Issue 349 in webp: Problematic frame: WEBP latest version

[zack… via monorail]

Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium

New issue 349 by zack...@gmail.com: Problematic frame: WEBP latest version
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/webp/issues/detail?id=349

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Send large amount of Webp call, then crashed.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Crashed.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Latest.

Please provide any additional information below.

==

# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# [thread 139758385334016 also had an error]SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00007f1c17d8832e, pid=22576, tid=0x00007f1c18de9700
#
# JRE version: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (8.0_131-b11) (build 1.8.0_131-b11)
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (25.131-b11 mixed mode linux-amd64 compressed oops)
# Problematic frame:
# C [libwebp-imageio.so+0x7632e] VP8FilterStrengthFromDelta+0x1e
#
# Failed to write core dump. Core dumps have been disabled. To enable core dumping, try "ulimit -c unlimited" before starting Java again


--
You received this message because:
1. The project was configured to send all issue notifications to this address

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings

[vincent.… via monorail]

Comment #1 on issue 349 by vincent....@gmail.com: Problematic frame: WEBP latest version
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/webp/issues/detail?id=349#c1

By latest you mean 0.6.0 or git master ?
Which OS are you on ?
Does it happen when you call it o nthe same image over and over or do you have to change images ?
Also, is there any way you can isolate your code from java too to make sure it does not come from the wrapper? Thx.

[zack… via monorail]

Comment #2 on issue 349 by zack...@gmail.com: Problematic frame: WEBP latest version
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/webp/issues/detail?id=349#c2

By latest you mean 0.6.0 or git master ?

git clone from master

Which OS are you on ?

Amazon Linux AMI release 2017.03

Does it happen when you call it o nthe same image over and over or do you
have to change images ?

Not the same image, it happens when the cpu overload is pretty high, like
+90%

Also, is there any way you can isolate your code from java too to make sure
it does not come from the wrapper

Sounds no. Using https://bitbucket.org/luciad/webp-imageio, webp is
checkout from mater, compiled with the following instruction:

Compiling
Compiling the native library for Java SE

- Install CMake 2.8 or newer. CMake can be downloaded from www.cmake.org or
installed using your systems package manager.
- Create a directory called build in the root of the project
- Open a terminal and navigate to the newly created 'build' directory
- Run cmake .. in the 'build' directory to generate the build scripts
for your system.
- cmake --build . to compile the library
- The compiled library can be found under the directory build/src/main/c
-

[jz… via monorail]

Updates:
Owner: vincent....@gmail.com

Comment #3 on issue 349 by jz...@google.com: Problematic frame: WEBP latest version
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/webp/issues/detail?id=349#c3

(No comment was entered for this change.)

[jz… via monorail]

Comment #4 on issue 349 by jz...@google.com: Problematic frame: WEBP latest version
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/webp/issues/detail?id=349#c4

Is there any test harness available to reproduce this locally? A sample image with the imageio decode would help.

[jz… via monorail]

Updates:
Labels: Needs-Feedback

Comment #5 on issue 349 by jz...@google.com: Problematic frame: WEBP latest version
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/webp/issues/detail?id=349#c5

Any update on this? Without a way to reproduce the issue we'll close this bug soon.

[jz… via monorail]

Updates:
Status: Invalid

Comment #6 on issue 349 by jz...@google.com: Problematic frame: WEBP latest version
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/webp/issues/detail?id=349#c6

Closing this one due to lack of activity. If there's still an issue and you can provide more detail based on the comments please feel free to reopen.