport, to check their logs regarding the
> > > > > > > "apihit-limit" that was mentioned
> > > > > > > by you in one of the linked threads?
> > > > > > > It would be of great help to know, whether the connection was really
> > > > > > > reset on Google's side, or
> > > > > > > whether something else is the problem here.
> > > > > > > I'd gladly email you the email-adresses of the accounts that are
> > > > > > > accessed here, so u can check your logs regarding
> > > > > > > any error-messages.
>
> > > > > > > regards,
>
> > > > > > > --qu
>
> > > > > > > On 30 Apr., 18:23, quaylar <
che...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Hello Jeff,
>
> > > > > > > > Thank u very much for your answer, i will try to give u more detailed
> > > > > > > > information.
> > > > > > > > As i stated before, the whole sync is taking 1,5-2h usually, right now
> > > > > > > > this exception
> > > > > > > > occurs after abt 1h.
> > > > > > > > The point is, there is no single individual call to theAPIthat is
> > > > > > > > supposed to take a long time.
> > > > > > > > Due to the nature of this application, i was not able to makeAPI
> > > > > > > > calls, passing in arrays of objects, but
> > > > > > > > rather had to pass each object in a separateAPI-Call.
> > > > > > > > Im aware of the fact, that passing in arrays, saves lots of protocol-
> > > > > > > > overhead, but it would require me to
> > > > > > > > rewrite parts of the application. Moreover i guess _then_ the
> > > > > > > > possibilty for long individualAPI-Calls would
> > > > > > > > increase.
>
> > > > > > > > However as i said, there are not really longAPI-Calls, im not
> > > > > > > > generating reports, im just adding/deleting/modifying
> > > > > > > > campaigns/ad-groups/ads/keywords.
> > > > > > > > Nothing else.
>
> > > > > > > > So i guess the duration of individual calls cant be a problem here -
> > > > > > > > is there any other possible reason?
> > > > > > > > I will check out the information in the link provided, thanks so far
> > > > > > > > Jeff.
>
> > > > > > > > regards,
>
> > > > > > > > --qu
>
> > > > > > > > On 30 Apr., 17:47,AdWordsAPI Advisor <
adwordsapiadvi...@google.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Hello Quaylar,
>
> > > > > > > > > If the individualAPIcalls you're making taking an exceedingly long
> > > > > > > > > > Is there any hit-limit on theAPI, any max. usage-time at once etc,