Near-zero SOA in wrfout (WRF-Chem v4.5.2 with chem_opt = 202)

8 views
Skip to first unread message

1 Zephy

unread,
Feb 14, 2026, 3:04:51 AM (yesterday) Feb 14
to wrf-chem-run


Hi all,

I am running WRF-Chem v4.5.2 with chem_opt = 202 (MOZART–MOSAIC, 4-bin). I am investigating aerosol–climate effects from anthropogenic emissions and biomass-burning (fire) emissions, but I am seeing extremely small SOA-related aerosol concentrations in the output (order ~1e−16), and in some cases essentially zero.

What I see:

  • In wrfout, VBS aerosol-phase SOA species (e.g., asoa_a01–a04, bsoaa01–a04, and glysoa*_a01–a04) are ~1e−16 or ~0, with spatial structure but unrealistic magnitude.
  • Condensable vapor variables (e.g., cvasoa*, cvbsoa*) are also ~0.
  • Gas-phase VOC tracers such as BIGENE/BIGALK/ISOP are not zero in wrfout.
  • My emission/species mapping appears correct (I can confirm the required MOZART species are present in wrfchemi_00z_d01; e.g., E_BIGENE, E_BIGALK, E_ISOP, E_TOLUENE, E_BENZENE, etc.). Boundary/IC mapping also appears consistent.

Questions:

  1. Are there known configuration pitfalls in v4.5.2 that can lead to SOA being effectively shut off (e.g., chemistry options, aerosol options, emission switches, or compilation/config flags)?
  2. which key intermediate variables or budget terms should I check?
  3. if SOA is near-zero in this setup, how much could that bias aerosol–radiation/indirect effects when estimating climate impacts of anthropogenic + fire emissions? In other words, is it acceptable to proceed if my focus is climate response, or should I treat this as a critical issue requiring correction?

Environment:

  • WRF-Chem: v4.5.2
  • chem_opt: 202 (MOZART–MOSAIC 4-bin)
  • Emissions: anthropogenic + biomass burning (wrfchemi / wrffirechemi); MOZART gas-phase species present in wrfchemi
  • Output: BIGENE/BIGALK/ISOP non-zero; SOA aerosol-phase species ~1e−16; cvasoa/cvbsoa ~0

Any suggestions on the most likely causes and the best debugging steps would be greatly appreciated. If needed, I can share specific namelist options and a list of SOA-related variables present in my wrfout.

Thanks!

 

Mary Barth

unread,
Feb 14, 2026, 3:26:20 PM (12 hours ago) Feb 14
to 1 Zephy, wrf-chem-run
Hi there,

I wonder if aerchem_onoff = 0 in your namelist. It should be = 1.

Mary 
^--^--^--^--^--^--^--^--^--^--^--^--^--^--^-^--^--^--^-^--^
Mary Barth 
Senior Scientist   
phone: 303-497-8186    email: bar...@ucar.edu

NSF - National Center for Atmospheric Research
P.O. Box 3000
Boulder, CO 80307

^--^--^--^--^--^--^--^--^--^--^--^--^--^--^-^--^--^--^-^--^


1 Zephy

unread,
Feb 14, 2026, 10:53:37 PM (4 hours ago) Feb 14
to wrf-chem-run, Mary Barth, wrf-chem-run, 1 Zephy

Hi Mary,

Thanks for the suggestion. In my namelist, aerchem_onoff is already set to 1 (see &chem below), and other chemistry switches are on as well (gaschem_onoff=1, wetscav_onoff=1, etc.). However, SOA-related aerosol variables (asoa/bsoa/glysoa*** in MOSAIC bins) remain ~1e−16 (or ~0) and cvasoa/cvbsoa** are also ~0, while other species look normal with reasonable output (BC, OC, BIGENE, BIGALK, ISOPR).

Do you have other recommended switches/diagnostics to check to confirm SOA/VBS production is active (or common pitfalls in v4.5.2 for chem_opt=202)?

namelist.input
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages