--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RISC-V Soft CPU Discussion" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to softcpu-discu...@riscv.org.
To post to this group, send email to softcpu...@riscv.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/a/riscv.org/group/softcpu-discuss/.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/riscv.org/d/msgid/softcpu-discuss/12aaf293-d407-4f86-b2b2-1e35b251480e%40riscv.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/a/riscv.org/d/optout.
Thanks Antti,that's useful albeit at this point I'm not sure...
IIUC, it seems to be the conclusion that all the required workloads can run frominternal memory?
That changes everything as you no longer have to interfacewith their external DRAM controller, at which point you don't really need to careabout the Libero system builder.
Also, not having to implement caches simplifiesthe core significantly.
I still would have preferred that would have provided the exact binaries to runto level the playing field. Allowing custom libc implementations makes this thewild west and further diminishes the practical value of the cores.Tommy
Well, I guess I'm just dumb. I have a raw binary file ucode.bin that I want to program to the eNVM, and I can't figure out how to do it.