On Jan 28, 2008 4:38 PM, Galt Barber <
ga...@soe.ucsc.edu> wrote:
> What you are doing here is stretching it to its absolute limits
> of sensitivity, plus you are using zillions of tiny targets.
Galt, thank you for your reply. I was also able to induce a match
given options you suggested. Unfortunately, it wouldn't work for
anything but exact matches ( I was hoping for 80% identity threshold
). I was wondering if decreasing tileSize would yield even further
sensitivity. Unfortunately, this value is apparently already at the
minimum allowed by the software. I even tried modifying the source
code to allow lower values; however I do not fully understand the
relationship of this parameter in the larger scope of the program, so
I may have not made all the necessary changes (I.e., I was unable to
produce 80% matches even with a tileSize of 3).
At this point, I am starting to look into other methods of producing
very large numbers of alignments between very small targets and even
smaller queries. There is much literature on the subject. Would you
have any suggestions of where to start?
Sincerely,
--
RH