Dear Alexei You misinterpret me. I think that good philosophers do not think obscurely. If their work

Maybe somebody can help me make out what this paper is actually saying. The author sent it to me

Dear Richard, I heard in the past about the "Two envelopes paradox", and really couldn'

A will is the ability to bring a choice to rest by reasons, not a primitive power to pick arbitrarily

Dear SMH, Thank you for a careful and fair reading with thoughtfully crafted comments. I will try and

Dear All, I think you might find this interesting - it applies some math work I was doing in a

On "Einstein-style completionist": yes, of a time-symmetric kind. PV-REC keeps what

Yes, I am serious. I couldn't believe my ears. The context was one about determining the amount

I read Sakurai and I read your document. I read both, very carefully. Sent from my iPad On 29 Sep

Sorry, I accidentally wrote nonsense. [My excuse: I haven't had my morning coffee yet.] Let me

Richard, we could use the attached AI critique as a framework: ------ Original Message ------ From

The Freedman and Clauser (1972) experiment (I recommend reading Freedman's Ph.D. thesis, https://

Dear friends My friend Engel Wichmann just got his paper published in “Next Research”. It costs

Thanks Richard, had funny response from my web browser, first experience with ai.studio a domain new

We would hope for objectivity to be established by an AI for the majority of perspectives, or at

Dear Richard, You've said more than once that you can't follow my vocabulary. That's a

Dear Ghenadie, dear all, I think I got it figured out at last. Ghenadie's basic spinning disk

Dear Justo, I hope all is well. While there is a contextual reality to what you are saying, I think

Dear Richard, the paper is interesting if what it claims corresponds to the content of the original

Dear Anton, All, I had only just made the connection between this many worlds interpretation and

Dear Bart Your second paper has abstract as follows: Does Bell's theorem apply if perceived

I find this paper interesting. This is where Bertlmann is wearing complementary coloured socks? I

That has been their name since the beginning I think, and God bless 'em. Sadly, the word God has

Bryan, you do have what you call a hidden variable \lambda You do not have what we grown-up

I think the Copenhagen interpretation can be made rigorous and consistent by following Belavkin's

However, Bryan's Figure 3 contains interference pattern on the screen. But the cos^2*sinh^2

Dear Richard, I think it is an excellent idea that you write a paper about my model. You will then

Dear Richard, I believe a bet such as this is enforcible in the courts. i would support you if you

https://youtu.be/5xNSZfvgZtc?is=n6QK5UlYU4qKzPDQ

I forgot to change the old term spooky for the newer term magic. Apparently quantum magic is what

I put the abstract of Richard's paper into Google AI and asked for a comment on the abstract.

It seems clear to you, Parker. In which case you need to try to make it clear to others. Maybe there

No, Richard - I highly doubt that - unless the philosophy department is really into designing