Hi Board,
Thank you for your discussions on this matter to date. At the moment, the OWASP Foundation is down two staff members, and this is placing a huge strain on the staff and creating quite the backlog of tickets. Many staff are doing tasks that aren't in their job duties and working long hours, including weekends. To address this situation, I proposed to the Board last month that the Foundation contracts with Harold Blankenship during this time, as he is an ex staff member and is familiar with many of the tasks needing to be done.
After obtaining legal advice, the primary risks to the Foundation are to address the risks of perceived or actual conflict of interest and to ensure that the remuneration is at fair market rates. To that end, I've created a motion which addresses these recommendations from our lawyers, and allows us to spread the workload whilst we seek candidates for these roles.
The motion is as follows:
"Resolved, the Executive Director is permitted to contract with Harold Blankenship at market rates as determined by similar roles advertised on Upwork.
To address perceived or actual conflicts of interest, based upon legal advice, the following guardrails will be in place:
- Harold's Treasurer duties will remain insofar as to provide financial oversight for the Board and assist, reviewing the monthly financial summaries from the Charity CFO, and finally, any preparation needed for the external audit, but not expense co-approvals
-The Chair will co-approve amounts exceeding the Executive Director's signing limit.
- Harold will not approve his own expenses, including Board travel and contracting fees.
- Harold's duties will primarily be operational in nature, including processing chapter and membership tickets, assisting with operational matters, and ensuring the day-to-day business of the Foundation is conducted in a timely fashion.
- If Harold is still being contracted at the time the election processes kick off, as he is a sitting Board member, he will not be handling any part of the election operational process.
If any actual or perceived conflicts of interest arise, then the Board will follow the Conflict of Interest policy to address any potential breaches."
Can I please have a sponsor and a second? As it's an e-vote, I will send a Google Form privately to each Board member once we have a motion to discuss and vote upon. I will accept friendly amendments to the motion if you feel that some aspect of the conflict of interest or fair market rates is not being met.
thanks,
Andrew