LAStools - efficient tools for LiDAR processing

Hi Wes, never worry. Give it a try, we expect it will work. If not, give an example and we will

Hi Prajwal, following the SHP specification shape files can contain different type of shapes. Within

Hi all, We have released a new LASzip version (3.5.0) that supports LAS 1.5: https://github.com/

Hi Brett, it's sad that you are not able to share data. Even if data are confidential you easy

Hi Malcolm, probably you run into a size issue. Blast is proud to process files up to 2 billion

Excellent- thank you! Ben On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 1:35 PM Jochen Rapidlasso <rapid...@gmail.com

Oh, easy, thank you! On Tuesday, 25 November 2025 at 6:56:19 am UTC+11 Jochen Rapidlasso wrote: Hi

Hi Karl, Thank you very much for your help and for taking the time to look at the data. Using the z-

When attempting to use proj integrations with las2las, lastools fails with a memory allocation error

Hi Jochen, Here's a link to a zip of the two files https://drive.google.com/file/d/

Hi Jochen, that is what I was looking for. Regards, Karin Von: LAStools - efficient tools for LiDAR

Hi all, we are pleased to announce the integration of the universal vector library GDAL into LAStools

Thanks Jochen. The answer will be useful for me. thanks. LAStools - efficient tools for LiDAR

Hi Jochen, That works exactly as I want to. I tried that same argument other ways and didn't work

Great, will test it very soon ! On Friday, October 10, 2025 at 2:32:31 PM UTC+7 Jochen Rapidlasso

Hi Monica, you are right: -vc is exact identical to -vci. All numbers you put behind one of this

Okay, great, thanks, everything works! It was really just that -remove_all_evlrs was missing. There

Jochen, as you say, it's just working fine ! On Friday, August 29, 2025 at 4:10:11 AM UTC+7

Oh! I've played with a similar workflow as a way to use TLS.laz as control for MLS in RiProcess.

Hi Ken, looking at the log output there are some warnings and errors: (a) No license file found. Run

Hi Jochen, thank you for the info. Regards Karin Von: last...@googlegroups.com <lastools@

Hi Jo, this problem should be fixed with release of today (250825): (plain // with GUI). Cheers,

Great, I think that's got it! I'll do a bit more testing and checking. Thanks very much, -

Hi Monika, probably right now the only way is to give the P95 value as a absolute value. So if

I just looked at the latest distribution of LAStools and noticed that the 32-bit version of laszip.

Hi Claudia, thanks for this hint. Yes, a missing GPU or missing OpenGL capability would cause a much

Hi Leo, the scale factor is the one you give as parameter [n] with the argument, normalized to the

Hi Terje, thanks for this hint. We don't think you do something wrong. It is just like this: We,

Hi Mike, thank you for your patience. We did a change to the las2las conversion logic which hopefully

Hi Jan, thank you for your feedback and the suggestion! It should be no problem to add the option to