Bell inequalities and quantum foundations

Richard What would happen if your colored regions on the disk reduce to lines determining points on

Dear Alexei You misinterpret me. I think that good philosophers do not think obscurely. If their work

Maybe somebody can help me make out what this paper is actually saying. The author sent it to me

Hi everyone, Following up on the preprint of the Propagation Delay and Temporal Coincidence Bounds

I have posted a technical addendum addressing two physical objections that likely arise when

Dear Mark, That definition is not merely locality. It is locality plus scalar screening plus global

My paper Schrödinger's Cat Meets Occam's Razor mdpi.com was inspired by abstract algebraic

Ghenadie, that definition only makes sense if we can define “the outcome that Bob would have seen,

Dear Richard, At the end, Hitler was defeated. My article was written in the hope that ultimately,

Dear Leo Thank you for having read my section 5.3 in Richard's, Inge's and my paper. Comments

Hi Anton, I finally got to reply to you. Thanks and your points are well motivated, but can all be

Dear Parker Thanks for the attempt to explain. Unfortunately I don't know the mathematical

Very sorry, my error in my previous post, it is Figure 9 (not 8). I have looked up BBO devices again

Dear Richard, you wrote <Apart from that, it might be a very good paper. I can't read, let

By the way, maybe Bell's “local causality” should be called “classical local causality”. And my

Bryan and I only ever managed to recruit two adjudicators, not three. The two have agreed that Bryan

Anyone interested?

But the physicist will say “we hypothesize/conjecture/propose…”. The LLM does not say it is guessing.

Post it to Jarek Duda's "Models of particle" models-of...@googlegroups.com I see

Please show us your proof. Or is it merely a hypothesis? If Bell's theorem (as mathematics, a

PS: Now that it cleared that Bryan seeks an ontological change any discussion Bell or not Bell,

Dear Bryan I have long ago revised my analysis of Fred's paper. I'm preparing a paper

I reply only in deference to Alexandre: I applaud you telling us to discipline ourselves. You do not

Typical Bell fanatic nonsense. Let's see; yep it is the year 2026 and Bell's goose was cooked

“If [a hidden-variable theory] is local it will not agree with quantum mechanics, and if it agrees

We're scheduling a dryer vent cleaning and if anyone else is interested, we can get a group

Bryan, your Q-Spin fails in satellite entanglement experiments. Look at Fig 3 in the attached article

Dear Anton Hicks' address and your closing comments are wonderful! I'm in full agreement with

Richard, I'm not able to keep up with all the messages, but I kindly ask everyone to communicate

Anyone interested?

Bryan, This is public enough. It is of no wider interest and the disproofs have been peer reviewed

Hi Bryan, Man... that's some thread you got there. Let me add my 5 subscription pennies. https://

Dear Bryan, We are clearly talking past one another, so I will try to close the loop in a precise and