Lin,
I brought this up at our WRF-Chem group meeting. WRF (meteorology
only) should give bit-for-bit reproduceability from a restart. For
example, comparing results from a simulation that is run from 0 to
3 days and a simulation that is run from 0 to 2 days then
restarted for day 2-3 should have the same meteorology results.
However, WRF-Chem does not give bit-for-bit results with a
restart file. You can test this yourself for a similar test case.
Nevertheless, for long simulations, WRF-Chem is often run with
restarts because there's just not enough computer time to run an
entire year at once. Hopefully there's some effort to explore this
further by WRF and/or WRF-Chem support team (which is small).
For running sensitivity simulations, it depends what you plan to
test sensitivity to. If it's meteorology parameterizations, then
the winds, temperatures, clouds will be different and all that
affects the predictions of constituent concentrations. You may
want to re-run the entire simulation for this case. If the
sensitivity is to emissions and there are NO aerosol effects* on
meteorology turned on, then you should theoretically be able to
start the sensitivity simulations from a restart time. However, it
would be good to check that the meteorology doesn't change.
*aerosol-radiation feedback = OFF, and aerosol-cloud effects are not included.
Again, it would be good to hear of other people's experiences.
Mary