Andrew van der Stock
unread,May 13, 2025, 12:48:10 AMMay 13Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Global-board, ashwini siddhi, Global-board, Andrew van der Stock
We need a more comprehensive project policy to deal with generative AI creations. In particular, we need to ensure that, in consultation with our project leader community, we look at:
- CRA-related changes about secure software development and a carve out for training projects, like Juice Shop or others that are deliberately insecure
- CRA-related ensures that OWASP can pass repos to new project leadership or push changes to the repo in case of security issues and non-responsive leadership
- a Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO) or Contributor License Agreement (CLA) that ensures that the contributor has the authority to contribute code to us and/or under what terms
- Contributors must carefully review code or documentation generated by AI for plagiarism, hallucinations, and falsehoods before being committed or released.
- OWASP does not allow AI agents or assistants that might create a copyright claim, especially if there's no attribution to the original content that the AI agent/assistant was trained on
This doesn't affect the member, events, or chapter community, so the project policy is the right place to do this.
thanks,
Andrew
On Friday, May 9, 2025 at 5:09:59 AM UTC+10 ashwini siddhi wrote:
Do we also need a 'Responsible use of AI' policy? I do not see anything related and hence the ask.
Regards
Ashwini
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 10:20 AM 'Andrew van der Stock' via Global-board <
global...@owasp.org> wrote:
Hi Board,
I've created and published two policies for a potential May approval:
Working Groups - incorporates an informative note in the Committees policy, as well as a small bylaws change
Travel policy - incorporates much of the review by our community already
Additionally, it's more than time we passed the Privacy Policy. I will ask folks to write comments on that policy, and hopefully it can also come to be voted on in May.
Please review and comment. I'll convene the Policy Review Committee for the last week of May to incorporate all feedback.
Thanks,
Andrew
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Global-board" group.