Ecological monitoring and reporting?

[Rob Thomson]

OK, introductory post… with questions.

We’re looking at the possibility of using a number of “field assistants” gathering various data (ecological, HWC, etc) on a part time basis using phones/tablets. These will be downloaded initially to a local hub (office) which will periodically send the data on to a central database. Each local hub needs to be able to easily generate its own reports - graphs, maps, etc. to feed back to those involved, and will retain all their own data permanently. There probably won’t be any anti-poaching components to this, the contributors will not be employees, and it will not be operated in the fixed confines of a park/reserve. 

I could probably manage the local hubs purely with Cybertracker, but I’ve always found the reporting system a bit limited, and I’m wondering if SMART might be a reasonable alternative.  

Many thanks,

Rob

[Bergl, Richard]

Hi Rob,

SMART and SMART Connect would be ideal for what you describe and offer significant advantages over stand-alone cybertracker.  Happy to discuss in more detail what this would look like on a call if that is helpful.

Rich

---

From: Rob Thomson <robthomso...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 9:54:56 AM
To: SMART Community Forum <comm...@smartconservationsoftware.org>
Subject: [External] Ecological monitoring and reporting?

 

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SMART Community Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to community+...@smartconservationsoftware.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/smartconservationsoftware.org/d/msgid/community/5b4c78e5-f00e-40a4-bb10-c3e369c8b9bcn%40smartconservationsoftware.org.