Leaders,
Please note that, as per Dinis' suggestion, we will now use the tab "Discussion" on each WS page to collect and store raw data, thoughts, exchange of ideas and discussions had between interested parties and participants regarding the Working Session. So, please, if you have any ideas on a particular Working Session that you would like to share, feel free to add them to the respective Discussion page.
See here for an example:
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011_Working_Sessions/Session023
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Talk:Summit_2011_Working_Sessions/Session023
This decision helped us to solve the pending problem of separating structured content from raw data and has, therefore, allowed us to keep and use the current templates throughout the consolidation process although with a few minor adjustments that will be made.
That is to say that we will be working on the consolidation as you are updating the WS with content.
Please bare with us and expect us to contact you directly more frequently asking for information!
Best regards,
Sandra
OWASP Summit2011 Team
_______________________________________________
Owasp-summit-2011 mailing list
Owasp-su...@lists.owasp.org
https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-summit-2011
Hi Matteo,
The ' OWASP Secure Coding Practices Project' working session has been created and is ready for your input. Please add the information here:
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011_Working_Sessions/Session201.
If you could let me know once everything is done, that would be great!
For your reference, the below are the elements that are being required:
- Clear Description of the WS;
- Clear and detailed objectives;
- Working session additional details (note that you can use both the link on the ws wiki page and the 'Discussion' page for this purpose if you like);
- Concise and feasible Outcomes/Deliverables (these should be concrete proposals for action to be presented for approval to the Board in the Summit; for some examples, please take a look at the ones that have been recently added as per Jeff's request).
From: Sandra Paiva [mailto:sandra...@owasp.org]
Sent: sexta-feira, 28 de Janeiro de 2011 13:27
To: matteo...@owasp.org
Cc: 'Paulo Coimbra'; 'Sarah Baso'; 'dinis cruz'
Subject: RE: Testing Guide & Common vuln list Working Sessions.
Hi Matteo,
Excellent - thanks for this!
With regard to the 'OWASP Common Vulnerability List' WS, Paulo is working on it as we speak.
The final schedule for the WS will be prepared by Dinis and Sarah Baso very close to the beggining of the Summit - I am copying them above so that they can add the information below to their notes.
De: Matteo Meucci [mailto:matteo...@owasp.org]
Enviada: sexta-feira, 28 de Janeiro de 2011 13:16
Para: Sandra Paiva
Assunto: Testing Guide & Common vuln list Working Sessions.
Hi Sandra,
I've updated, WS on Testing Guide:
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011_Working_Sessions/Session052
Is that correct?
Then, I do not see the schedule of the Working Sessions: I think it's really important to have the WS on OWASP Common Vulnerabilty list at least one day before this session, because in the first we have to decide some items that are necessary for session52.
Thanks,
Mat
_______________________________________________
OWASP-Leaders mailing list
OWASP-...@lists.owasp.org
https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-leaders
All,
My apologies – I wanted to say “the ' OWASP Secure Coding Practices Project' working session has been created and is ready for your input”.
Best regards,
De: Matteo Meucci [mailto:matteo...@owasp.org]
Enviada: sexta-feira, 28 de Janeiro de 2011 13:16
Para: Sandra Paiva
Assunto: Testing Guide & Common vuln list Working Sessions.
Hi Sandra,
I've updated, WS on Testing Guide:
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011_Working_Sessions/Session052
Is that correct?
Then, I do not see the schedule of the Working Sessions: I think it's really important to have the WS on OWASP Common Vulnerabilty list at least one day before this session, because in the first we have to decide some items that are necessary for session52.
Thanks,
Mat
Il 20/01/2011 20:23, Sandra Paiva ha scritto:
_______________________________________________
Apologies again! L I suppose I am in severe need of a big cup of coffee - as you all have already understood in fact I wanted to say the “OWASP Common vulnerability list session has been created and is ready for your input”.
Best regards,
De: Matteo Meucci [mailto:matteo...@owasp.org]
Enviada: sexta-feira, 28 de Janeiro de 2011 13:16
Para: Sandra Paiva
Assunto: Testing Guide & Common vuln list Working Sessions.
Hi Sandra,
I've updated, WS on Testing Guide:
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011_Working_Sessions/Session052
Is that correct?
Then, I do not see the schedule of the Working Sessions: I think it's really important to have the WS on OWASP Common Vulnerabilty list at least one day before this session, because in the first we have to decide some items that are necessary for session52.
Thanks,
Mat
Il 20/01/2011 20:23, Sandra Paiva ha scritto:
_______________________________________________