Not idealistic. Simplistic and hopefully robust. Often these are
orthogonal. Let me uncompress a little bit:
Once we bring in all kinds of regulations and prizes, the proverbial
Argumentative Indian takes over and you're bound to make at least a
few people unhappy. As we'll find out in the next 3-4 days on this
thread :P
Re. support, cycling is easier: carry food in your pockets, hang it
from your bikes whatever. Worst case, stop and eat idlis. In a long
race it won't affect your time all that much. Hopefully, people won't
draft trucks on long road-rides. If they do, they won't survive crits
or short TTs so no worries anyway :)
Re. prizes, how many levels do you foresee? One prize for Samim,
another for road bikes, a third for MTB with slicks, fourth for MTBs,
and a fifth for single-speed? And where do hybrids fit?
Re. the complex algebra of participation vs. organization etc, soon
you'll find that the problem becomes PSPACE-hard. You're better off
taking the "economics way" and build incentive into the mechanism
rather than rules. Hence, offering points for organizing. Earn it the
physically hard way or the mentally hard way.
Taking a lot of possibilities off the table should speed up things by
eliminating a lot of debate. No more armchair cycling.
To give an example of Jagan's TT (JTT?) success, someone exulted after
his TT the other day "Not bad for an MTB!" when he compared his time
to road bikers' times. I think that's pretty good. People will extract
their own satisfaction out of participating.