On Oct 1, 10:25 am, Ram Ramani <
ram...@google.com> wrote:
> SPDY (
http://dev.chromium.org/spdy) attempts to solve the problem of having
> multiple http connections is a more elegant way. So supporting sprites
> wasn't one of the goals for webp.
>
> Having said that there have been mentions of other use cases for holding
> multiple images (such as resolution). So your ask seems reasonable.
>
> Ram
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Ali <
rahb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Web pages usually consist of many images that will add a considerable
> > request overhead. Today sprites are used to overcome this problem, but
> > they are hard to manage and maintain, for example when you want to add
> > a new image to the sprite.
>
> > Therefore, It would be so great if this format can contain more than
> > one image, and at the client the intended image is specified somehow,
> > maybe through the anchor (#). A good interface to convert and add
> > images to the container is also needed.
>
> > This will be beneficial in many ways. Hidden images, or images from
> > other page is loaded first time, and will reduce wait time so much.
> > And will reduce requests drastically.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "WebP Discussion" group.