libvpx 1.12.0 does not compile on macOS Ventura (macOS 13)

221 views
Skip to first unread message

FX Coudert

unread,
Oct 24, 2022, 3:05:34 PM10/24/22
to Codec Developers
The darwin22 version is not detected by the configure scripts. Could a more robust mechanism be used to make the codebase more future-proof? It was already an issue last year when macOS 12 was released. https://github.com/webmproject/libvpx/commit/c59de7bc914d40305c1a7b066b9965d809d81533

Thanks,
FX

James Zern

unread,
Oct 24, 2022, 6:55:15 PM10/24/22
to codec...@webmproject.org
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:05 PM FX Coudert <fxco...@gmail.com> wrote:
The darwin22 version is not detected by the configure scripts. Could a more robust mechanism be used to make the codebase more future-proof? It was already an issue last year when macOS 12 was released. https://github.com/webmproject/libvpx/commit/c59de7bc914d40305c1a7b066b9965d809d81533

Thanks for the report. As the linked commit mentions, there's not really any difference between the versions as far as configure or the code are concerned. Having a simple darwin target should be enough. In the meantime, using the darwin21 target should work.
 

Thanks,
FX

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Codec Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to codec-devel...@webmproject.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/webmproject.org/d/msgid/codec-devel/21433ae3-0334-44ad-a8f7-78d1be16361bn%40webmproject.org.

James Zern

unread,
Oct 24, 2022, 7:03:33 PM10/24/22
to codec...@webmproject.org
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 3:55 PM James Zern <jz...@google.com> wrote:


On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:05 PM FX Coudert <fxco...@gmail.com> wrote:
The darwin22 version is not detected by the configure scripts. Could a more robust mechanism be used to make the codebase more future-proof? It was already an issue last year when macOS 12 was released. https://github.com/webmproject/libvpx/commit/c59de7bc914d40305c1a7b066b9965d809d81533

Thanks for the report. As the linked commit mentions, there's not really any difference between the versions as far as configure or the code are concerned. Having a simple darwin target should be enough. In the meantime, using the darwin21 target should work.

I filed https://crbug.com/webm/1783 for this.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages