N4/Sx support

[angelo coluni]

Hi,

 I am new to OMEC project, however before I begin to investigate its capabilities and features, I would like to know if ngic-rtc project supports N4/Sx interface ?

Any feedback would be appreciated

thank-you

[Maciocco, Christian]

Hi,

The Sprint repos 1.5 and 1.6 do support Sxa/Sxb interfaces over PFCP.

Thanks

Christian

On May 20, 2020, at 9:32 AM, angelo coluni <lmca...@gmail.com> wrote:



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OMEC Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to omec-dev+u...@opennetworking.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/opennetworking.org/d/msgid/omec-dev/229a8c97-ccd5-4b9f-93b5-d8ecd5217c4a%40opennetworking.org.

[amit.w...@gslab.com]

Yes , adding on it you can find the code here which support SX:

https://github.com/omec-project/ngic-rtc/tree/e-utran-features

refer documentation for detail under 'doc' directory.

On Wednesday, May 20, 2020 at 10:28:13 PM UTC+5:30, Maciocco, Christian wrote:

Hi,

The Sprint repos 1.5 and 1.6 do support Sxa/Sxb interfaces over PFCP.

Thanks

Christian

On May 20, 2020, at 9:32 AM, angelo coluni <lmca...@gmail.com> wrote:



Hi,

 I am new to OMEC project, however before I begin to investigate its capabilities and features, I would like to know if ngic-rtc project supports N4/Sx interface ?

Any feedback would be appreciated

thank-you

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OMEC Developers" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to omec...@opennetworking.org.

[angelo coluni]

Hi thanks for your support,

I was able to configure and install spw-c and pgw-c, however  would like to know if any available scripts or config options are available in ngic to run a simulated test (ex.. session establish / create/ modify /delete) to validate traffic  with a SPGW-U, no dataplane traffic just create sessions ?  

thank-you

Confidentiality Notice and Disclaimer: This email (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential, privileged and/or copyrighted. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this email. Any unauthorized use of the contents of this email in any manner whatsoever, is strictly prohibited. If improper activity is suspected, all available information may be used by the sender for possible disciplinary action, prosecution, civil claim or any remedy or lawful purpose. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, lost, arrive late, or contain viruses. The sender is not liable whatsoever for damage resulting from the opening of this message and/or the use of the information contained in this message and/or attachments. Expressions in this email cannot be treated as opined by the sender company management – they are solely expressed by the sender unless authorized.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OMEC Developers" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to omec-dev+u...@opennetworking.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/opennetworking.org/d/msgid/omec-dev/7fd9721d-97e3-4cc3-b437-b3ab79b77713%40opennetworking.org.

[angelo coluni]

Thanks,

I have compiled and configured ( cp.cfg),  swg-c and pgw-c without DNS, started the run.sh, however I do not see  any pfcp association setup request going out to UPF ?

Am I missing something in the config

thanks

example:

CP Optimization level-3 for performance is set:

Setting up Control Plane NUMA memory

-l 0-1 --socket-mem 2048,0 --file-prefix cp --no-pci -- -z 3

CP: Control-Plane rstCnt: 46

EAL: Detected 5 lcore(s)

EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/.cp_unix

EAL: Probing VFIO support...

EAL: WARNING: cpu flags constant_tsc=yes nonstop_tsc=no -> using unreliable clock cycles !

CP: PFCP Config Parsing ../config/cp.cfg

CP: CP_TYPE     : SGW-C

CP: DEFAULT REQUEST_TIMEOUT: 300000

CP: DEFAULT REQUEST_TRIES: 3

CP: S11_IP      : 172.16.1.105

CP: S11_PORT    : 2123

CP: S5S8_IP     : 172.58.58.103

CP: S5S8_PORT   : 2123

CP: PFCP_IP     : 172.24.12.21

CP: PFCP_PORT   : 8805

CP: MME_S11_IP  : 172.16.1.102

CP: MME_S11_PORT: 2123

CP: UPF_PFCP_IP : 172.24.12.14

CP: UPF_PFCP_PORT: 8805

CP: TRANSMIT_TIMER: 2

CP: PERIODIC_TIMER: 10

CP: TRANSMIT_COUNT: 5

CP: REQUEST_TIMEOUT: 1800000

CP: REQUEST_TRIES: 3

CP: CP_LOGGER: 1

CP: [concurrent] = 25

CP: [percentage] = 80

CP: [interval_seconds] = 60

CP: [query_timeout_ms] = 1000

CP: [query_tries] = 1

CP: [frequency_seconds] = 3

CP: [filename] = appqueries.json

CP: [nameserver] = 192.168.40.60

CP: [frequency_seconds] = 3

CP: [filename] = opsqueries.json

CP: [nameserver] = 192.168.40.60

CP: [IP_POOL_IP] = 60.6.0.0

CP: [IP_POOL_MASK] = 255.0.0.0

Debug mode is set: CP Performance will be poor

Setting up Control Plane NUMA memory

-l 0-1 --socket-mem 2048,0 --file-prefix cp --no-pci -- -z 3

CP: Control-Plane rstCnt: 31

EAL: Detected 5 lcore(s)

EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/.cp_unix

EAL: Probing VFIO support...

EAL: WARNING: cpu flags constant_tsc=yes nonstop_tsc=no -> using unreliable clock cycles !

CP: PFCP Config Parsing ../config/cp.cfg

CP: CP_TYPE     : PGW-C

CP: DEFAULT REQUEST_TIMEOUT: 300000

CP: DEFAULT REQUEST_TRIES: 3

CP: S11_IP      : 172.16.1.106

CP: S11_PORT    : 2123

CP: S5S8_IP     : 172.58.58.104

CP: S5S8_PORT   : 2123

CP: PFCP_IP     : 172.24.12.22

CP: PFCP_PORT   : 8805

CP: MME_S11_IP  : 172.16.1.102

CP: MME_S11_PORT: 2123

CP: UPF_PFCP_IP : 172.24.12.14

CP: UPF_PFCP_PORT: 8805

CP: TRANSMIT_TIMER: 2

CP: PERIODIC_TIMER: 10

CP: TRANSMIT_COUNT: 5

CP: REQUEST_TIMEOUT: 1800000

CP: REQUEST_TRIES: 3

CP: CP_LOGGER: 1

CP: [concurrent] = 25

CP: [percentage] = 80

CP: [interval_seconds] = 60

CP: [query_timeout_ms] = 1000

CP: [query_tries] = 1

CP: [frequency_seconds] = 3

CP: [filename] = appqueries.json

CP: [nameserver] = 192.168.40.60

CP: [frequency_seconds] = 3

CP: [filename] = opsqueries.json

CP: [nameserver] = 192.168.40.60

CP: [IP_POOL_IP] = 60.60.0.0

CP: [IP_POOL_MASK] = 255.0.0.0

[Ajay Thakur]

In the current codebase, CSReq will trigger PFCP association setup.

Ajay

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OMEC Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to omec-dev+u...@opennetworking.org.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/opennetworking.org/d/msgid/omec-dev/d9a9d284-d902-4515-998b-abd6e8546f8ao%40opennetworking.org.