> Dominik did it! have a look at his WebM video decoder in Javascript here:
>
> http://libwebpjs.appspot.com/vp8/webm-javascript-decoder/
Site is over quota. :(
At relation to bemasc's effort?
http://people.xiph.org/~bens/route9/route9.html
-r
--
Ralph Giles
Xiph.org Foundation for open multimedia
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WebM Discussion" group.
To post to this group, send email to webm-d...@webmproject.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to webm-discuss...@webmproject.org.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/webmproject.org/group/webm-discuss/?hl=en.
+cc DominikHi,On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Basil Mohamed Gohar <abu_hu...@hidayahonline.org> wrote:
On 02/07/2012 11:18 AM, Ralph Giles wrote:The original post mentioned no decoding artifacts, which, if true in all
> On 7 February 2012 05:07, Pascal Massimino <pascal.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dominik did it! have a look at his WebM video decoder in Javascript here:
>>
>> http://libwebpjs.appspot.com/vp8/webm-javascript-decoder/
> Site is over quota. :(
>
> At relation to bemasc's effort?
>
> http://people.xiph.org/~bens/route9/route9.html
>
> -r
>
cases, is a big plus over Ben's initial go at an Emscripten libvpx
(something he mentioned was mainly proof of concept).it's been re-written from scratch, not from Emscripten. It's a one-man project,different from Route9. Looks like it's a little bit too successful :)
> it's been re-written from scratch, not from Emscripten. It's a one-man
> project,
> different from Route9. Looks like it's a little bit too successful :)
A hand translation? Wow.
Since the trend seems to be software inefficiency and redundancy, I
won´t touch anything less than a VP8 decoder in a Bash script.
;-P
(sarcasm)
FC
I raise you: 'sed'
Real hackers do it in postscript.
using something Turing-complete is cheating :)
-Matt
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WebM Discussion" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to webm-discuss+unsubscribe@webmproject.org.
To post to this group, send email to webm-d...@webmproject.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/a/webmproject.org/group/webm-discuss/.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/a/webmproject.org/d/optout.
that decoder permits random access points in the stream?
2017-06-12 13:37 GMT+02:00 <kiranr...@gmail.com>:
The decoder produces corrupted pixels when the keyframe interval is high(i.e. when key frame occurs for every 500 or 1000 interframes). The famous big buck bunny webm video widely found on the internet has approximately a key frame for every 30 interframes. If you try to play the attached video(zzz.webm which containes a key frame followed by 334 interframes), you can see some pixels changing color but it does not happen in any other media players.
On Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 6:37:11 PM UTC+5:30, skal wrote:Hi everybody,Dominik did it! have a look at his WebM video decoder in Javascript here:Works fairly well: i couldn't spot artifacts for the few files i tried. Well done!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WebM Discussion" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to webm-discuss...@webmproject.org.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to webm-discuss+unsubscribe@webmproject.org.