Hi Natalia & Aarti:
I believe ZWT, WT and WA are Noah-MP output variables and are specific to the TOPMODEL (RUNOFF_OPTION = 1 or 2) or MMF (RUNOFF_OPTION = 5) groundwater routing schemes. We do not currently support the MMF configuration when running WRF-Hydro since there is no mechanism to connect the MMF groundwater discharge to WRF-Hydro streams (and that scheme is really intended for much coarser representations than we generally run for WRF-Hydro). Instead, if a user thinks there is a deeper groundwater contribution that the simple WRF-Hydro baseflow formulations cannot handle, we encourage the user to use the built-in WRF-Hydro subsurface lateral flow routines and extend the soil depth/layers to approximate deeper groundwater flow. I have not worked much with the Noah-MP TOPMODEL schemes as we found they did not perform very well for runoff processes (ok for more humid regions). If you are running with RUNOFF_OPTION = 3 or 7 (what we generally recommend), these variables are not used and you should rely on the WRF-Hydro shallow water table outputs (these will be in RTOUT and HYDRO_RST, not the land model outputs or restarts).
When you are using the WRF-Hydro conceptual baseflow model, you are prescribing groundwater "basins" (there should have been created when you ran the GIS pre-processor). So the number of records in the GWOUT files corresponds to the number of groundwater basins you setup in the GIS pre-processor. The user is free to set these up how they want, depending on the main hydrologic drivers in your region and your application.
See the user guide for more:
Thanks!
Aubrey