All,
I am sorry the email below was sent without subject by mistake.
From: Paulo Coimbra [mailto:paulo....@owasp.org]
Sent: quarta-feira, 2 de Fevereiro de 2011 01:23
To: 'Global Projects Committee'
Cc: 'sandra...@owasp.org'; 'Jason Li'; 'Brad Causey'; 'summit-2011-wo...@owasp.org'; 'OWASP Foundation Board List'
Subject:
Jason, Brad, GPC,
It seems to me that ‘our’ working session is one of the most stalled of all and I have certainly responsibility on it.
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011_Working_Sessions/Session014
Nevertheless, I still think we can plan it enough to have a productive meeting. If you agree, I will try to prepare a table to describe the state of OWASP Projects by using the main categories of the GPC template currently utilized and departing from the data assembled here http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Projects_Dashboard.
As deliverable, I also suggest we think about creating the second leg of our assessment criteria (projects), as was planned when V2 was launched, since currently it only captures Releases metrics.
On top of the above I suggest we also address questions of project funding, marketing & design.
In addition, I propose we reflect about the desirable level of resources the current set of projects needs to be technically and/or linguistically reviewed, assessed, packed, distributed and managed so that the global output can be improved.
I also propose we delete the links below and simultaneously create an independent WS to discuss Commercial Services.
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Working_Sessions_Projects_Assessment_Criteria_and_Orphaned_Projects
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Working_Sessions_Projects_Funding_Marketing_and_Commerical_Services
May I have please your thoughts?
Thanks,
- Paulo
Paulo Coimbra,