Sherif Mansour
unread,Nov 10, 2021, 4:53:07 AM11/10/21Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Sign in to report message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Martin Knobloch, Andrew van der Stock, Dawn Aitken, Global-board, Grant Ongers (OWASP), Owen Pendlebury, Tom Pappas
Hi Martin, the main thing is not the limit - the main thing is that OWASP is paying for things with other people’s credit cards.
Mike was paying for OWASP expenses with a credit card issued to him (he was the personal guarantee of the card).
Now when Andrew joined and continued this - his personal credit score went down due to a late payment. So it impacted him personally (negatively).
Secondly it’s a conflict of interest - the card holder would benefit from the increase in points (and the effects of the credit rating) none of the benefits would be passed on to OWASP.
Finally the limits - in general should not be paying for things with a credit card (though some are needed) to demand good behaviour we also need to cap bad behaviour. Hence the limit. And it should be a corporate credit card and Andrew or Mike’s personal card.
That is the reason for the motion.
I hope this helps.
-Sherif
--