intellectual curiosity : why using matroska rather than ogg ?
antistress
I was wandering why you've decided to use matroska rather than ogg
since both were possible i think ?
(Just out of curiosity)
Alex Converse
> Thank you very much for WebM
>
> I was wandering why you've decided to use matroska rather than ogg
> since both were possible i think ?
>
Because then it would be webo?
Jesaja Everling
"Encryption in Matroska is designed in a very generic style that
allows people to implement whatever form of encryption is best for
them. It is easily possible to use the encryption framework in
Matroska as a type of DRM."
http://www.matroska.org/technical/specs/notes.html#Encryption
But maybe I'm just paranoid! ;)
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Alex Converse <alex.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:32 AM, antistress <thibaut...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thank you very much for WebM
>>
>> I was wandering why you've decided to use matroska rather than ogg
>> since both were possible i think ?
>>
>
Luca Barbato
I think that they picked mkv since it has a better community support
since there isn't as
much friction as with ogg.
Many might not agree with the analysis[1] that deem ogg a problematic
container but
as many other do.
My experience with ogg had been less than stellar so I tend to agree
with Mans.
lu
[1] http://hardwarebug.org/2010/03/03/ogg-objections/
On May 27, 4:49 pm, Jesaja Everling <jeverl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I hope the reason is not because it has better DRM support...
>
> "Encryption in Matroska is designed in a very generic style that
> allows people to implement whatever form of encryption is best for
> them. It is easily possible to use the encryption framework in
> Matroska as a type of DRM."http://www.matroska.org/technical/specs/notes.html#Encryption
>
> But maybe I'm just paranoid! ;)
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Alex Converse <alex.conve...@gmail.com> wrote: