Re: [stardog-users] Importing an ontology from Protégé-OWL 4.2

113 views
Skip to first unread message

Mike Grove

unread,
Apr 2, 2013, 10:59:52 AM4/2/13
to stardog



On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Cristofer Weber <cris....@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi there! 

I'm evaluating Stardog as a RDF database with OWL entailment capacity for SPARQL query processing. I'm currently using Stardog 1.1.5 on Windows 7 + Oracle Java 1.7, and have an ontology created with Protégé-OWL 4.2, saved in TURTLE format. Right now I have an issue with this construct:

#################################################################
#
#    General axioms
#
#################################################################
 
[ rdf:type owl:AllDisjointClasses ;
  owl:members ( <http://www.example.org/FND>
                <http://www.example.org/FPF>
                <http://www.example.org/FVK>
              )
] .

I'm creating a DB called myDB this way:
stardog-admin drop -n myDB
stardog-admin create -n myDB -t D -u admin -p admin --server snarl://localhost:5820/ c:\example.ttl


And this is the error I got in Stardog console:

[WARNING com.clarkparsia.stardog.index.StardogIndexLoader$e.run - Abr 2, 2013 11:21:42.139] Error parsing File: c:\example.ttl Object for statement missing [line 313]

This seems to indicate that it's a parse error.  Can you send the turtle file?

Cheers,

Mike
 
Creating index: 100% complete in 00:00:00
Creating index finished in 00:00:00
Loading complete.
Inserted 0 triples in 00:57:03 at 0,0K triples/sec

After commenting the OWL construct above it works fine. Is owl:AllDisjointClasses supported by Stardog?

Thanks!

Cristofer

--
-- --
You received this message because you are subscribed to the C&P "Stardog" group.
To post to this group, send email to sta...@clarkparsia.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
stardog+u...@clarkparsia.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/a/clarkparsia.com/group/stardog?hl=en
 
 

Cristofer Weber

unread,
Apr 10, 2013, 2:54:31 PM4/10/13
to sta...@clarkparsia.com
Hi Mike! It should be something related to Protégé since it worked after I changed my ontology format to RDF/XML.

Thanks for answering!
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages